“marginally significant”

All hypotheses were tested two-sided, but we also report marginally significant effects ( p < .1) that would be significant if we tested one-sided.

in the Swabian Alp), while root increment showed initially an inconsistent pattern (as indicated by the marginally significant treatment × exploratory-interaction in Table 3 ; Fig. 2 left; F 2, 82 = 2.82, P < 0.1).

Therefore, variables with marginally significant effect ( P < 0.1) on univariate analysis, were accounted for in our Cox-regression multivariate analysis (MVA).

The DiD analysis results further supported this finding, showing that as r k 1 k 2 progressively deteriorated, the differential response in selection accuracy between CR and RR became marginally significant (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10, Figure 9 ).

The result in Model 2 shows a marginally significant negative interaction effect between CDELEV and EQINC ( β CDELEV × EQINC = − 0.059, p < 0.10).

In addition, it can be seen that the linear effect of temperature had a marginally significant negative value ( p < 0.1).

Initially, a single-variable model was estimated for all neighborhood socioeconomic and built environment predictors of trip frequency at the origin and destination zone, separately, with predictors found to be marginally significant ( p < 0.10) retained.

Differences between treatments were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Although marginally significant ( p < 0.10), the effect is directional only and should be interpreted cautiously ( Pritschet et al., 2016 ).

Results of the latent growth model support H3 by showing that customer-serving motive attributions have a significant negative effect on the latent slope of customer satisfaction (H3a: β 22 = –0.126, p < 0.01) and a marginally significant negative effect on the latent slope of willingness to pay more (H3b: β 24 = –0.054, p < 0.10, two-tailed).

However, the difference in estimates between White and Latinx people was marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the estimates for the other two races did not differ significantly from that of White people.

To determine independent predictors for MACE, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was developed with the significant predictors ( P < 0.05) and the marginally significant ones ( P < 0.10) from the univariate model. 3.

Regarding the theta power, the three-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect for electrode location [ F (2, 84) = 133.81, p < 0.01] and a marginally significant interaction between condition and set [ F (6, 84) = 1.95, p < 0.1].

We found that at all stages the protein interaction pairs' absolute Pearson correlation coefficients were larger than the total control at a significant level ( p < 0.001 for N, C, and D) or marginally significant level ( p < 0.1, for E and A).

In the subpopulation with baseline 24-h SBP ≥155 mmHg, the pooled effect of RDN was marginally significant (MD = −2.92 mmHg; 95% CI : −6.36–0.53 mmHg; P = 0.10).

ANOVA on these bacterial PCs detected marginally significant tillage ( p < 0.1) and significant CC ( p < 0.01) main effects from PC1, PC2, and PC3 ( Table 4 ; Figure 1 and Figure 2 ). 3.3.2.

Measures that were at least marginally significant (p=0.10) were retained in the multivariate analyses.

5d,g,h ), with TSSp::FRO6–GFP allele 1 significantly different ( P < 0.05) and allele 2 marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1).

Differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells showed a marginally significant increase in the ZH group compared with the control group (P < 0.1), while no significant differences were found in the Z group (P > 0.1).

In Model I, the mediation effect was not significant (B = 0.004, t = 0.888), while in Model II, the mediation effect was marginally significant (B = 0.012, t = 1.596, p < 0.10).

Two CCS categories—chest pain and skin and subcutaneous tissue infections—showed a significant ( P ≤.05) or marginally significant ( P ≤.10) decrease in presence rates over the years.

AGC 74.7, p = 0.0674) was marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the best/worst difference in surgeon 2 ( p = 0.3960) was not significant.

The difference between these responses was marginally significant ( P = 0.10).

Data for the maximum rate of fall (Figure 4A ) and max-min time (Figure 4D ) are marginally significant at p<0.10.

2009 ), we selected those remaining significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) in the regression model for at least one of the outcome variables in the same set.