“marginally significant”

When we omitted the NR subjects from our analyses, we still observed an effect of monetary reward [ F (2, 58) = 16.530, p < 0.001], and a marginally significant effect of liquid feedback [ F (1, 29) = 3.658, p = 0.066].

Percent motility was marginally significant at p = 0.066 ( Figure 1 C).

In addition, E&S condition also showed a higher activation than E&NS (marginally significant, t (15)=2.88, P =0.066, Bonferroni corrected, ES=0.72) and NE&NS ( t (15)=3.32, P =0.025, Bonferroni corrected, ES=0.83) conditions.

In bare patches, we detected a marginally significant effect of herbivore removal on ABG cover after 17 years (Treatment contrast in bare patches for 2016: F 1,20 = 3.79, p = .066).

The interaction of Congruency × Previous Congruency was marginally significant in the complete sample F (1, 19) = 3.801, p = 0.066, ηp 2 = 0.167 and reached significance in the analysis excluding data of Participant 11 F (1, 18) = 4.609, p = 0.046, ηp 2 = 0.204.

Separately, none of the models using green and blue space availability ( Supplementary Material Table S3 ) showed statistically relevant direct or indirect effects on the outcomes, with the sole exception of a marginally significant increase of 36 g ( p = 0.066) in BW in children delivered by mothers with green-space availability in 300 m in the model using NO 2 concentrations as mediator ( Supplementary Material Table S4 ).

A further rmANOVA, in which the percentiles P 1 , P 3 , and P 5 were compared, revealed a significant main effect of the factor time point ( F (1.61, 51.76) = 58.0, p < .001, η p 2 = .64), a marginally significant main effect of the factor percentile ( F (2, 64) = 2.84, p = .066, η p 2 = .08), and a significant interaction time point * percentile ( F (4, 128) = 13.19, p < .001, η p 2 = .29).

A supplementary sensitivity analysis decomposing ARSME into behavioral engagement and psychological investment components revealed that psychological investment showed a marginally significant prospective effect on body dissatisfaction ( β = 0.08, p = 0.066), while behavioral screen time did not, providing preliminary support for cognitive-processing-focused interventions.

6f ; Methods section), which was marginally significant in a multivariate Cox analysis including LN-status ( p = 0.066, Cox proportional hazards test).

After adjusting for all available confounders, the relationship between age at menarche and the risk of myopia in the right eye became marginally significant ( p = 0.066), while the association remained significant in the left eye ( p = 0.001).

The linear mixed-effects models showed that, compared with the control group, the intervention was associated with a significantly decreased Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (β = −0.67, p = 0.012), and a marginally significant effect on reducing roommates’ influence on sleep schedule (β = −0.21, p = 0.066).

In the post-verb region, there was a marginally significant interaction of verb and structure type ( p = 0.066), but no significant effect was observed in other eye-movement measures.

Gender-based analysis of normalized brain volumes revealed ( Table 2 ) a significant difference between male and female participants in total frontal volume ( p = 0.012) and a marginally significant difference in total parietal volume ( p = 0.066).

The group × stimulation interaction term was marginally significant, F (2, 54) = 2.85, p = 0.066, ηp 2 = 0.096.

Meanwhile, a marginally significant increase between pre- and post-tool use in the condition of searching with a cane ( p = 0.066) was found.

These main effects were qualified by a marginally significant comprehensibility × belief consistency interaction, F (1, 42) = 3.56, p = 0.066, ηp2 = 0.078, OP = 0.45 (see Figure 1 ).

Additionally, the corresponding OR for the high-level group (>10 mg/g cre.) is 3.05, a marginally significant result ( p = 0.066). 4.

For LF power, we also found a significant phase (challenge-baseline) × age group interaction ( p = .012; Table 2 ) and a marginally significant phase (recovery-challenge) × age group interaction effect ( p = .066; Table 2 ); pairwise comparisons indicated significant baseline-to-challenge decreases and challenge-to-recovery increases in LF power for younger but not older participants ( Supplementary Results , Section 1 ).

Backward masking reduced target visibility [ F (1,14) = 92.73], and close proximity was marginally significant in reducing target visibility [ F (1,14) = 3.96, p = 0.066].

The significant increase of fit in the power model when incorporating both body surface area and time-in-house, and the marginally significant increase in the linear model (p-value = 0.066), are consistent with the hypothesis that people accumulate more bites at a location if they spend more time there.

Regarding FIGO grades, grade 3 tumor was identified as an independent risk factor for LVSI (OR = 3.958, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.250-6.961, P < 0.001), while grade 2 tumor showed marginally significant results (OR = 1.503, 95% CI 0.973-2.322, P = 0.066).

Partial correlation analysis showed that only the positive correlation between HAMD scores and the FC of the posterior parietal thalamus with the bilateral precuneus/post cingulate cortex in MDD was marginally significant ( r = 0.43, p = 0.066), and it was markedly different from the corresponding correlation in HCs (HCs: r = −0.232, p = 0.298; Fisher z = 2.136, p = 0.034).

Although the difference was statistically marginally significant (p=0.066), the stride length in the faller group tended to be shorter than that in the non-faller group.

The multivariable meta-regression was marginally significant (χ2 = 29.01, p = 0.066), but substantial residual heterogeneity persisted (I 2 = 98.6%).

However, results revealed a marginally significant interaction between implicit partner evaluations and type of behavior, b = 0.18, SE = 0.10, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.38], p = .066, β = 0.07.