“marginally significant”

Those with borderline personality disorder had a marginally significant increase in suicidal events in the first 5 years ( p = 0.064), increasing to a significant increase at 12 years ( p = 0.003) but not at 30 years.

Similarly, there was a significant correlation between the incidence of recurrence and increased EGFR RNA (p = 0.003) and a marginally significant correlation with EGFR protein overexpression ( p = 0.064) as well as between metastasis and p53 overexpression ( p < 0.0001), p53 mutation ( p = 0.04) and altered Rb expression ( p = 0.026).

In the BD group, we found only a marginally significant reduction on ellipse area (small area indicates better postural stability) with closed-eyes condition ( p = 0.064) at week eight.

For the percentage of risky choices following losses, we found a marginally significant effect of DAT1 genotype [ F (1, 58) = 3.56, p = .064, η 2 = .06], showing a tendency for more risk taking in 9R-carriers of DAT1, but no effect for the 5HTTLPR ( F < 1) or COMT val158met ( F < 1) genotype.

The difference between the cross-lagged path coefficients was marginally significant, Δχ 2 (1) = 3.42, p = 0.064, with a stronger association leading from WM-t1 to ToM-t2 than in the opposite direction.

In a model adjusted for age, sex, type of surgery, and preoperative horizontal angle of deviation, simultaneous vertical rectus muscle recession showed a marginally significant association with surgical dose-response (β = -0.389, P = 0.064).

They also exhibited a marginally significant ( p = .064) convergence effect in the quality scale.

Wheat usually had higher δ 13 C values than barley, although this difference was marginally significant (Student’s t -test: t(86) = 1.872, p = 0.064) only for La Bastida.

Interaction between the group and the learning mode was marginally significant [ F (2,92) = 2.831, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.058].

Although marginally significant, SRC-1 expression levels had 1.3 times higher expression levels in the group with non-organ confined cancer ( p = 0.064).

However, the redivision from 3 to 2 groups (H-IGF1 deco versus combined I-IGF1 deco and L-IGF1 deco ) demonstrated a marginally significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between the two groups ( p = 0.064; Supplementary Figure S5 ). 3.5.

The dN/dS ratio had a marginally significant correlation with upper elevation limit (r = 0.550, p = 0.064; Additional file Figure S1 ).

While there was no significant three-way interaction, all two-way interactions were significant or marginally significant [F(1, 23) ≥ 3.77, p ≤ .064].

Pairwise comparisons showed a marginally significant difference in total fluid administration across all groups (p=0.064), and a statistically significant difference between the CFT and GDFT/ED groups (p=0.003).

We also observed a marginally significant decrease of 5.3% ( p <0.064) for in-person primary care visits among the overall treatment population.

A marginally significant difference between groups was observed for 5-year OS ( P =0.064; Figure 5b ).

We also compared the task difficulty assessed by members using repeated measures ANOVA analysis, and the result showed that the difference between roles was marginally significant (F (2, 29) = 2.89, p = 0.064, η 2 partial = 0.09).

Only a marginally significant correlation was found between PDGFRA mRNA and lymph node metastasis ( p = 0.064). 2.2.

For salivary cortisol, we found a marginally significant main effect of time (F(3, 171) = 2.46, p = 0.064, two-sided).

This relationship was statistically significant for fungicide application ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for insecticide application ( p = 0.064).

After adjusting for sample size, we found that the eight most heavily parasitized species, or those with the highest relative tick abundance, accounted for over half (51.6%) of all ticks we collected ( Figure 3 ). Linear models revealed a significant effect of mass (F = 20.28, P < 0.0001, df = 1) and nesting site (F = 7.80, P = 0.0003, DF = 3) and a marginally significant effect of foraging category (ground versus tree, F = 3.61, P = 0.064, DF = 1) on tick prevalence ( Figure 4 ).

The three‐way interaction between CI/NH, left/right and auditory/visual was marginally significant ( F (1,26) = 3.75, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.003).

Political identity had a marginally significant negative association with social prediction ( b = -0.09, SE = 0.05, t (258) = 1.86, p = .064).

Due to a marginally significant group by correctness interaction in the omnibus ANOVA, F (1, 36) = 3.65, p = 0.064, another follow-up analysis was conducted separately for natives and learners.

The two-way interaction between Overlap and Prime Type was marginally significant ( t = 1.91, p = 0.064).