The regression analysis showed a significant main effect for spatial ability [β = −0.507, se(HC4) = 0.181, p = 0.007], no main effect of condition [β = 0.703, se(HC4) = 0.399, p = 0.10], and a marginally significant interaction effect between spatial ability and condition [β = 0.224, se(HC4) = 0.123, p = 0.07].
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Additionally, the pathway from Week 4 SPA to Week 8 PA was marginally significant (β = .11, p = .07).
Social anxiety reached a marginally significant main effect, F (1, 92) = 3.33, p = 0.07, ∂η 2 = 0.04, while degree of depressive symptoms did not, F (1, 92) < 0.10, p = 0.76.
There was a marginally significant difference in initial sputum culture positivity between the two groups ( P = 0.07), with DM+ being more likely to present with a positive sputum culture.
Career self-efficacy expectations and academic achievement quadratic trends also demonstrated a negative and statistically marginally significant association, r = −0.09, p = 0.07.
In terms of the d-FRN's statistical analysis from the other-chosen stocks, a 2 (stock owner: self, other) × 10 (electrode: F3, F4, FC1, FC2, Fz, Cz, C3, C4, CP1, and CP2) ANOVA produced a marginally significant main effect of ownership, F (1, 21) = 3.65, p = 0.07, η 2 partial = 0.148.
We observed a marginally significant effect indicating that Utilitarian claims are negatively related to participants subjective taste ratings (coefficient: −0.7428, P = 0.07, obtained from linear regression using clustered standard errors at the session level).
In contrast, the congruity–valence interaction was marginally significant in the H-EC condition, F (1, 80) = 3.28, p = 0.07, partial η 2 = 0.04.
The IRRs were also significantly high with either aeroallergens positive or RV infection (2.54, p = 0.05), and marginally significant with both (3.44, p = 0.07).
During periods 3–5, when the children in the LNS groups received the supplement directly, food-insecurity scores were significantly lower in the LNS group when the children were 11–12.9 mo old (PSR: 0.96, P = 0.03) and marginally significant when they were 16–18.9 mo old ( P = 0.07) and ≥23 mo old ( P = 0.08).
The results indicated that NP [unstandardized β=11.47, 95% CI (4.95,17.99), P <0.01], non-anemia [unstandardized β=10.68, 95% CI (4.16,17.19), P <0.01], incomplete injury [unstandardized β=24.82, 95% CI (17.99,31.64), P <0.01], and lumbar-sacral injury level [unstandardized β=16.02, 95% CI (6.90,25.13), P <0.01] were independent predictors of SCIM total score at discharge, while the thoracic injury level was marginally significant [unstandardized β=7.05, 95% CI (−0.54, 14.64), P =0.07] ( Table 2 ).
A nonmonotonic trend could be observed; however, the differences between the first local maximum to the local minimum, and the local minimum to the next local maximum were marginally significant ( r s c ̄ 0.5 mm = 0.0266 ± 0.0032 vs. r s c ̄ 2.5 mm = 0.0165 ± 0.0021, P = 0.07; and r s c ̄ 2.5 mm = 0.0165 ± 0.0021 vs. r s c ̄ 4 mm = 0.0266 ± 0.0054, P = 0.1; green curve in Fig. 6 B ).
A marginally significant main effect of button function was found [ F (1,80) = 3.38, p = 0.070, η p 2 = 0.04], together with a significant interaction effect of age group and button function [ F (2,80) = 3.51, p = 0.035, η p 2 = 0.08].
Although, there were no statistically significant interactions between psychological measures and sex or BMI on CRP, there was a marginally significant interaction for the categorical variable of Class II or greater obesity and anxiety on CRP ( p =0.07).
Better performance in the PS domain was related to higher FA in FMAJ and IFOF and lower MD in CHC, CS, FMAJ, and IFOF (marginally significant, p = 0.07).
The differences in women's education in different cities were marginally significant based on one-way non-parametric ANOVA (p=0.07) (Table 6 ).
Contact with cows with diarrhoea was marginally significant ( p = 0.07) and class remained in the model as a confounder.
There appeared to be a trend of decreasing hazards with a greater propensity to receive chemotherapy near death, ranging from 1.32 to 0.85, and the interaction between receipt of an aggressive approach to chemotherapy and propensity quintiles was marginally significant (P = 0.07). 3) Results from instrumental variable analysis We report selected baseline characteristics of patients according to geographic quintiles of chemotherapy utilization in Table 5 .
Adding eosinophil percentage to the model reduced the magnitude of the interaction coefficient, and the interaction term became marginally significant, b = -0.010, SE = 0.005, 95% CI [-0.020, 0.001], p = .07; however, the coefficient for eosinophil percentage itself was nearly zero, b = -0.0001, p = .98.
Assessment of Opportunity Costs and Placebo Effects The counseling group increased the number of performed cognitive, physical, and social leisure activity types (excluding JP solving) by 1.4, which is a marginally significant increase relative to the JP group ( p = 0.07).
In none of these cases did we find a significant relationship between the number of WGCW hotspots and mutation frequency ( S2 Table ) with the possible exception of RA, where we observe a marginally significant positive correlation (r = 0.42, P = 0.07, S1 Fig ).
A marginally significant main effect of intentionality, F (1, 62) = 3.37, p = .07, reflected longer response times to foreseen harm scenarios ( M = 6836 milliseconds, SD = 2246) than intentional harm scenarios ( M = 6540 milliseconds, SD = 2612).
At TL2 we found marginally significant reduced power in the alpha band for LATE versus EARLY questions between about 600 to 900 ms after the onset of the last word (p = .07).
There was a marginally significant group effect [ F (1, 19) = 3.7, p = 0.07], indicating that AMSA had higher EI values than ICH-CI patients.
The difference in prevalence of distant metastases between FTC and HCC patients was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).