“marginally significant”

There was only a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.04) with higher incidence of TGCTs in CP-treated 129S5 mice than in CP-treated 129S1/SvImJ mice.

Regression analysis showed a small but marginally significant correlation between CaST thresholds and age [r = 0.38, t(21) = 1.88, p < 0.04].

On the contrary, the two SNPs of IGF2BP2 (rs4402960 and rs1470579) showed marginally significant association ( P = 0.040 and 0.048, respectively), only after adjusting for body mass index (BMI), probably indicating BMI's role as possible confounding factor in masking the protective role of this gene against the manifestation of PCOS.

Furthermore, Stroop2 task resulted in a marginally significant negative correlation (R = −0.54, p = 0.04) between the individual task reaction times and the ROI-averaged HbO 2 responses from the PTSD group (See Fig. 8 ) while no significant correlation was seen in the control group.

Pooling the data assessing OS for 2138 patients from all included studies revealed marginally significant difference between CRT and RT alone (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.45-0.98, P = 0.04) and significant between-study heterogeneity ( P = 0.09).

After stratification by sex, there was a marginally significant negative association of SAF with FN‐BMD only in females (β = −0.051; p = .04) in a fully adjusted model.

This overlap was marginally significant compared to the overlap expected by chance (permutation test p value = 0.04).

The results showed that with radical awareness being considered, the effect of Radical Presence became non-significant, p = 0.14, and the effect of Visual Complexity became marginally significant, p = 0.04, η 2 = 0.13.

When analysed according to study design, a significant increase in maternal homocysteine was observed among prospective studies (RoM: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14–1.44, P = 3.2 × 10 −5 ), with a marginally significant effect among retrospective studies (RoM = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.14, P = 0.04) ( Figure 1 ).

Another SNP rs10941679 showed a marginally significant association after adjusting for age and sex in the additive genetic model (adjusted OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01-2.04, p = 0.040).

The thinnest pachymetry and anterior chamber depth showed a marginally significant difference between the baseline and the first consecutive scan (9.3 μ and 0.03 mm, respectively, P = 0.04).

The overall effect of treatment was not found to be significant for hydroxycarbamide ( p = 0.23) but was marginally significant for donor A ( p = 0.04).

We observed marginally significant interactions between diabetes and rs10486567 in JAZF1 (P = 0.04) and between BMI and rs10486567 (P = 0.03).

The enrichment of A-T mutations is marginally significant (p = 0.04 for the comparison of these observed A-T mutations with human-chimpanzee differences and p = 0.03 for the comparison with human polymorphisms, Fisher exact test) and merits re-examination when more human Y mutations are identified.

Pooling autosomal mutations to compare against X mutations revealed a marginally significant difference in the autosomal versus X rate in PB306 ( P = 0.04, X 2 test) but not in the other three MA lines sets (0.30 < P < 0.86, X 2 tests).

As expected based on the selection criteria, the clinicopathological screening, including immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM), assessed as indicators of potential immune activation, did not reveal any values outside the reference intervals in either age group, despite a marginally significant ( p = 0.040) trend toward lower hematocrit (Ht) values and a significantly higher concentration of globulin fractions in older animals, resulting in a reduced albumin-to-globulin ratio, as previously reported in the literature [ 15 , 49 , 50 ].

In C1/2 recipients, reduction of NRM by ATG was less pronounced, yet marginally significant, if all ATG doses were included (RR, 0.61; p = 0.04; n = 363), and was slightly more pronounced if only the lower ATG dose levels were considered (RR, 0.56; p = 0.026; n = 320).

In addition, we detected a marginally significant sex-by-diet interaction at hatching ( F 2,480 = 3.27, P = 0.04) but the effect was not present in the next few developmental stages ( F ≤2.11, P ≥0.11 for the next three stages).

350–400-ms Time Window ANOVA revealed a marginally significant three-way interaction effect between stimulus type, visual field and hemisphere [F (4,120) = 2.61, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.08].

An additional three test results were marginally significant: “aspartic-type peptidase activity” ( Z = 1.75, p = 0.040, q = 0.060), “ATP:ADP antiporter activity” ( Z = 1.54, p = 0.062, q = 0.083), and total proportion of carnivory-associated functions ( Z = 1.79, p = 0.036, q = 0.060).

Genes DUSP10, NUDT1 and PPTRE showed marginally significant reduction ( p = 0.04), and gene DUSP11 showed more pronounced reduction beyond control ( p = 0.003).

Both strains had a marginally significant methanol-specific growth effect at 24 h with an increase of 22% for BY4741 (p = 0.04) and an increase of 23% for CEN.PK (p = 0.05) ( Fig. 2 A and 2B).

Marginally significant differences were found when comparing the mean TTR in 2013 to 2017 ( p = 0.04) and between 2013 and 2021 ( p = 0.02).

Moreover, the marginally significant difference in PVD at baseline ( P = 0.04) represents a limitation of the present study.

Finally, the potential overlap of participants in the studies included in our meta‐analysis may have contributed to the marginally significant findings of plasma Aβ42 between the DS with and without AD groups ( z = 2.03, p = 0.04). 4.2 Tau In this meta‐analysis, we examined two forms of tau and found no significant differences in plasma t‐tau (non‐phosphorylated tau) and p‐tau181 (phosphorylated tau) concentrations between the DS population and the euploid controls.