“marginally significant”

This effect was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between sex and status ( P < .07): higher scores of patients with CAH than controls were specific to females.

This analysis indeed revealed a marginally significant mediation effect for the fluency effect in the Error rates ( z = 1.9; p < .07), but not for the effect in RTs ( z = −1.4; p = .17).

There was a marginally significant increase in relative humidity ( F = 3.3, P = 0.07) and reduction in air temperature ( F = 3.1, P = 0.08) under the array panels in the spring (2016), but no significant site interaction or site‐by‐panel interaction was detected.

The study found marginally significant differences between Sad and Neutral faces (p = .070) ( Table 3 ).

Gillnet densities were numerically highest in West Africa (2.78 boat-meters/km 2 ) followed by the West Indian Ocean region (1.90 boat-meters/km 2 ) ( Table 1 ), although this is based on marginally significant differences (F (5, 21) = 2.38, p = 0.07).

Four studies included only transplant patients 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 ; subgroup analysis produced similar, marginally significant results (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.02, P = 0.07).

The main effect of time for reduction in glucose AUC was marginally significant from pre to post 10 kg of weight loss ( P = 0.07).

Interestingly, a mixed-design ANOVA on the JNDs revealed a marginally significant interaction between group and standard weight, F (2,52) = 3.19, p<0.07, η 2 p =.09.

There was also a marginally significant trend of the intervention without normative feedback on responsible drinking at the 3-month follow-up (n =575, beta = .40, P = .07) implying a small increase in moderate drinking at the 3-month follow-up.

Stanford students liked Stanford red more than Berkeley students did [ F (1, 101) = 8.92, p < .01, η 2 = .08], and there was a marginally significant trend for Berkeley students to like Berkeley gold more than Stanford students did [ F (1, 101) = 2.30, p = .07, η 2 = .02].

When multiple comparisons were accounted for, only the CYP17A1 rs17724534 variant remained marginally significant (OR per copy of the risk allele (A) = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.08-1.78, corrected p-value = 0.07).

Infants in the 2 groups were comparable on demographic parameters, except for a marginally significant difference in the need for resuscitation between infants born to advanced age mothers and the comparison group (7.2% vs 3.6%, P = .07).

In fact, the difference with the southern Neotropics was not significant (Scheffé contrast, p = 0.73) but the difference with North America was marginally significant (p = 0.07).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant main effect of group on RT [ F RT (1,53) 3.33, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.54].

Faces showed a similar pattern with own face eliciting a more negative N250 than other face ( p < 0.001), a marginally significant difference between own and target faces ( p < 0.07), and a significant difference between target and other faces ( p < 0.01) in the first half.

Among older children, a marginally significant association between SV on mobile devices of up to 1 h (β = − 0.62 h, 95%CI: -1.11, − 0.13, overall P = 0.07) per day and sleep duration was observed when compared with no SV.

Planned comparisons using TI as a reference class showed no significant difference for MCS (B = 1.13, SE = 2.91, t = 0.39, p = .70) and marginally significant differences for LI (B = −5.29, SE = 2.93, t = −1.81, p = .07) and PVS (B = 5.43, SE = 2.92, t = 1.86, p = .06, with judgments of appropriateness being lower an higher, respectively, as compared to TI.

Correlations between the three speech measures and tinnitus awareness and tinnitus impact were not significant at the alpha < 0.05 level (two-tailed distribution), although a marginally significant positive correlation was seen between BKB sentence testing in quiet scores and tinnitus awareness ( r = 0.185, p = 0.07).

A semantic blocking effect was obtained, with slower naming latencies in the semantically related condition than in the unrelated condition [580 and 570 ms, respectively; marginally significant by subjects, t 1(11) = 1.98; p = 0.07; t 2(53) = 2.25; p < 0.05].

Next, when the clinical features of the 84 ESCC cases were stratified by the pathohistological response of the primary lesion to NAC, the distribution of pathological T stage was significantly different between responders and non-responders ( P < 0.0001) whereas the distribution of pathological stage and pretreatment serum CEA value were marginally significant ( P = 0.07, Table 2 ).

The increase in step length for the normal leg was marginally significant ( p = 0.070).

As for beta1 parietal asymmetry, its relation with BDI scores was marginally significant ( r = 0.23, p = 0.07) when all participants were pooled together.

The overall warming effects were marginally significant on LFC ( p = 0.07, Table 1 ) but insignificant on LFN ( p = 0.16, Table 1 ).

The Lighting × Activation ANOVA on Mental Effort showed no effects involving the lighting factor ( Fs < 1); only the main effect of activation was marginally significant, F (1,23) = 3.59, p = 0.07 (mental effort tended to be perceived as higher in high vs. low arousal conditions).

For the commission error (CE), there was a marginally significant valence effect (F(2,114) = 2.717, p = 0.070).