“marginally significant”

These trends were marginally significant (Fischer’s exact test, p = 0.062; Figure 3 ).

The ratio of preserved axons was 0.88 ± 0.16 and 0.68 ± 0.17 in the 2-week 1.0 mg/kg etanercept-treated group and PBS-treated group, respectively, with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.062) (Table 1 ).

The effect for Black was marginally significant, β = 0.140, p = 0.062.

Notably, ‘routine treatment’ (23 trials) and ‘comfort group settings’ (27 trials) showed marginally significant trends (interaction p=0.062 and 0.076, respectively), suggesting these factors might contribute to between-study heterogeneity.

The path from Factor 3 to Factor 1 was marginally significant at the 0.1 level ( β = 0.126, standardized β = 0.160, p = 0.062).

Moreover, if tGSH and uric acid levels were not included in the TAC model as covariates, the interaction between morph and sex remained marginally significant (interaction: F 1,30 = 3.75, P = 0.062; morph: F 1,43 = 0.50, P = 0.484; sex: F 1,32.1 = 1.27, P = 0.268; Fig. 2B ).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between group and accent ( β = −0.51, SE = 0.27, z = −1.87, p = 0.062).

Healthy Controls and ELPH The repeated measures analysis demonstrated a significant main effect for time (F (19, 418) = 3.36, p<.001, η 2 = .13), with a marginally significant difference between players (F (1, 22) = 3.86, p = .062, η 2 = .15) for ELPH compared to HCs.

Average values for vimentin mRNA after LPS treatment were higher in both VAD and VAA groups, consistent with the protein staining results shown in Figure 5 g, although this was marginally significant ( P = 0.062) only in the VAA group.

In 2017, it similarly led to a marginally significant increase in cellulose paper mass loss (β = 23.194, P = .062 by LMM; Fig. 3A ).

Although, preoperative A and D indicated each positive and negative correlation coefficient with postoperative improvement of general health status, they were only statistically marginally significant ( p =0.062, 0.063).

The difference between groups at the old airport location before the move was marginally significant p = 0.062 [ 23 ], but not any more after the move.

Gender was associated with THILS scores (B = 0.18, p = .048), and prior chatbot use showed a marginally significant positive association (B = 0.21, p = .062).

The skin & blood clock provides marginally significant evidence (p=0.062) that fibroblasts from boys with classic HGPS are epigenetically older than those from girls with classic HGPS, but this gender effect is not apparent when classic and non-classic HGPS samples are pooled for analyses ( Supplementary Figure 10 ).

The centered interaction term using training regimen and session was added to the regression model and accounted for a marginally significant amount of variance in the correlation between fluid intelligence and training gain, ΔR 2 = .101, ΔF (1, 26) = 3.80, b = -.034, t (26) = -1.950, p = .062 (see Fig 5 ).

F4 disorders increased from 9.8% in Phase 1 to 21.6% in Phase 2, with a marginally significant P value (P = 0.062; Figure S4 ).

A marginally significant increase over time was found for the subscale “positive affect” in this group (Z = −1.87, p = 0.062).

Post-hoc pairwise comparisons did not reveal any significant differences between the five sonification types, but two comparisons were noted as being marginally significant: the pulsed sine tone sonication was rated marginally higher (i.e. more useful) than the frequency sonification ( p = 0.062), and the SNR sonification was rated marginally higher than the frequency sonification ( p = 0.062).

In addition, the interaction effect between age and risk was marginally significant, F (12, 1458) = 1.70, p = .062, η2 p = .01.

Meanwhile, the difference between nR0 and nR(un) was significant in pT1 (RFS, 5‐year rate: 92.0% versus 74.1%, p < 0.001; OS, 5‐year rate: 92.6% versus 77.7%, p < 0.001) and marginally significant in pT2 disease (RFS, 5‐year rate: 70.5% versus 59.4%, p = 0.062; OS, 5‐year rate: 72.0% versus 62.3%, p = 0.077) (supplementary material, Figure S1E,F ).

There was also a marginally significant effect of SNR, F (1.752,70.060) = 3.010, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.070.

Finally, three out of four scales were significant predictors of the satisfaction with time use item, with the remaining self-congruence scale a marginally significant predictor ( p = 0.062).

More respondents with high scores of perceived danger of COVID-19 (≥8) had favorable changes in having avoided smoking on the street (p=0.031) and reduced going out to buy cigarettes (p=0.014), and marginally significant differences in having avoided smoking with other smokers (p=0.062).

As shown in Figure 4D , only a marginally significant inverse correlation was detected between cell donor age and TMPRSS2 expression, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of−0.58 ( p = 0.0622).

The Tukey least-squares-means test showed that participants accepted offers made when the computer displayed GL more than when it displayed RH ( p = 0.0623, marginally significant) or no light animation ( p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between when the computer displayed RH and no light animation.