“marginally significant”

A marginally significant positive slope in the meta-analysis ( p = 0.07) suggested the possibility of such a tendency.

We found a significant and positive correlation between γ and Self-Concept Clarity (r(81) = 0.345, 95% CI [0.139, 0.521], p = 0.001) and a marginally significant and positive correlation between γ and Self-Esteem (r(81) = 0.198, 95% CI [−0.018, 0.396], p = 0.07).

Air temperature had a small but non-zero effect on the foraging probability of males with a marginally significant positive linear relationship (effective degrees of freedom [edf] = 0.71, χ 2 = 4.33, p = 0.07), whereas the effect was small and non-significant in females (edf = 0.41, χ 2 = 0.67, p = 0.23) (Fig. 5 C).

In ACUTE-COVID, T1 had significantly more symptoms than T2 ( M = 5.3, SD = 3.1 and M = 4.3, SD = 2.6 respectively, p =.002) while the difference with T3 was marginally significant ( p =.07).

Also, there was a marginally significant reduction in the final values of pelvic pain (P = 0.07).

Further analysis showed that no significant difference in linear trend was found for the group that received sumatriptan first, but in the group that received placebo first, a marginally significant linear trend effect was noted (t = 2.039, two-sided p = 0.07, one-sided p = 0.04) (See table 3 ) Discussion Our results show that overall sumatriptan has no significant ability to provoke alcohol lsymptoms or to cause a desire or craving for alcohol.

We found that T cell expansion had a marginally significant positive association with the outcome in the combined model ( p = 0.07), while the CAR T cell peak did not contribute meaningfully ( p = 0.79).

Furthermore, the interaction between Stimulus and Updating approached significance (β = 0.599, p = 0.071) , and the three-way interaction of Stimulus × Trial × Updating also demonstrated a marginally significant effect (β = -0.155, p = 0.070) (see Table 3 ).

The moderating role of mental health literacy on the relationship between psychological vulnerability and adolescent anxiety was left marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

The interactions between graduate institutions and internship enterprises were marginally significant ( F (1, 31) = 3.60, p = 0.070, η 2 p = 0.09, and 95%CI [−0.038, 7.383]).

A Chi‐square test comparing misreports across conditions was marginally significant, χ 2 (2) = 5.32, p = 0.070.

A marginally significant trend was also observed for increased use of medications for diabetes (5.8% vs . 2.6%; p = 0.07).

The relation tended to be marginally significant and negative in classes with high classroom group-oriented norm ( p = 0.07) but not significant in classes with low classroom group-oriented norm ( p = 0.30).

A negative correlation was seen between age and the frequency of engagement, that is, as participant age increased, their engagement frequency decreased by 1.85 units, a relationship that was marginally significant ( P =.07) (see Table 2 ).

Post-hoc tests found a marginally significant difference between language groups when in the mismatched interrogative condition (β = 1.08, SE = 0.59, z = 1.84, p = 0.07) but not in other conditions.

Similar results were obtained, with the addition that higher total family income became a marginally significant correlate of increased average vaccination likelihood ( p = .07).

In the logistic regression model, individuals in the PmPPF group were more likely to have a UIP pattern compared to the non‐PmPPF group, and this effect was marginally significant (odds ratio [OR] = 4.44, P = 0.07) but was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for age and sex (OR = 3.39, P = 0.17).

Results for the t-shirt revealed a marginally significant main effect of authorship ( β = 0.457, t = 1.95, p = 0.07), a significant two-way interaction between authorship and loneliness ( β = 0.045, t = 2.46, p < 0.05), and a significant three-way interaction between authorship, loneliness, and product background lighting ( β = −0.066, t = 2.07 , p < 0.05).

For short-delay recall (A6), the main effect was nonsignificant ( F (1, 34) = 0.01, p = .945, η 2 = .000), but a marginally significant interaction emerged ( F (1, 34) = 3.51, p = .070, η 2 = .094), suggesting a potential medium effect and differential group development.

However, the LC + L.r group displayed a higher body weight compared to the LC group, although this difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.07, Fig. 5 C).

The pallidum–vermis IV&V connectivity also showed a negative correlation with amotivation ( Spearman’s ρ = −0.34, P = .013), which failed to survive FDR correction, and became marginally significant after adjusting for illness duration and medication dosage ( Spearman’s ρ = −0.29, P = .07; see Figure 4B ).

After permutation, bipolar I was correlated with a higher prevalence of psychosis at a marginally significant level (estimate = 0.32, SE = 0.07, p = 0.07), see Tables 3 and 4 , Figures S7–S14 for details.

For Hypothesis 2a, ST showed a positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in Wave 1 ( β = 0.385, p < 0.001), but was marginally significant in Wave 2 ( β = 0.211, p = 0.070).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant moderating effect of age ( F 1, 62 = 3.44, p = 0.07), with older adults (≥60 years) showing a tendency toward larger effects ( g = −0.52, 95% CI, −0.72 to −0.32) compared to younger participants (<60 years; g = −0.23, 95% CI, −0.47 to 0.01).

After controlling for MDA, the direct effect of NLR on consolidation was no longer significant (c′ = 0.350, p = 0.198), while the total effect was marginally significant ( c = 0.476, p = 0.070).