“marginally significant”

The CRF at V1 was marginally significant, with a negative parameter estimate of −0.098303 ( p = 0.0623).

The Tukey least-squares-means test showed that participants accepted offers made when the computer displayed GL more than when it displayed RH ( p = 0.0623, marginally significant) or no light animation ( p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between when the computer displayed RH and no light animation.

The tenth tree was marginally significant ( P = 0.0625).

In the MSB group, the sleep score in ESAS decreased an average 2.4 points from baseline to day 7, which indicated a marginally significant improvement in sleep ( P = .0625), with an effect size of 0.97.

The covariate emotional attachment to the in-group was marginally significant ( b = 0.1971, SE = 0.1047, t = 1.8825, p = 0.0627, 95% CIs = -0.0107, 0.4050).

A marginally significant main effect of the condition ( F (2,37.1)=2.983, p=0.0628) on the response change in the stimulation session relative to the baseline session (i.e., stimulation effect) was observed, indicating that these changes may depend on the stimulation condition.

The one-way ANOVA showed marginally significant differences among the expression groups (F = 5.1907, p = 0.0629).

Begg’s test was marginally significant (Kendall’s tau = -0.4242, p = 0.0629).

In relation to sociodemographic characteristics, only a marginally significant difference in MHL levels based on sex was found, with female participants scoring higher on the MHLq-SVa instrument (Mdn = 69 vs. 71; p = 0.063) than male participants ( Table S1 ).

Results showed that decomposability of DOC was significantly related to R h across the forests in the warm season ( P = 0.003), and marginally significant in the cool season ( P = 0.063, Fig. 5 ).

We found no significant differences in the number of calls given to vivid or anaesthetized intruders (LMM: F 1,66 = 0.83, p = 0.366), and marginally significant differences in the latency to start calling (LMM: F 1,25 = 3.8, p = 0.063).

There were marginally significant effects of years of education ( t = 1.86; p = 0.063) and marital status at Year 1 ( t = 1.85; p = 0.066) in the direction of greater positive change associated with more years of education, and married vs. single status at Year 1.

When major COVID-19 impacts were added to the model (Model 2), the overall effects of social support and engagement were largely unchanged, except for those with high instrumental support, which became marginally significant ( p = 0.063).

Period and microhabitat had non significant effects on the GLMM ( p > 0.4), but the interaction term was marginally significant ( p = 0.063; Table 2 ). 3.4 Seed dispersal effectiveness Seed dispersal effectiveness provided by different bird groups (residents, and sub‐Saharan and European migrants) changed remarkably in time due to temporal changes in the quantity and quality components (Figure 4 a).

Weight loss was significantly associated with poor DMFS ( P = 0.006) as well as OS ( P < 0.001), and had a marginally significant influence on PFS ( P = 0.063).

Results: Probiotic supplementation significantly influenced acetate titer (p=0,032) marginally significant for propionate and butyrate (p=0.063 and p=0.068, respectively) and the respondent with increasing SCFA’s metabolite are higher in probiotic group compared to the respondents in placebo group.

For statistics anxiety, only a marginally significant association is found: statistics anxiety is negatively related to performance (β = −0.303, p = 0.063).

There was a marginally significant main effect for prior research experience ( F (1, 63) = 3.583, p = 0.063), a nonsignificant main effect for year in school ( F (1, 63) = 0.525, p = 0.594), and no significant interaction between the effects of research experience and year in school ( F (2, 63) = 0.229, p = 0.796).

Local information contained in left middle frontal gyrus was marginally significant for discrimination ( Z = 1.53, P = 0.063).

The effects of cellulose and water contents of 5–10 cm soil layer (W2) were marginally significant (p = 0.063 and = 0.059, respectively) with positive coefficients.

Another SNP in CHRNA3 , rs938682T/C, showed a marginally significant association for variant genotypes (TC/CC) compared with the wild-type genotype (TT), with an OR = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.45–1.02; p = 0.063) in the dominant model as the fitting model.

There was a marginally significant association between adequate knowledge and centers with increased HIV testing rates (OR 1.51; CI 95% 0.98–2.34; p = 0.063), as well as a statistically significant association between a strong knowledge base and centers with greater new HIV diagnosis rates (OR 1.61; CI 95% 1.04–2.49; p = 0.032).

Also, the main effect of group was marginally significant, F (1,33) = 3.7, p = .063, η g 2 = 0.04, with marginally more negative N400 amplitudes in the engineering ( M = −1.04, 95% CI [−1.5, −0.6]) than nonengineering ( M = −0.45, 95% CI [−0.9, 0.0]) students.

We found a marginally significant Group × Night interaction for the number of nocturnal awakenings ( F (2,64) = 2.894, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.083) with decreasing awakenings in the NM group and increasing awakenings in the HC group.

001, d = 1.18) and marginally significant higher on IOS ( t (53.92) = 1.90, p = 0.063, d = 0.46) than native Dutch.