“marginally significant”

However, it was marginally significant ( p < .1) for Korean American young adults in the comprehensive model, and for Filipino American young adults when considered in conjunction with the language spoken at home in the interaction model.

Among these metabolites, 1,3-DIMETHYLURIC ACID, 2-Amino-5-chlorobenzoxazole, 4-guanidinobutanoate, 6-Acetamido-3-oxohexanoate, 9-Methyluric acid, Hecogenin, Methyl linolenate, Pristimerin, 8-O-Tigloyldiderroside, Flucytosine, Spicatolide E, and (2-Aminoethyl) phosphonic acid remained marginally significant ( p < 0.1) following multiple-testing correction.

For instance, higher levels of structural–associational solidarity were associated with a slightly higher probability of expecting filial care at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1).

All hypotheses were tested two-sided, but we also report marginally significant effects ( p < .1) that would be significant if we tested one-sided.

In Model 1, hypotheses M 1 H1 and M 1 H2 were rejected, indicating that spectator satisfaction and trust have no significant direct effects on loyalty; M 1 H3, M 1 H4, M 1 H5, and M 1 H6 were supported, indicating that spectator satisfaction significantly predicts trust and team identification, team identification significantly predicts loyalty, and trust has a weak but meaningful direct effect on team identification (marginally significant at p < 0.10).

For current use, ORs increased with education level but estimates from the survey-weighted model were imprecise; most education categories were not statistically significant, and the association for college graduates was marginally significant (p<0.10).

Given the preliminary nature of the study and the small sample size, the results were considered significant at P <.05 and marginally significant at P <.10.

Second, the accuracy scores appeared to be slightly better for reference number 16 than for reference number 32, as indicated by the marginally significant Wilcoxon Tests in the math group, z = −1.33, p = .1 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .84, SD = .05; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .83, SD = .06), and in the control group, z = −1.76, p = .07 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .83, SD = .06; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .84, SD = .05).

There was a significant association between smoking and dyspepsia ( p <0.05), as well as a marginally significant association between inadequate sleep and dyspepsia (p<0.10).

Specifically, for the 117 terms consistently hypermethylated across different cancer types, we found that 115 terms were consistently enriched with hypermethylated genes for all four subtypes (hypergeometric test, P <0.05) and the other two terms were also marginally significant for all four subtypes (hypergeometric test, P <0.1).

This study observed that, at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1), older adults exhibited better glycemic control, potentially due to a lower degree of insulin resistance and higher participation/engagement in programs [ 2 ].

The difference between the auditory and the olfactory conditions was marginally significant ( p <.10).

We also tested by means of Welch two-sample t -tests whether male and female participants obtained significantly different scores on each scale: marginally significant differences due to participants sex emerged for ASI Hostile [men scored an average of 2.15 vs. an average of 1.65 for women, t (29.35) = 1.73, p < 0.1], whereas for the remaining scales no differences due to participants’ sex emerged [all t s < 1].

Since this was a pilot or proof-of-concept study, statistically significant treatment differences were declared if the probability of random occurrence among or between the treatment groups, p , was ≤ 0.05, and treatment differences were declared marginally significant if 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10.

The first model for which all AUs helped predict at least a marginally significant ( p < 0.10) variance in the dependent variable emotion/appraisal was selected as the final model.

We calculated the summary effect estimate using both fixed and random effect models, since the p-value for the test of homogeneity was marginally significant ( Table 3 ; p<0.10), which suggests some heterogeneity may be present and the variance between studies should be incorporated into the analyses to obtain confidence limits.

There was a marginally significant main effect of BIS affect, b = 0.17, SE = 0.10, β = 0.32, t (65) = 1.69, p < 0.10, all other p s > 0.22.

The finding was marginally significant ( p < 0.10) for the Work and Welfare group.

In the next step, a multidimensional predictive model was developed based on these 6 variables, which demonstrated either a significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) association with transfusion occurrence in the univariate analysis.

Small and marginally significant associations were found between PTQ and backward inhibition ( r = −0.18, p = 0.10) and switch cost ( r = 0.21, p = 0.07).

Individuals whose deployment location was not Afghanistan had a marginally significant shorter delay to care (0.05<p≤ 0.10).

BCVA before treatment and imaging findings showed marginally significant associations ( P <0.1).

Bivariate analysis focused on identifying covariates that showed at least a marginally significant (p-value ≤ 0.10) association with SEQ-12 score.

The two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of stage (F (1, 18) = 3.24, p < 0.1) and a significant marginally interaction between group and stage (F (1, 18) = 3.04, p < 0.1).

After adjusting for covariates such as age, ethnicity, and BMI, exposure to PFOA and PFOS significantly increased the risk of endometriosis, while PFHxS exposure showed a marginally significant association with endometriosis risk ( p < 0.10).