“marginally significant”

Consistently, significant positive correlations were found between PANSS-G and the Frontal-Inf-Orb-R (r = 0.55, p = 0.006), PANSS-G and the Rolandic-Oper-R (r = 0.44, p = 0.047), and marginally significant correlation between PANSS-N and the Rolandic-Oper-R (r = 0.38, p = 0.076).

However, this relationship is marginally significant ( p -value = 0.076).

A binomial test contrasting the observed distribution of p values against a null of .33 power was statistically significant ( p = .032) for the main test and marginally significant ( p = .076) for the robustness test, confirming this extreme flatness.

The main effect of neuroticism on the hands-on-steering-wheel time was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 3.310, p = 0.076].

The change in destructive leadership showed marginally significant individual variability (slope σ 2 = 0 0.012, p = 0.076).

The posterior region (LH: CHs 5, 7, 10; RH: CHs 15, 18, 20) had a significant main effect of age, F (1, 19) = 4.82, p = .041, partial η 2 = .20, and condition, F (1, 19) = 6.53, p = .004, partial η 2 = .26, and a marginally significant interaction effect between age and hemisphere, F (1, 19) = 3.51, p = .076, partial η 2 = .16 (all other p s ≥ .22).

Group V showed significant improvements in the processing speed ( P = 0.048) and working memory ( P = 0.048) composites as well as marginally significant improvements in the executive function ( P = 0.076) and COGSTAT ( P = 0.076) composites.

A significant interaction effect between Group and Emotion revealed that ALEX, as compared to NonALEX, showed significantly stronger FAA in the anger condition [ F (1,46) = 4.302, P = 0.044, η p 2 = 0.086, 95% CI: 0.020, 1.307], and a marginally significant weaker FAA in the sadness condition [ F (1,46) = 3.297, P = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.067, 95% CI: −1.578, 0.081].

Patient-centered care was marginally significant ( P = .0764).

CDE: 0.7805 ± 0.2826 , t 41 = 2.4221 , p = 0.0199 , and d = 0.7301 ) states, while post hoc within-group analysis revealed a significant increase in β for YC ( t 23 = 2.9613 and p = 0.0070 , and d = 0.5845 ) but not in the CDE group, as for the latter the difference was marginally significant ( t 18 = 1.8776 , p = 0.0767 , and d = 0.4125 ).

These results show that marginally significant trends exist in the results of men ( p = 0.0769) and women ( p = 0.0788), respectively.

Site‐level variation was marginally significant for NWLS (Estimate = 1.37, p = 0.077), suggesting slightly higher detection rates at this site.

The higher vegetable group reported a greater increase in hunger satisfaction ( P =0.005 interaction) with a marginally significant decrease in score by the control group from 6 to 12 months ( P =0.077).

Given that the post hoc analysis complements the main analysis, and considering that a p value of less than 0.1 may indicate a meaningful trend, the positive association between Solution 1b and turnover intention is considered marginally significant (Solution 1b: B = 1.729, p = 0.077).

ANOVA analysis revealed marginally significant differences in SAS-SV scores across academic years (F = 2.299, p = 0.077), with second-year students having the highest mean scores (32.55 ± 8.98).

A marginally significant difference in the density of CD4 + T cells was observed across the LymphGen subtypes ( P = .077), with the MCD subtype showing lower CD4 + cell counts per square millimeter and with the EZB subtype exhibiting higher counts ( supplemental Figure 15 A).

IAT scores showed a marginally significant weak correlation [ r (40) = 0.283, p = 0.077, 95% CI (−0.031, 0.547)] with our explicit measure of meat disgust.

Both the crude and adjusted odds ratios for a high TG/HDL-C ratio were significantly lower in the light, moderate and heavy drinker groups compared with a reference level of 1.00, except for the crude odds ratio of heavy drinkers, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.077).

darkness anxiety facial expression face memory The main effect of lighting condition was marginally significant, F (1, 41) = 3.29, p = 0.077, η 2 = 0.001.

A marginally significant relationship was observed with intensity collapsed happiness ( r (97) = −0.179, p = 0.077, CI = [−0.363, 0.019]) but this comparison did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. 2.2.3.

This effect was significant for feeder connections ( P < 0.001), and marginally significant for peripheral connections ( P = 0.077).

The results indicate marginally significant effects of supervisors’ safety commitment on the slope of uncertainty plotted with self-control ( γ = − 0.43, p = 0.077) and marginally significant effects on the slope of self-control plotted with PsyCap ( γ = 0.35, p =0.058).

Drum breaks performed at 120 BPM showed higher ratings than those at 150 BPM (marginally significant, p = 0.077).

We found significant models for phonology ( r = 0.29, P = 0.007), semantics ( r = 0.20, P = 0.050), marginally significant for fluency ( r = 0.17, P = 0.077) but not significant for executive function ( r = 0.003, ns).

When directly compared, the excess intrusion rate (i.e., after subtracting the chance rate) observed with related-inconsistent pairs showed a marginally significant increase over the excess intrusion rate observed with unrelated-inconsistent pairs (t(18) = 1.49, p = 0.077).