“marginally significant”

The statistics is marginally significant (two side rank sum test p = 0.08).

The model with age and gender was marginally significant, F (2,132) = 2.57, p = 0.08, and explained 3.8% of the variance in BAT behavior.

In addition, the main effect of Arousal was marginally significant, F (1, 70) = 3.15, p = 0.08, η 2 p = 0.04, with higher accuracy for high arousal targets ( M = 0.97, SD = 0.09) than for low arousal targets ( M = 0.94, SD = 0.01), suggesting a trend toward a facilitative effect of emotional arousal (Figure 3 ).

Modality was marginally significant [ F (3,93) = 2.22, p = 0.08], with the AV-lag condition resulting in larger MEPs ( z -score = 0.076 ± 0.07) than the other conditions ( z -scores; A: 0.008 ± 0.065, V: -0.083 ± 0.06, AV: -0.01 ± 0.06).

Cortisol awakening response was marginally significant for yoga (p=0.08).

Marginally significant correlations were found between CN and rooting depth ( r 2 =0.34, P =0.08 and r 2 =0.10, P =0.2261) and root length density ( r 2 =0.28, P =0.1016 and r 2 =0.31, P =0.0896) in deep soil for primary and seminal roots, respectively ( Supplementary Fig.

Where there was a marginally significant ( p = 0.08) decrease in the proportion of corrective‐saccades from block 2 (estimated marginal mean −0.07, SE 0.04) to block 3 (estimated marginal mean −0.13, SE 0.04) and between block 2 and block 4 (estimated marginal mean −0.20, SE 0.06; p = 0.06).

Post hoc analyses indicated that laypersons (mean 1.50, SD 0.71) reported significantly lower knowledge than students (mean 3.50, SD 0.71; P =.04) and psychotherapists (mean 5.00, SD 0; P =.01), with the last 2 groups having a marginally significant difference from each other ( P =.08).

Moreover, the Sobel test showed that the mediating effect of cultural values was marginally significant, Z = 1.77, p = 0.08 ( Figure 3A ).

The association between mortality and mean temperature for 1–13 August was marginally significant ( p = 0.08), with an OR of 1.71 (for a 0.37°C increase: 95% CI: 0.94, 3.11).

attenuata WT ( P < 0.05), between irPMT and WT ( P < 0.05), and marginally significant between irPMT and ISWT plants ( P = 0.08).

Correlations with pathogen-related marker diversity Molecular marker diversity detected on surfaces showed marginally significant positive correlations with forest cover (r 2 = 0.42; p = 0.08) and grassland (r 2 = 0.41; p = 0.09).

This association was marginally significant in the female-only subsample [ F (1,31) = 3.4, p = 0.08, ΔR 2 = 7%].

Analysing each of the soundscape scales individually through a factorial ANCOVA test found a marginally significant result for the calmness scale ( df = 1, F = 9.91, p = 0.08).

Interaction effect The interaction effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.08) for lower frequencies; however, since establishing a possible interaction between context and word class was one of the central issues behind this work, we also tested the simple effects.

We found a marginally significant relationship between insula RTOP values and individuals’ cognitive control abilities (Canonical correlation, Pillai’s trace = 0.20, p=0.08).

The clinical complaint composite score was found to be marginally significant (F (1,121) = 3.21, p = 0.08) and was therefore initially kept in the model.

The ART group experienced a reduction in weekly income from a mean of 33,775 Ush at baseline to 29,481 Ush at month 6, which was marginally significant ( P = .08), but then increased to an average weekly income of 38,516 Ush at month 12; this change from month 6 to 12 was also marginally significant ( P = .08), but the income level at month 12 was now back to an equivalent level as that at baseline ( P = .81).

The last row in Table 5 shows that the three second-order polynomial terms are marginally significant ( F = 2.29, p = 0.08).

Repeating the analysis for nucleotide sequences we find marginally significant differences (p < 0.08; sign test).

Levels of perceived stress, t (31) = −1.87, P = .07; and negative affect t (32) = −1.91, P = .06; were marginally significant ( P values < .08) at the follow-up compared to baseline.

For 1:1 mappings in the first familiarization, we found a marginally significant positive correlation ( R = 0.225, p = 0 .08, N = 60) between accuracy and confidence ratings.

Connections to the sensorimotor cortex were marginally significant ( p = 0.08) with greater connectivity again in the low compared to the high mindfulness groups.

Tumor grade was marginally significant ( P value = 0.08). 4.2.

Post-hoc analysis identified a marginally significant reduction in negative PANAS score over time in the MBSR group, specifically between session 2 and session 6 ( β = −5.42, SE = 1.93, p = .08; Supplementary Fig.