Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
The interaction of sender x message (control) × autonomy was marginally significant ( b = 0.38, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.79], t = 1.792, p = 0.07), suggesting that the group of participants receiving the authoritarian message from the high-authority figure showing a correlation of r = 0.08 (see Table 2 ) deviated slightly from the other treatment groups showing negative correlations between −0.12 and −0.30.
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
PSG results showed that the proportion of deep sleep stage (N3) in the Tai Chi group increased by 23.1%, delta wave power (0.5-4Hz) was significantly enhanced ( P < 0.01), and sleep spindle density (N2 stage) increased by 6.0% ( P = 0.07, marginally significant), while no significant changes were observed in sleep indicators of the control group.
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Finally, Rank2AfterIncongruent fixations were less positive than Rank3AfterIncongruent fixations [1.16 μV; p < 0.05; main effect of Fixation: F (2, 28) = 3.39; p = 0.05], specifically in the ROI 3, ROI 4 and ROI 6 Fixation by ROI interaction marginally significant [ F (10, 140) = 2.25; p = 0.07], while no significant difference was observed with JustAfterIncongruent fixations.
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Participants’ Evaluation An ANOVA on the participants’ evaluation revealed a significant main effect of PDB (M high PDB = 4.26, M low PDB = 4.84; F(1,92) = 7.706, p = 0.007) and marginally significant main effect of the purchase type (M material purchase = 4.35, M experiential purchase = 4.74; F(1,92) = 3.407, p = 0.07).
marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Here we found a marginally significant difference ( F (1, 22) = 3.61, p = .07, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\hat{\eta}}_{<p>}^2 $$\end{document} η ^ < p > 2 = 0.14), suggesting that (contrary to our prior suggestion) when recognition failures occurred, observers in the active condition spent longer looking at the targets than observers in the passive condition (see Fig. 6 ).