Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Furthermore, a marginally significant difference in the number of MR-1 cells was observed among diphenyl Pt- thiosemicarbazone complex treatment groups (p = 0.077), and an increasing trend in the number of cells was noted from ~5.0 × 10 8 cells (methanol control group) to ~5.8 × 10 8 cells (20ppm).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
N2 (200–300 ms) Analyses on N2 amplitude revealed only a marginally significant main effect of the trait’s gender preference, ( F (1,32) = 3.33, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.09), but the main effect of the stereotype compatibility ( F (1,32) = 1.01, p = 0.32) and the main effect of participant’s gender ( F (1,32) = 0.04, p = 0.85) were not significant.
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
The simple-effects test showed that the P3a amplitude under high-calorie food in the NPSS-F group was much larger than that under low-calorie food ( p = 0.043), and the P3a amplitude in the control group under low-calorie food was larger (marginally significant) than that in the NPSS-F group ( p = 0.077) and the obese group ( p = 0.058).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
2.7 Mutual Facilitation of the Two Teaching Phases To test the relation between the two teaching phases, we calculated correlation between the predicted knowledge structure generated by the MFC activity during the lecturing phase and the knowledge structure actually recalled by students during the recalling phase of the LH condition, and obtained a marginally significant correlation ( t (14) = 1.911, p = 0.077, Cohen's d = 0.493, 95% CI of the difference = [−0.052, 1.023]; Figure 7 A,B ).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Of critical interest were paths ab (i.e., the indirect effects of daydreaming on social adaptation via loneliness), which were significant for daydreams that made participants feel more connected (β = 0.12, SE = 0.06, p = 0.047, 95% CI[0.02, 0.22]) and positive (β = 0.14, SE = 0.06, p = 0.033, 95% CI[0.03, 0.24]), marginally significant for daydreams that made participants feel less lonely (β = –0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.077, 95% CI[–0.24, –0.01]), and were more positive in content (β = 0.16, SE = 0.07, p = 0.013, 95% CI[0.06, 0.27]), and less fanciful (β = –0.19, SE = 0.09, p = 0.024, 95% CI[–0.35, –0.05]).