“marginally significant”

Analyses of the contrasts of physically different saturation levels (LS versus HS) did not yield any significant regions associated with D 2 BP ND values of any subdivisions of striatum, but the D 2 BP ND value of left executive striatum in the objective faded condition (LS) versus the objective vivid condition (HS) contrast correlated with the left parietal cortex (left inferior parietal lobule (BA 40)) at a marginally significant level (cluster level of p = 0.08, FDR corrected), which overlapped with the left parietal cortex found in subjective faded condition (overlapped region was presented in Supplementary Fig.

There was a significant difference in sessile polychaete biomass among treatments (One-way ANOVA, p = 0.03), and post-hoc tests revealed a significant difference between the low-density aquaculture and natural treatments (Tukey’s post-hoc test, p = 0.03), a marginally significant difference between high-density aquaculture and natural (p = 0.08), and no difference between low- and high- density aquaculture (p = 0.89; Table 1 ; Fig 3B ).

However, results for experimental studies using these effect sizes suggested only a marginally significant 15% ( p = 0.08) increase in the odds of a police‐reported repeat incident, compared to a statistically significant 22% increase in the original analysis.

However, the difference in overall survival was marginally significant either between ypT0 and ypT2/3 (P=0.08) or between ypT0 and ypT1 patients (P=0.051).

The full model explains 18.5% of the variance in five-week stress changes and provides a marginally significant improvement ( p = 0.08) over the control model but is not significantly different from the main effects model ( p = 0.96).

The recruitment was significantly predicted by a combination of RNA as a positive predictor (Wald statistics = 45.21, p < 0.0001) and SOD as a marginally significant negative predictor (Wald statistics = 2.84, p > 0.08), with no significant effects of either species or diets.

Using a linear-by-linear association test, we found a marginally significant relationship between cluster and repeat count category (LxL 2 = 3.03, p = 0.08).

Moreover, we only detected a marginally significant difference in the proportion of adults along the day (ANOVA, F Survey = 2.51, df = 2, p = 0.08) due to differences in surveys at 12 p.m. compared to other surveys (see Figs. 2 and S1.3 ).

The third-grade group showed only a marginally significant difference among hit rates, which were also higher for hands than for faces ( Z = −1.751; P = 0.08).

This association was marginally significant for caregiver report ( p = 0.08).

When the personal income per US state and Gini index were controlled, the negative association remained marginally significant (worldwide: r (41) = -.270, p = .080; US: r (46) = -.281, p = .053).

Only one C8161 tumor showed significant differences ( p = 0.01), and one of the three A375P tumors showed marginally significant differences between cell densities in OA and RA ( p = 0.080).

The multivariate model ( Table 2 ) indicated that the rate of change in CD4+CD38+HLA-DR+% (activated) was marginally significant by CMV status (p = 0.08 for CMV status by week interaction).

The interaction between context and pre-/post-pain was marginally significant ( F (1, 56) = 2.56, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.08).

Repeating the analysis for nucleotide sequences we find marginally significant differences (p < 0.08; sign test).

S1 A ) as well as medication-induced change in MDS-UPDRS score (i.e., PD-ON UPDRS – PD-OFF UPDRS ) in a marginally significant manner ( r = −0.34, P = 0.08, Pearson ’s correlation); this relationship was significant after removal of one outlier, defined by 3 SDs of group mean, ( r = −0.45, P = 0.01, Pearson ’s correlation, SI Appendix , Fig.

Based on this analysis, the effects of sampling days on the microbial richness and evenness were not significant for the control group ( p > 0.05) and marginally significant for the combined treatment group ( p = 0.08).

A wilcoxon signed rank test on residuals indicates that asterids I are marginally significant ( p = 0.08) for lacking diversity (two sided, μ = 0) but other groups (gymnosperms, p = 0.25; magnoliids, p = 0.20; rosids I, p = 0.97; rosids II, p = 0.63; asterids II, p = 0.63) show no detectable biases in diversity.

Post-hoc tests controlling for multiple testing found that speakers show a significant inverse relation of pupil size slope and frequency slope ( p < 0.005) and recipients show a marginally significant direct relation of pupil size slope and frequency slope ( p = 0.08).

However, they showed marginally significant differences in the post-TSST measure, t (78) = 1.75, p = 0.08, Cohen’s d = 0.4, with Excess weight participants performing significantly poorer than Normal weight controls.

The NISs GPA was found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

M low-conformity = 17.11%; F(1, 150) = 10.08, p < 0.01), and importantly, a marginally significant two-way interaction (F(1, 150) = 3.04, p = 0.08; Fig. 5 ).

Mean sICAM-1 concentrations were marginally significant between AMI patients and healthy controls (p-value = 0.08), whereas mean concentrations of sICAM-1 among different blood groups were similar (p-value = 0.539) ( Table-III ).

3B ), with the P -values of the interaction between location and food was marginally significant ( P = 0.08).

Paired t -tests revealed that participants in the intervention condition demonstrated significant pre–post-intervention increases in the integral values of the front PFC ( t (46) = 2.21, P = 0.03, Cohen’s d = 0.37) and right PFC ( t (49) = 2.10, P = 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.32) and marginally significant increases in the left PFC ( t (50) = 1.76, P = 0.08, Cohen’s d = 0.26).