“marginally significant”

The best-fitting model predicting the Bayley-III Cognitive Index included theta modulation index at 6 months , absolute theta power at 6 months, and age at outcome as predictors (F(3, 55) = 2.92), and was marginally significant (p = 0.042), explaining 13.7 % of the variance in the dependent variable (R 2 = 0.137, adjusted R 2 = 0.090).

We found marginally significant associations of the BPRS-24 item 4 with the traits of suspiciousness (Spearman = 0.178, p -value = 0.042), perseverance (Spearman = 0.179, p -value = 0.040), rigid perfectionism (Spearman = 0.179, p -value = 0.040), reduced affectivity (Spearman = 0.180, p -value = 0.038), eccentricity (Spearman = 0.171, p -value = 0.050), grandiosity (Spearman = 0.171, p -value = 0.050), impulsivity (Spearman = 0.181, p -value = 0.038), and the disinhibition domain (Spearman = 0.200, p -value = 0.020) using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

An analysis by cancer site found at most a marginally significant association between X mosaicism and lung cancer risk (OR=1.89, 95% CI=1.02–3.50, P value=0.042; 26 lung cancer cases with mosaicism).

In addition, association of nuclear cataracts with the TT genotype of rs7543472 is marginally significant at p<0.042 and suggestive with the TT genotype of rs3754334 at p<0.06.

After adjusting for major social movements, ITS analysis showed a small but marginally significant decline in the population incidence in the pre-pandemic period (risk ratio, RR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.99–1.00, p = 0.042).

Although PWI had a marginally significant effect on cell density in the NAc (Two-way ANOVA: F(1, 36) = 4.448, p = 0.042 for the PWI effect), post-hoc analysis revealed no significant differences between GH and PWI groups in females ( p = 0.059) or males ( p = 0.726) (Fig. 1 I and K).

In terms of making the correct decision when comparing the parental stress scores for subgroups of parents, the adjustments for DIF in both cases meant that the strongly significant difference between the mean scores of parents from each of the two samples was reduced to being marginally significant ( p = .042), while the strongly significant difference between the mean scores of parents with secondary or less education and parents with tertiary education disappeared.

In both instances, the deeper probes detected higher levels of the gas, and there was an overall marginally significant positive relationship of N 2 O with height ( F = 4.59 on 1 and 25 df; p = 0.042; coefficient 0.070, SE 0.040).

The slope of the psychometric function (Model 1b, see Methods), did show a main effect of test moment (F 1,80 = 30.09, p < 0.0001), and stimulus type (F 2,80 = 44.79, p < 0.0001), and a marginally significant interaction effect (F 2,80 = 3.31, p = 0.042).

For the Barthel Index, both at discharge and follow-up, marginally significant differences were observed (U = 679.5, Z = −2.029, p = 0.042 and U = 692.5, Z = −2.001, p = 0.045, respectively).

Regarding lactate, a marginally significant negative association could be seen ( p = 0.042, 95% CI: −1.618–−0.293).

Our Mantel tests showed a marginally significant result ( r = 0.074; p = 0.042), indicating Hyacinth macaws follow an IBD model (Figure S5 ). 4.

However, there was a marginally significant interaction between leadership strength and role (F(1,92) = 4.256, p = 0.042, partial η 2 = 0.044) as the leaders of pairs with strong leadership showed higher global efficiency (Supplementary Note 6 ), especially on the midfrontal and right centrotemporal areas.

Specifically, maternal depression ( p = .001) and SSRIs ( p = .001) were significantly associated with cognitive scores (note, cocaine was marginally significant at p = .042).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant association between believing that the vaccines are effective against early circulating strains and increased vaccine acceptance ( p = 0.042, OR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.04–12.1).

However, a marginally significant effect on μ was found for no-gap stimuli when these responses were subdivided according to trial correct–incorrect outcome, F (1, 38) = 4.41; p = .042 ( Figure 4C ).

There was a marginally significant trend toward internal nest-cup depths being shallower as temperatures increased with decreasing latitude ( F 3,57 = 4.32, P = 0.042, Fig. 3 E), with post-hoc tests revealing no significant differences between any of the individual study sites (all P values >0.05).

1 This study achieved the first proof of concept of epigenetic cancer risk diagnosis in any type of cancer but, due to the short follow-up period, a relatively small number of events were observed, resulting in a marginally significant difference (p=0.042).

Post-hoc tests supported this inference by showing a strong effect of starting-foot for the Australians [F(1,35) = 43.310, p < .001, η p 2 = .553] and a marginally significant effect for the Swiss [F(1,33) = 4.426, p = .042, η p 2 = .118].

The correlation between sensitivity and conservation was marginally significant (Spearman ρ ; p = 0.042).

Similarly, the sensitivity analysis of the factors affecting resistance rates also confirmed that there was no significant temporal changes for all Acinetobacter isolates and when considering ACB isolates only (the temporal trend was marginally significant for ACB with P = 0.042; Additional file 1 : Table S1), and that the North East region had higher rates on average than other regions (resistance rates in the sensitivity analyses ranging from 1.0 to 11.1 and 0 to 24.0% for ACB isolates).

The difference was marginally significant ( x 2 test, P = 0.042).

However, only two of these associations were marginally significant: in high grade (pG3) tumors (OR, 0.54; 95% c.i., 0.29–1.00; p = 0.042), and in PR negative tumors (OR, 0.58; 95% c.i., 0.33–1.01; p < 0.05; Figure 2 ). 2.5.

Notably, the exclusion of Gami (2013) [ 14 ] resulted in a marginally significant pooled OR ( p = 0.042), while all other exclusions yielded non-significant results (p-values ranging from 0.049 to 0.249).

For Russian, the human baseline was marginally significant ( B = −0.582, p = 0.042, OR = 0.56), indicating slightly lower odds of correct responses.