Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Our findings suggest that MDD and PTSD show marginally significant ( β = 0.10, SE = 0.06, p = 0.07) and non-significant ( β = −0.07, SE = 0.14, p = 0.644) associations with migraine, respectively, while TBI, even after accounting for MDD and PTSD (which are genetically correlated, r g = 0.64, SE = 0.03), maintains a strong association ( β = 0.75, SE = 0.12, p < 0.001).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Besides replicating the non-significant effect of movement order already observed in the former ANOVA, this analysis indicated a significant main effect of target distance (F (1,28) = 7.03, p = 0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.5) and a marginally significant distance by eccentricity interaction (F (1,28) = 3.4, p = 0.07; LSD post-hoc comparisons: FP < NP, FC and NC, all p < 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Veterans decreased in perceived structure from the military to their first civilian job ( p = 0.03) whereas civilian students non-significantly increased in their perceived structure from their education to their first post-graduation job ( p = 0.29), resulting in a marginally significant veteran status by context interaction, F (1, 178) = 3.27, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01 (see Study 1 Supplemental Analysis in supplemental materials for full results).
marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Here we found a marginally significant difference ( F (1, 22) = 3.61, p = .07, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\hat{\eta}}_{<p>}^2 $$\end{document} η ^ < p > 2 = 0.14), suggesting that (contrary to our prior suggestion) when recognition failures occurred, observers in the active condition spent longer looking at the targets than observers in the passive condition (see Fig. 6 ).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Further analysis showed that no significant difference in linear trend was found for the group that received sumatriptan first, but in the group that received placebo first, a marginally significant linear trend effect was noted (t = 2.039, two-sided p = 0.07, one-sided p = 0.04) (See table 3 ) Discussion Our results show that overall sumatriptan has no significant ability to provoke alcohol lsymptoms or to cause a desire or craving for alcohol.
marginally significantP <0.071.4× alphagold
Consistent with these findings dsAaMC1-injected mosquitoes had a significantly higher median number of oocysts when infected with Plasmodium gallinaceum ( P <0.007, Mann-Whitney Test)( Figure S2 ); the difference in the oocyst distributions was marginally significant ( P <0.07, KS Test) and the prevalence of infection increased significantly from 63% to 80% ( P <0.008, Chi-square Test).