Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
A repeated measures ANOVA on RTs showed a significant load effect [ F (1,17) = 97.64, MS e = 3791.33, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.85], a significant reward effect [ F (2,34) = 13.13, MS e = 639.96, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.44], and a marginally significant interaction between them [ F (2,32) = 2.77, MS e = 662.64, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.14].
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
In the multivariable analysis with adjustment for history of smoking in addition to age, gender, BMI, hemoglobin A1c and history of alcohol drinking, there was a marginally significant difference in ABI values (p = 0.077) of the 1st and 3rd tertiles for pteridines ( Fig. 3 A). 3.7 Odds ratios vs the. 1st tertile group of pteridines for low ABI and high d-dimer in uni- and multivariable analyses The results of logistic regression analysis for the relationships of pteridine level with low ABI and high d-dimer are shown in Table 4 .
marginally significantP = 0.0771.5× alphagold
In effect, we found a significant difference between the P−A− condition ( M = 355, SD = 65) and the P−A+ ( M = 338, SD = 57, P = 0.009) and the P + A− ( M = 334, SD = 67, P = 0.036) conditions as well as a marginally significant difference between the P−A− and the P + A+ condition ( M = 343, SD = 69.99, P = 0.077).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Of critical interest were paths ab (i.e., the indirect effects of daydreaming on social adaptation via loneliness), which were significant for daydreams that made participants feel more connected (β = 0.12, SE = 0.06, p = 0.047, 95% CI[0.02, 0.22]) and positive (β = 0.14, SE = 0.06, p = 0.033, 95% CI[0.03, 0.24]), marginally significant for daydreams that made participants feel less lonely (β = –0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.077, 95% CI[–0.24, –0.01]), and were more positive in content (β = 0.16, SE = 0.07, p = 0.013, 95% CI[0.06, 0.27]), and less fanciful (β = –0.19, SE = 0.09, p = 0.024, 95% CI[–0.35, –0.05]).