“marginally significant”

The results confirmed a marginally significant difference between Asperger’s disorder and the controls ( p < 0.1) and a significant difference between PDD-NOS and the controls ( p < 0.05), but none between Asperger’s disorder and PDD-NOS ( p > 0.1).

The binomial logistic regression models contained all variables with marginally significant differences (p values < 0.1) 30 in the univariate analysis.

CO only showed marginally significant associations with PAI-1 at 3-d to 6-d moving averages ( p <0.10).

For each variable, if its correlation coefficient, either positive or negative, is marginally significant with p -value < 0.1, variable is selected to be included in the remainder of the process.

There was also a marginally significant effect for Condition ( F (3,87) = 2.36, P < 0.10).

We found that at all stages the protein interaction pairs' absolute Pearson correlation coefficients were larger than the total control at a significant level ( p < 0.001 for N, C, and D) or marginally significant level ( p < 0.1, for E and A).

The relevant coefficient was also marginally significant for migration between SA4s (OR = 0.91; p < 0.1).

After logistic regression, 3 “true or false”-response questions related to history of depression in self and family history appeared marginally significant (logistic regression, FDR-corrected p < 0.1), with a self-reported “true” response to a “family history of depression” showing a marginal association with constipation (logistic regression, FDR-corrected <0.1), a self-reported “true” response to a “sibling history of depression” showing a significant association with diarrhea (logistic regression, FDR-corrected <0.05), and a self-reported “true” response to “recent ailments in self-history of depression” showing a marginal association with low-normal BMF (logistic regression, FDR-corrected <0.1).

There was a marginally significant effect between weeks of telecommuting on two domains—distraction, F (3, 2015) = 2.11, p = 0.10, and work-life effectiveness, F (3, 2015) = 2.11, p = 0.10.

Measures that were at least marginally significant (p=0.10) were retained in the multivariate analyses.

Results for the LW, however, show marginally significant negative effects for both the White and Hispanic subgroups ( p < 0.1).

Model selection was based on F-tests, and we used backward deletion conserving marginally significant ( P < 0.1) variables.

Regression analyses, which incorporated variables in the bivariate comparisons that were at least marginally significant at p < 0.10, were used to examine adjusted least-square means for HRQoL by level of presenteeism.

= 1.239), and the difference is statistically marginally significant ( t (158) = 1.749, p < 0.10).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant negative effect of soil from heterospecifics vs. conspecifics on the survival of Prunus serotina seedlings (GLMM, F 1,53 = 2.77, P = 0.10; Fig. 1 ), and other species were unaffected (H1)( P ≥0.40).

Two variables were found to be significantly associated with variation in spore counts ( p < 0.05), and one had a marginally significant effect ( p < 0.1).

However, median serum IFN-γ was 13.9 (7) pg/mL in the depressed group versus 10.5 (4.3) pg/mL for those below the depression score threshold, a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.10).

Across all analyses, we used the conventional alpha level of p ≤ 0.05 as the criterion for significance, but also report marginally significant findings (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10), specifying effect sizes in all cases.

A fourth variable, maternal depression, yielded a marginally significant (p < .10) disparity indicating higher levels for Black mothers than Non-Hispanic White mothers.

Leader narcissism showed a marginally significant negative relation with entrepreneurial team performance (β = −0.241, p < 0.10).

After completing a t-test for the Ranch Hand data at each of the 37 overlapping loci, we found five to have a significant difference in methylation ( p < 0.05) between control and high exposure groups, and two additional loci to be marginally significant before correction for multiple comparisons ( p < 0.1; Table 3 ).

Otherwise, the prevalence between bla NDM carrier and antibiotic usage in recent three months (including penicillin, floxacin, polymyxin and metronidazole), drinking status, physical exercise and diabetes were reported marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Tests were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****) or marginally significant when 0.05 < p < 0.1.

The cells marked with “a” mean significant relationships ( p < 0.05) and cells marked with “b” mean marginally significant relationships (0.05 < p < 0.1).

As illustrated in Figure 4 , there was a marginally significant interaction effect between time and group on HR, F = 2.73, p = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.05, indicating that HR was significantly decreased within the control group, p = 0.021, while it did not change in the experimental group, p = 0.279.