“marginally significant”

Importantly, we also found a marginally significant testing × training regime interaction effect ( F 3,40 = 2.65, P = 0.062).

Analyzing FRN amplitudes at electrode site FCz (Figure 2 ) using peak-to-peak measures, we found a significant main effect of expectancy, F (1, 28) = 15.77, p < 0.001, and a marginally significant main effect of valence, F (1, 28) = 3.79, p = 0.062, showing more negative amplitudes for unexpected feedback and for losses compared to expected feedback and wins.

Warming had a marginally significant effect on A n ( P = 0.062; Table 2 ), decreasing rates by 4.9, 8.9 and 22 % in the low, medium and high warming plots, respectively, compared with ambient ( Fig. 2 ; Table 2 ).

The centered interaction term using training regimen and session was added to the regression model and accounted for a marginally significant amount of variance in the correlation between fluid intelligence and training gain, ΔR 2 = .101, ΔF (1, 26) = 3.80, b = -.034, t (26) = -1.950, p = .062 (see Fig 5 ).

Intensity An LME model with random slopes showed a significant effect of Emotion [ β = 6.393 (SE = 2.364), t (351) = −2.704, p = 0.0072], a marginally significant two-way interaction between Age and Emotion [ β = 0.3916 (SE = 0.209), t (351) = −1.873, p = 0.062], a significant two-way interaction between Sex and Sentence [ β = 0.8233 (SE = 0.404), t (351) = 2.037, p = 0.0425], a three-way interaction among Sex, Emotion, and Sentence [ β = −1.447 (SE = 0.572), t (351) = −2.531, p = 0.0118], a marginally significant three-way interaction among Age, Sex, and Sentence [ β = −0.0559 (SE = 0.0297), t (347.827) = −1.879, p = 0.0611], and a four-way interaction among Age, Sex, Emotion, and Sentence [ β = 0.099 (SE = 0.042), t (351) = 2.358, p = 0.0189].

For the pointed script bi-morphemic words were read more accurately than mono-morphemic words [significant in 5th grade ( t (28) = 2.544, p = 0.017) and marginally significant in 2nd grade ( t (26) = 1.951, p = 0.062)].

In the total population, patients with Ki67 ≥14% had marginally significant shorter PFS than those with Ki67 <14% [6.0 vs. 10.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–3.96; P=0.062; Figure 1A ].

Although the dietary diversity of the complementary diets remained very low, like in other parts of the country [ 10 , 45 ], it was marginally significant; considerably higher children in the intervention than comparison group at endline were fed on diverse diets (DID of 9.5, p = 0.062).

This same effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.062) in the ANCOVA analysis.

Variance of cortisone was not significantly explained by the group contrasts RCU vs DCU (F (1,136) = 1.01, P = .317, η 2 = 0.007), but a marginally significant difference was found for the contrast controls vs RCU (F (1,136) = 3.53, P = .062, η 2 = 0.025).

However, results revealed a marginally significant three-way interaction effect, F [1,187] = 3.53, p = 0.062, η η 2 = 0.02, favoring Hypothesis 2.

We merely observed a marginally significant effect of target position, with slower reactions to left (863 ms) than to right targets (641 ms; F (1,9) = 4.53, p = 0.062, ƞ 2 = 0.335).

Sociability Perceptions of sociability were also influenced by a marginally significant trait by trait-score interaction, p = .062.

After model adjustment for baseline risk factors, the OR remained significant for type II DM (aOR: 2.16; CI: 1.18-3.94; P = 0.012), QRS > 120 (aOR: 2.18; CI: 1.02-4.66; P = 0.045) and marginally significant for supraventricular arrhythmias (aOR: 1.82; CI: 0.97-3.42; P = 0.062).

In contrast, hsa-miR-143-3p exhibited a similar significant suppression effect in 293T cells only (31%, P < 0.001), while the effect in HepG2 cells was marginally significant (14%, P = 0.062).

The main effect of Stimulus Category was marginally significant ( F (1, 35) = 3.723, p = 0.062, η 2 = 0.096), with words in environmental print showing a longer latency of the first fixation in the word AOIs compared to ordinary words ( t (36) = 1.929, p = 0.062, d = 0.963).

Simple effects analyses indicated that compared to low integration, high integration in both the extraverted and introverted groups demonstrated a marginally significant higher level of life satisfaction ( p = 0.062 for extravert and p = 0.067 for introvert).

The main effect of emotional consistency was marginally significant ( F (2,34) = 3.012, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.151).

Furthermore, the difference in disease-free survival (DFS) using the cutoff of subtraction expression levels (BUB1B-PINK1) < 6.95 showed a marginally significant difference in developing metastasis (log-rank p = 0.062).

The presence of an A allele for rs75400242 showed a marginally significant association with greater IGF1R expression (P=0.062, Figure 5C ).

Subjective data Besides marginally significant higher pleasantness ratings of the CS+ after the preconditioning phase [ t (38) = 1.92, p = 0.062], there were no further reliable effects [all F s < 2.13, all p s > 0.152].

Insulin iAUC was 9.9% lower following the EBJ meal challenge, but this effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.062). 3.3.

The difference between the mild and moderate pain groups was marginally significant (OR = 1.737, 95% CI: 0.972–3.104, P = 0.062).

A mixed effect logistic regression, predicting the likelihood of making this type of error (1, 0) by condition, controlling for time point and problem type revealed that this difference was marginally significant: Children in the action condition made more adding-the-first-two-numbers errors than children in the gesture condition [χ 2 (1) = 3.50, p = 0.062].

Her impaired left leg had a significant increase in hip joint ROM (5.8 ± 2.4 deg, p = 0.019) during backward walking and a marginally significant increase in knee joint ROM (9.0 ± 6.7 deg, p = 0.062) during the left side stepping.