Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp -value = 0.040.8× alphagold
Although we observed a marginally significant effect of anxiolytic medications ( p -value = 0.04), we did not find any evidence of a confounding effect of anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs on either anxiety or depression at T0 ( p -value = 0.517 and 0.762, respectively) or sleep problems at T0 ( p -value = 0.82 and 0.62, respectively).
marginally significantp = .040.8× alphagold
Further analysis of data subsets with similar age distribution across the three ethnicity groups (Pearson's Chi‐square test) revealed a marginally significant ( p = .04) trend toward more frequent hospitalization for Hispanic or Black/African American plasma donors in comparison to White/Caucasian American plasma donors ( Table S1 ), despite the underrepresentation of elderly donors in this subpopulation.
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
There was no target difference over time for the linear trends using the mixed effect model ( p = 0.70), while there were some marginally significant differences between the two target groups compared to baseline at 2 years ( p = 0.04) and at 7 years ( p = 0.05), with more reduction in LEDD in the STN group.
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Hypsodonty shows no relationship with time in either clade ( Table S4 , Dataset S2 ), but ANCOVA shows the observed difference in the intercepts is marginally significant ( p = 0.04, Figure S5 , Table S3 ), meaning that Karnimata species have higher tooth crowns than the “ Progonomys clade”.
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
The slope estimates did not differ significantly from zero for women in the three youngest age groups ( p > 0.25), and there was a marginally significant decrease in rates for women 35–39 years of age ( p = 0.04).
DDT and Breast Cancer Trends.
Environ Health Perspect · 2008 · PMC2535637
marginally significantp = .040.8× alphagold
Follow-up RM-ANOVAs demonstrated (a) a significant interaction between emotion and face action for both posing [ F (5.18, 341.52) = 37.65, p < .001, η p 2 = .36] and spoken [ F (5.52, 364.20) = 13.45, p < .001, η p 2 = .17] conditions, (b) a significant Emotion × Condition interaction for all face areas (all p s < .05; though the interaction for nose lengthening was marginally significant, p = .04), and (c) a significant Face Action × Condition interaction for happy [ F (2.94, 193.76) = 214.92, p < .001, η p 2 = .77], angry [ F (2.98, 196.62) = 393.56, p < .001, η p 2 = .86], and sad [ F (2.88, 189.95) = 255.84, p < .001, η p 2 = .80].
marginally significantP = 0.040.8× alphagold
Recently, a large-scale retrospective study ( n = 1048) based on National Cancer Database showed preoperative radiotherapy contributed to a prolonged OS with a marginally significant P value (log-rank P = 0.04), compared with patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy [ 19 ].