“marginally significant”

8D ), associations of Mushu and Aster with IBD diagnosis remained marginally significant ( P -value = 0.04), while Roos and Lelie associations lost significance ( P -value > 0.05).

There was a marginally significant trend towards fright response (boldness) being consistent over time (P = 0.04; q = 0.07).

The correlation between age and the result of the VNT test is low (c = 0.17), but marginally significant ( p = 0.04).

In particular, the N400 was attenuated to angry compared to happy and neutral voices in all regions ( p < .001), although the angry-neutral contrast was marginally significant ( p = .040) in the occipital region.

When each of the SNPs was analysed separately, marginally significant differences were observed for allele frequencies between sporadic cases and controls for three consecutive SNPs (−1001C/T, −263G/A, and −13C/T, P =0.04–0.07).

At the second step of the analysis, adding the emotional burden of loneliness significantly increased predicted variance in depression symptoms by 4.7% and the effect of loneliness frequency scores was reduced but remained marginally significant (β = 0.141, p = .04).

There was no significant difference in detecting IgM and IgG with Biolidics LFI and ELISA at D0 and D7 ( p = 1.00), except for marginally significant detection of IgM at D7 ( p = 0.04).

Furthermore, Stroop2 task resulted in a marginally significant negative correlation (R = −0.54, p = 0.04) between the individual task reaction times and the ROI-averaged HbO 2 responses from the PTSD group (See Fig. 8 ) while no significant correlation was seen in the control group.

Between-group weighted UniFrac distances were significant for vulture species (PERMANOVA F 4,56 = 3.78, R 2 = 0.20, P < 0.001), marginally significant for plumage tracts ( F 1,56 = 2.51, R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.04), but were non-significant for the interaction, vulture species × plumage tract ( F 4,56 = 0.90, R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.57).

A marginally significant difference was observed in median plasma glucose values between COBAS (5.8 mmol/L; IQR, 5.0–6.6 mmol/L) and dipstick (5.6 mmol/L; IQR, 5.6–6.9 mmol/L; p=0.040), whilst no significant difference could be observed in median plasma bilirubin levels between COBAS (11.2 μmol/L; IQR, 6.6–22.0 μmol/L) and dipstick (8.6 μmol/L; IQR, 8.6–34.2 μmol/L; p=0.090), respectively.

Adjusted OR for an independent functional outcome for delays >8 minutes was marginally significant at 2.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 4.1, P = 0.04) based on mRS 0–2 but insignificant using mRS 0-1 at 1.2 (95% CI 0.6 to 2.4, P = 0.68).

A formal statistical assessment (interaction group×time) revealed that MP‐FF was the only MRI marker demonstrating a marginally significant progression in SMA outpatients as compared to HV from baseline to week 52 ( F (3, 63) = 2.887, P = 0.04).

Fisher’s combined probability test did not show statistically significant evidence for association ( P = 0.54); yet, Stouffer’s Z score method which considers the direction of association showed a marginally significant collective evidence for association with SDR at these 34 loci ( P = 0.04).

Sex, expressed as the percentage of a model-building group that was male participants, was marginally significant and low fit (p = 0.04, r 2 = 0.01).

We found that both the decrease in sensory information and the increase in categorical coding across cortical areas were well explained by their anatomical hierarchical level ( P ≤ 1 × 10 −5 for both), with only a marginally significant difference between them ( P = 0.04).

Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.

The statistical analysis indicated that there was no statistically significant effect in the mPFC (maxT = 2.12, p = 0.11), and a marginally significant overall effect in the latPFC (maxT = 2.45, p = 0.040).

Thus, female broods were more heavily provisioned than male or sex-unknown broods ( p = 0.06 marginally significant for female vs. male brood and p = 0.04 for female vs. sex-unknown brood; S5 Fig ; Table D in S5 File ).

The correlation coefficient between the parasites abundance and the geographic distance between locations was low and marginally significant ( r = .434, p ‐value = .04).

Differences in genetic diversity across populations were marginally nonsignificant when heterozygosity was considered ( F 5,35 = 2.32, P = 0.06) and marginally significant for allelic richness ( F 5,35 = 2.58, P = 0.04).

The enrichment was marginally significant in genes (1.03-fold, P = 0.04) and we noted a significant depletion of differentially methylated CpGs in promoters (0.86-fold, P = 4.3 × 10 −10 ) (Figure 2 E).

It is pertinent to mention here that FSI reduction was observed at the 3-month follow-up in both test groups, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.04).

The results showed that with radical awareness being considered, the effect of Radical Presence became non-significant, p = 0.14, and the effect of Visual Complexity became marginally significant, p = 0.04, η 2 = 0.13.

Hypsodonty shows no relationship with time in either clade ( Table S4 , Dataset S2 ), but ANCOVA shows the observed difference in the intercepts is marginally significant ( p = 0.04, Figure S5 , Table S3 ), meaning that Karnimata species have higher tooth crowns than the “ Progonomys clade”.

faecalis , we found a marginally significant increase in non-ICU departments (from 86.7% in 2013 to 90.6% in 2018; p = 0.04, data not shown), whereas no significant trend was observed among other subgroups (i.e. age, sex, region, hospital size and hospital type).