Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Besides replicating the non-significant effect of movement order already observed in the former ANOVA, this analysis indicated a significant main effect of target distance (F (1,28) = 7.03, p = 0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.5) and a marginally significant distance by eccentricity interaction (F (1,28) = 3.4, p = 0.07; LSD post-hoc comparisons: FP < NP, FC and NC, all p < 0.05).
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
Coexpressed genes showed marginally significant evidence ( P = 0.07) of coevolution of the lengths of intergenic regions, but the extent of coevolution for intergenic lengths was significantly less than for intron lengths (e.g., partial Pearson correlation coefficients of genes belonging to the same GTEx coexpression clusters were significantly higher in the case of introns than intergenic regions; P = 7.4 × 10 − 8 ).
Intron Length Coevolution across Mammalian Genomes.
Mol Biol Evol · 2016 · PMC5026260
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
In the sensitivity analyses, the significant associations between the aforementioned lipids and HUA were not altered [RR: 0.79–1.53; all p < 0.05 except for LPC (20:2), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.07)], after excluding participants taking lipid-lowering medications and those with declined kidney functions (Table S3 ).
marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Follow‐up ANOVAs revealed significant differences in relative concentrations of three of the four compounds (methylhistidine, citrulline, and d‐glucarate) among the five study species ( F 4,8.93 = 9.63, p < .001; F 4,11.26 = 7.39, p < .001; F 4,12.87 = 18.23, p < .001, respectively) and a marginally significant difference in relative concentration of creatinol o‐phosphate among the study species (F 4,8.98 = 2.46, p = .07; Figure 5 ). 4 DISCUSSION In this study, we investigated the differences in diaspore morphology, elaiosome fatty acids, and elaiosome phytochemisty among five species of Trillium with different levels of attractiveness to seed‐dispersing ants in the southern Appalachian region of North America.
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
This effect may be driven more by suppression than facilitation: the facilitative effect of hearing a paired sound was not significantly different from a chance rate of 0.5 ( Figure 3a , left bar): two-tailed t test, t (19) = 1.03, p = 0.32, whereas the suppressive effect of hearing any other sound was marginally significant ( Figure 3a , right bar): t (19) = −1.91, p = 0.07.