“marginally significant”

A positive association of totT with CBF was observed (r = 0.167, P = 0.023), which was marginally significant after restricting analysis to HT non-users (r = 0.161, P = 0.066).

4C ), whereas SNV neoantigen load difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.066, Fig. 4C ).

The results also showed a trend of increased neutrophils in the microenvironment, although this trend along the stage progress were marginally significant (trend test, P = 0.066; Fig. 7c ).

On the other hand, a positive correlation was found between NfL and age at treatment ( r = 0.59, P = .046) along with a marginally significant correlation between NfL and duration of the disease ( r = 0.55, P = .066) (Figure 2 E and 2 ).

Partial correlation analysis showed that only the positive correlation between HAMD scores and the FC of the posterior parietal thalamus with the bilateral precuneus/post cingulate cortex in MDD was marginally significant ( r = 0.43, p = 0.066), and it was markedly different from the corresponding correlation in HCs (HCs: r = −0.232, p = 0.298; Fisher z = 2.136, p = 0.034).

Regression results indicated that fall 2016 hybrid students had lower (marginally significant) average undergraduate GPAs than spring and fall 2015 hybrid students ( F [2, 244] = 2.75, p = 0.066).

A supplementary sensitivity analysis decomposing ARSME into behavioral engagement and psychological investment components revealed that psychological investment showed a marginally significant prospective effect on body dissatisfaction ( β = 0.08, p = 0.066), while behavioral screen time did not, providing preliminary support for cognitive-processing-focused interventions.

However, it seems that, based on the output from the multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis, there was a marginally significant association between the failed medication and metabolic breakdown when comparing MB3 to MB1 (p = 0.066).

There was no gender difference between benign and malignant groups, but a marginally significant association was shown between female and PTC (OR = 0.866, CI 0.744–1.009, P = .066).

Regarding FIGO grades, grade 3 tumor was identified as an independent risk factor for LVSI (OR = 3.958, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.250-6.961, P < 0.001), while grade 2 tumor showed marginally significant results (OR = 1.503, 95% CI 0.973-2.322, P = 0.066).

Heart rate variability The MANOVA found a significant effect for Moments (Wilk’s Lambda: 0.108, F 32, 38 = 2.42, p = 0.005, ŋ p 2 = 0.67, OP = 0.99), a marginally significant interaction between Moments and Group (Wilk’s Lambda: 0.173, F 32, 38 = 1.67, p = 0.066, ŋ p 2 = 0.58, OP = 0.92), and a significant interaction between Moments, Group, and VR (Wilk’s Lambda: 0.110, F 32, 38 = 2.40, p = 0.005, ŋ p 2 = 0.67, OP = 0.99).

Below 0.78 mmol/L, Mg exhibited a marginally significant inverse correlation with METS-IR (β = -0.307, p = 0.066), which became non-significant above this level, indicating reduced insulin resistance with rising Mg concentrations in hypomagnesemia, which means that supplementary of Mg for people with hypomagnesemia might alleviate the insulin resistance.

For the gamma band (Figure 2C ), there was a hemisphere × group interaction [ F (1, 28) = 5.30, p = 0.029], with a marginally significant group difference in the left [Controls > Dyslexics, F (1) = 3.66, p = 0.066, effect size: d = 0.71] but not in the right hemisphere [ F (1) = 0.29, p = 0.867].

However, results revealed a marginally significant interaction between implicit partner evaluations and type of behavior, b = 0.18, SE = 0.10, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.38], p = .066, β = 0.07.

Consistent with this, a clear positive relationship was observed between diameter and FFG richness ( R 2 = 0.44, p = 0.003) (Figure 5c ), while a marginally significant relationship was identified between APL and FFG richness ( R 2 = 0.20, p = 0.066) (Figure 5d ). 3.3 Keystone Taxa in Shaping Biodiversity Keystone taxa which had higher centrality (higher degree or higher betweenness) were critical for modules and co‐occurrence networks and played important roles in determining biodiversity.

May found a marginally significant effect, F (1, 272) = 3.42, p = .066, d = .22, such that participants in May who were relatively less worried about the disease produced harsher moral judgments than participants less worried about the disease in March, perhaps as a function of extended exposure to this threat.

Tumor CTLA-4 expression was a marginally significant prognostic factor for FFS ( p = 0.066).

Similarly, the proportion of pathologic type in temporal lobe was driven by IDH-wildtype GBM (30.4%), even though the P value was marginally significant ( P =0.066, by Chi-Square).

However, the relation between education and use of sports facilities became marginally significant (p = 0.066), as did the mediation (p = 0.076).

In addition, E&S condition also showed a higher activation than E&NS (marginally significant, t (15)=2.88, P =0.066, Bonferroni corrected, ES=0.72) and NE&NS ( t (15)=3.32, P =0.025, Bonferroni corrected, ES=0.83) conditions.

The association with overall survival in non‐smoker patients remained marginally significant in multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards regression after adjustment for age, gender, and tumor stage (n = 130, HR = 0.560 [95% CI 0.30‐1.04]; P = .066) (Table S6 ).

1 ) and tended to decrease with increasing exposure level ( P = 0.064): females under high exposure had lower probability to lay than females under low exposure ( P = 0.010) but there was a marginally significant difference between females under high exposure and unexposed females due to higher variation in the unexposed group ( P = 0.066, Table 2 , Fig. 2a ).

While the direct effect of social relations satisfaction on AL was marginally significant ( β = − 0.094, p = .066), neither social relations satisfaction nor dissatisfaction significantly mediated the parental SEP-AL association.

The number of sexually active learners who reported more than one sex partner was higher in boys than in girls, though the association was marginally significant (boys = 50% vs. girls = 31.8%; χ 2 (n = 102) = 3.39, p = 0.066).

The significant increase of fit in the power model when incorporating both body surface area and time-in-house, and the marginally significant increase in the linear model (p-value = 0.066), are consistent with the hypothesis that people accumulate more bites at a location if they spend more time there.