“marginally significant”

The valence by self-investment interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 120) = 3.44, p = .066, η p 2 = .03.

An analysis of variance on interest in pursuing Mathematics and natural sciences showed a marginally significant difference between profiles, F (2, 334) = 2.74, p = 0.066, ƞ p 2 = 0.02.

For females, the result showed a significant main effect of treatment ( B = −0.064, p = 0.010), and a marginally significant social concern × treatment effect ( B = 0.046, p = 0.066); R 2 m = 0.028.

In addition, significant correlations were observed between the score on the Purdue Pegboard task and the early RRN for right-hand stimuli for the left hemisphere, r = 0.646, p < 0.05 and a marginally significant effect for the right hemisphere, r = 0.601, p = 0.066.

The correlation between Shannon’s index with vegetable land was marginally significant in this model ( p = 0.066).

The fixed effects omnibus tests indicated a marginally significant effect for role of session participant ( F = 3.38, p = 0.066) and a significant effect for Order of OD-session ( F = 4.07, p = 0.044), suggesting that these variables were associated with the SRS scores.

The March infection variable loses significance in Column 5 but is still marginally significant ( p ‐value = .066).

Second, when analyzed separately for each group, the correlation was marginally significant for GII ( ρ = 0.346; N = 29; p = 0.066) and not significant for GI ( ρ = −0.042; N = 14; p = 0.892).

When we omitted the NR subjects from our analyses, we still observed an effect of monetary reward [ F (2, 58) = 16.530, p < 0.001], and a marginally significant effect of liquid feedback [ F (1, 29) = 3.658, p = 0.066].

However, it seems that, based on the output from the multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis, there was a marginally significant association between the failed medication and metabolic breakdown when comparing MB3 to MB1 (p = 0.066).

The moderation effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.066), indicating partial support for H4.

Healthy controls showed a greater alpha diversity based on observed OTUs (* p = 0.05) and marginally significant Chao1 indices ( p = 0.066) ( Figure 2 ).

The effect of L1 proficiency was marginally significant (F = 3.70,df = 25.18, p = 0.066).

Statistical results We found no significant difference in mean parasite richness between sloth species (ANOVA: F 1,34 = 1.3, P = 0.263) or habitat types ( F 1,34 = 0.4, P = 0.544), but there was a marginally significant sloth species × habitat type interaction ( F 1,34 = 3.6, P = 0.066).

Partial correlation analysis showed that only the positive correlation between HAMD scores and the FC of the posterior parietal thalamus with the bilateral precuneus/post cingulate cortex in MDD was marginally significant ( r = 0.43, p = 0.066), and it was markedly different from the corresponding correlation in HCs (HCs: r = −0.232, p = 0.298; Fisher z = 2.136, p = 0.034).

Marginally significant associations were detected for loneliness and adult socioeconomic status (p = 0.066, p = 0.093, respectively).

4 I,K), at least C_15 experienced a lower reduction in inflorescence weight but not number compared to its WT counterpart, and there was a marginally significant genotype by treatment interaction ( p = 0.0660) for the former (Fig. 4 C; Additional file 2 and 1 Fig.

Consistent with this, a clear positive relationship was observed between diameter and FFG richness ( R 2 = 0.44, p = 0.003) (Figure 5c ), while a marginally significant relationship was identified between APL and FFG richness ( R 2 = 0.20, p = 0.066) (Figure 5d ). 3.3 Keystone Taxa in Shaping Biodiversity Keystone taxa which had higher centrality (higher degree or higher betweenness) were critical for modules and co‐occurrence networks and played important roles in determining biodiversity.

Medical professionals are less likely to have poor knowledge compared to non-medical professionals, with a marginally significant odds ratio of 0.707 (p = 0.066) (Table 4 ).

Although survival analysis indicated no significant difference between the FOLFOX group and the 5‐FU and cisplatin group, the FOLFOX regimen was associated with a marginally significant reduction of treatment‐related death compared with the 5‐FU and cisplatin regimen (1 vs. 6; p = .066).

In the 6-year-old group, the difference in helping behavior between the time delay condition ( M = 0.81, SD = 0.32) and the time pressure condition ( M = 0.58, SD = 0.43) was marginally significant, p = 0.066.

Study design showed a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.066).

There was additionally a marginally significant fixed effect of CPRS conflict, F (1, 39) = 3.585, p = 0.066, showing a positive association between arousal and CPRS conflict.

There was no significant difference between HIV-1 positive and HIV-1 negative women in MMP9 (p = 0.91), but marginally significant in MMP2 (p = 0.066) and Gal-13 (p = 0.060).

However, the rs3134940 genotypes and alleles frequency showed a marginally significant difference between the COPD-BBS group and BBES (p = 0.066 and 0.075, respectively).