“marginally significant”

3a , middle), the prediction allowed a marginally significant distinction of the two groups ( P -value = .0401).

However, statistically, no difference was observed between the damage level for fruit aged 3 and 4 (age3 - age4: P = 0.8393), and a marginally significant difference between ages 3 and 5 (age3 – age5: P = 0.0401) (Fig. 6 A).

There was a marginally significant correlated response in female aggressive behavior when females were deprived of food for 90 min ( F 2,3 = 11.21, p = 0.0405, Figure 2 B).

The difference in BDNF transcripts was comparable to the results obtained from LCM-captured cells, and the applied statistic test (described in Section 4.6.1 ) indicated a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0406) between the two neocortical neuron populations.

Feeding guild was marginally significant in explaining heterogeneity in the data ( I 2 = 93.01, Q M = 14.66, df = 7, p = 0.041; marginal R 2 = 0.015), but only root herbivores (with 4 data points) showed a significant negative effect size (Figure S1 ).

According to the Mann-Whitney U test, difference between chitosan and formocresol was not significant ( P =0.233); difference between chitosan and CMCP was marginally significant, with chitosan showing a greater reduction ( P =0.041, mean ranks: Chitosan=18.77, CMCP=12.23); and there was a marginally significant difference between formocresol and CMCP ( P =0.045, mean ranks: Formocresol=18.73, CMCP=12.27).

The interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 549) = 4.18, p = .041, η p 2 = .01, indicating a stronger out-group effect among rightists ( d = -.34 [-.48, -.22]) than among leftists ( d = -.19 [-.31, -.07]).

As for individual mediation effects, the mediating effects of physical health ( p = .066) and mental health ( p = .076) were marginally significant among women, whereas the mediating effects of cognitive functioning ( p = .041) and physical health ( p = .002) were significant among men.

Among all other populations only Tasmanian flies show a marginally significant among-line variation ( P -value = 0.041).

Medium-GDP remained non-significant (β = 0.452, p = 0.334), and low-GDP was marginally significant (β = 1.416, p = 0.041).

The Pearson correlation analysis showed marginally significant ( p = 0.041–0.076) moderate correlations between the working time values determined using ISO 4049 and FTIR (Fig. 4 ).

We also found a marginally significant ( P = .041) correlation between high expression of this genes’ signature and better OS in patients with endometrial carcinomas.

The month was marginally significant at p = 0.041.

The differences in mean MAFs between tissues were marginally significant between male and female leaves (Mann–Whitney U test, top eQTL, P = 0.041; random eQTL, P = 0.049) and between female leaves and pollen in top eQTLs ( P = 0.049) ( Fig. 4 ).

The levels of protein carbonyls had a marginally significant negative association to the mass of structural tissue ( T = −2.10, p = 0.041) but were not significantly related to masses of any other body compartment or levels of circulating hormone levels.

Comparison of GM_n across different DWMH Fazekas scores Kruskal–Wallis testing revealed a marginally significant group-level difference in GM_n across DWMH Fazekas scores ( p = 0.041).

Interestingly, while no significant relationship was found between CD47 and the clinical factors studied, a marginally significant trend was observed between higher IPI scores and increased EBV positivity (p = 0.041).

Moreover, the OS was longer in the PN group (21.71 ± 5.82 months) than in the PP group (20.01 ± 5.18 months), although the difference was marginally significant (t = 2213.5, P = 0.041).

In addition, the rate of cancer-bearing offspring was higher in the InterVar P or LP carriers than in the others with marginally significant (p = 0.041).

Post hoc analysis (adjusted p for 2 comparisons = .025) showed a decrement of inhibitory performance after the intervention in the control group ( p < .001), but a marginally significant increment in the experimental group ( p = .041; Figure 3 ).

Yet, there was a marginally significant improvement in PFS with atezolizumab compared with placebo in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69 to 0.99; P=0.041; median PFS 13.5 vs. 11.3 months, respectively].

Tajima's D was marginally significant at three locations and in the pooled sample ( D = −1.452, p = 0.041).

The Egger’s regression rest for zero intercept was marginally significant (P = 0.041), providing support for the possibility of publication bias in this effect size measure.

In the relative log(biomass) model (also R 2 = 0.10), the interaction between seed mass and the squared term for heterospecific density was marginally significant ( P = 0.041, Table 4 ) and indicated that light-seeded species exhibited a shallow hump-shaped relationship with heterospecific density whereas heavy-seeded species exhibited a shallow U-shaped relationship (Fig.

Cadmium treatment decreased the size of lab workers, but the extent of the effect differed depending on the level of both habitat and hibernation conditions (marginally significant treatment–habitat–conditions interaction, X 1 = 4.17 p = 0.041, Figure 3 ).