Follow-up analyses for each time-bin indicated that the Group effect was significant for the first and second time-bin ( F (2,28) = 15.6, 6.9, p s < .01), marginally significant for the third time-bin ( F (2,28) = 2.8, p = .08), and non-significant for the last two time-bins ( p s > .1).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Verification of previous findings The correlation between perceived–actual discrepancy and left anterior insula was marginally significant ( β = 0.41, p = 0.08), whereas that between perceived–ideal discrepancy and right temporoparietal junction was not significant ( β = 0.01, p = 0.78).
Ammonium chloride, ammonium hydroxide, ammonium phosphate, and ammonium sulfate increased the ammonium content of the media ( t = 6.31, 3.85, 6.79, and 7.10, respectively, df = 12, P < 0.05) whereas ammonium bicarbonate produced a marginally significant increase ( t = 2.64, df = 12, P = 0.08).
Only the main effect of the side was marginally significant ( F (1,11) = 3.72 , p = .08).
There was a marginally significant main effect of the preceding trial type [ F (1, 17) = 3.45, p = .08, η 2 = .03], a significant main effect of the FA type [ F (1, 17) = 15.00, p = .001, η 2 = .10], and a significant interaction between two factors [ F (1, 17) = 24.359, p < .001, η 2 = .20].
A paired t -test comparing the average power of the precentral gyrus ROI between PD OFF and PD ON showed a marginally significant difference with decreased power in PD ON compared to PD OFF [ t (23) = 1.81, p = 0.08, Figure A2 ].
There was a marginally significant positive correlation between anxiety before the consultation and OHIS ( r =0.18; P =.08), suggesting that patients who report higher anxiety levels might engage more in OHIS.
Encapsulation of directly accessible interior caulk yielded a marginally significant (p = 0.08) reduction in the normalized median indoor air PCB concentration (22%, 282 to 220 ng/m 3 ).
There was a marginally significant correlation between serum prealbumin and LOS, both preoperatively (β = −0.66; 95% CI: −1.42 to −0.10; p = 0.08) and on the second postoperative day (β = −1.37; 95% CI: −2.87 to 0.11; p = 0.06).
A marginal difference between Conditions was observed on ΔFST_incongruent ( χ 2 (2) = 5.33, p = 0.07), with the synchronization condition showing a marginally significant trend toward better performance than the asynchronization condition ( t = 2.27, p = 0.08).
Finally, we observed a marginally significant interaction effect for social support, F (1, 58) = 3.104, p = 0.08, with an increase and decrease seen in the intervention and control children, respectively.
There was no significant association between Heartbeat Perception Task score and state anxiety ( r = 0.17, p = 0.31), but a marginally significant correlation was found between the heartbeat perception score and the level of trait anxiety ( r = 0.28, p = 0.08).
In this school-level OLS regression model ( N = 20), the interaction term was marginally significant (B = −0.08, p = 0.08).
Separate one-way ANOVAs showed that the difference was marginally significant for TT ( F (2,50) = 2.69, P = 0.08) and significant for CDT ( F (2,50) = 3.35, P < 0.05), but not for SRT ( F (2,50) = 0.05, P = 0.96).
Consistent with the prediction, we find a marginally significant difference in publication month ( t = 2.2, p = 0.08) in the expected direction between papers for which sequences were never submitted to GenBank and those for which sequences were submitted but accession numbers were not printed.
Additionally, there were minimal differences observed between the normalized post-drive postural sway metrics for the closed test track study and this on-road study (only M/L RMS sway velocity was marginally significant at p = 0.08), suggesting that the in-vehicle exposures scale similarly.
In fact, there was a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.080) between closeness and the group/personal discrepancy in the prediction of national identification that was negative rather than positive.
The clinical complaint composite score was found to be marginally significant (F (1,121) = 3.21, p = 0.08) and was therefore initially kept in the model.
neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.
A similar pattern of marginally significant association was observed with DBP reactivity ( B = −.004, SE = .002, p = .08; model R 2 = .10, p = .07; Figure 2 b).
Concerning avoidance behavior, there was only a marginally significant, but inconclusive effect of health anxiety during COVID-19 on avoidance behavior in relation to other diseases ( b = 0.03, 99% CI [−0.01, 0.06], p = 0.08).
The model with age and gender was marginally significant, F (2,132) = 2.57, p = 0.08, and explained 3.8% of the variance in BAT behavior.
Leptin and leptin receptor levels and genotypes We found that 5′-UTR LEP polymorphism (rs13228377) correlates with serum leptin levels, with AA genotype related to increased leptin level independent of asthma status, although the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.08).
Ordinal logistic regression showed a significant positive association of concordance with symptom severity (Z = 2.59, OR = 1.007 [1.002-1.013], P = .010) and a marginally significant negative association with DPI (Z = −1.78, P = .08).
Moreover, we have found a marginally significant timepoint (heart rate before the film vs heart rate after the film) x film group (trauma vs control) interaction effect, F 1,64 = 3.12, p = 0.08.