“marginally significant”

The current value of physical functioning is significantly associated with the hazard of death (p<0.001), whereas the association between the change rate and mortality is marginally significant (p<0.10).

RUE from InB to A7 only correlated marginally significant with the predictions of canopy A sat at A7 ( R 2 = 0.13, p < 0.1).

Among sister‐only families, the estimated coefficient is larger and marginally significant ( b = 0.0198, p < .1), whereas the association is smaller and not statistically significant among brother‐only families (b = 0.0111, n.s.).

For younger participants, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between the number of fixations made during encoding and subsequent recognition (Pearson's r = 0.18, n = 84, p = 0.10), and a significant positive correlation between the number of transitions and subsequent recognition ( r = 0.41, n = 84, p < 0.001).

To verify this, a dissimilarity test of adonis was carried out, which showed that differences in microbial community compositions were significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) (Table S1).

Results were considered significant when P < .05 and marginally significant when P < .10.

For the perception that respondents are being supported by older relatives, CG was marginally significant only for Future generations ( p < 0.1).

The difference between the auditory and the olfactory conditions was marginally significant ( p <.10).

Significance level <0.05 was considered in all tests, although marginally significant effects ( p -value <0.1) were also considered. 3.

Any variable showing a correlation was further tested in a relevant exploratory regression model to determine if any marginally significant relationship ( P <0.10) was evident.

4 The results of Model 9 in Table 3 showed that the effect of organizational-level HPWS on employee experienced HPWS was marginally significant (Model 9, γ = 0.104, p < 0.1).

We calculated the summary effect estimate using both fixed and random effect models, since the p-value for the test of homogeneity was marginally significant ( Table 3 ; p<0.10), which suggests some heterogeneity may be present and the variance between studies should be incorporated into the analyses to obtain confidence limits.

An a priori significance threshold of α = .05 was used but marginally significant effects ( p < .10) are also reported.

annua , in Experiment II the number of leaves was slightly (marginally significant at p < 0.1) higher, while the number of inflorescences was significantly higher for AM than for NM plants. 2.2.

Additional interesting results from the SEM analysis include a positive and marginally significant effect of physical abuse (CTQ_phyab) on dissociative symptoms (DES_tot, β = .19, p < 0.10), and a significant effect of sexual abuse (CTQ_sexab) on borderline symptomatology (BSL_tot, β = .17, p < 0.05). 3.2.

When the effect was either marginally significant (0.05 < p -value < 0.1) or significant ( p -value < 0.05), multiple means comparison was completed using Fisher’s LSD at the 5% level of significance, and letter groupings were generated.

Unless otherwise noted, statistical analyses were performed using the program SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), and differences were deemed significant when P < 0.05, and marginally significant when P < 0.10.

Multilevel clustering did not affect our point estimates but rendered the observed differences in the years 2014–2017 marginally significant ( p < 0.1 instead of p < 0.05).

glutamic acid (D), proline (K)} had a marginally significant (0.05< p ≤0.10) positive association with elevation, and ten others { e . g . alanine (A), arginine (B), aspartic acid (C), glycine (E), histidine (F), leucine (H), phenylalanine (J), serine (L), threonine (M), and valine (O)} had not appreciable association with elevation ( p >0.10) ( Fig 4 ).

Only in Model B4, the results reported that the interaction between age and social contact network size was marginally significant and positive (Coef. = 0.30, p < .1).

Across all three studies, Benevolence, Security, and Conformity values were significantly less important for vegetarians than they were for non-vegetarians, although the difference for Conformity was marginally significant ( p < .10) in the US study.

We selected marginally significant variables for each model ( P < 0.1) using backwards step-wise regression using the R package vegan ( Zelenı, 2011 ; Oksanen et al., 2015 ).

With regard to H1, the interaction term between social media use and social media information literacy was marginally significant ( b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p < 0.10, Table 3 , second column).

For reasons of clarity, all significant ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant ( p < 0.10) effects are reported in the results section, non-significant effects are mostly omitted.

argentinus , the palate length and upper post-canine length were marginally significant ( P < 0.1), whereas orbit length and diastema length were significant ( P < 0.05), suggesting that these data are non-normally distributed.