“marginally significant”

There was no statistically detectable interaction among the treatments ( F 1,6 = 0.29, p = 0.59); however, there was a marginally significant brood effect ( F 6,18 = 2.9, p = 0.03).

The approximately 40-kDa procathepsin B exhibited a marginally significant increase of 93±27% (mean±SEM; P<0.03) in the PADK-treated group as compared to vehicle-injected transgenic mice samples ( Fig. 4A and B ).

Only the African sample showed marginally significant F ST higher than zero (0.08, p=0.03, not significant after Bonferroni correction), while other populations all had slightly negative estimates pointing to the limited role of the TYR locus in genetic differentiation within studied (sub-) continental groups ( Table S5 ) [ 74 ].

There was a marginally significant improvement observed in children with IH in whom the treatment was started after 12 months of age (p = 0.03).

At maximum concentrations, significant and marginally significant effects on larval survival were seen with azoxystrobin ( p = 0.03) and trifloxystrobin ( p = 0.07).

There was a marginally significant positive correlation between (C) HLA-B population promiscuity level and intracellular pathogen diversity (Spearman’s rho: 0.34, P = 0.03) and (D) no significant correlation between extracellular pathogen diversity and HLA-B population promiscuity level (Spearman’s rho: 0.25, P = 0.12).

With Bonferroni adjustment for 15 comparisons ( Figure 1 ), leg-minus-forearm differences were marginally significant ( P =0.03–0.06).

[ 23 ], their cohort included adults and children with IgAN and a correlation between percent Gd-IgA1/IgA and contemporaneous UPCR was found to be marginally significant ( r = 0.25, P = 0.03).

Furthermore, marginally significant association was also observed for lung cancer and head neck cancer with OR of 2.38 (95%CI: 1.06-5.36, P=0.03) and of 2.40 (95%CI: 1.46-3.93, P=0.001), respectively.

In addition, the univariate comparisons indicated a marginally significant main effect of personalised risk message on positive outcome expectancies, F (1, 324) = 5.00, p = .03, η p 2 = .02 (α = .025).

Interestingly, at the same time, marginally significant reductions were seen in HbA 1c ( p = 0.03) and leptin levels ( p = 0.03).

We were able to detect expression of all genes under the described conditions except for BAX , but only PHLDA3 showed a marginally significant higher expression in B0/- feathers (Student’s t-test, P = 0.03; S3 Fig ).

There was a marginally significant interaction of cue presence and directional cue type, F (1,81) = 4.67, p = .03, η p 2 = .06, indicating, if anything, that there was a larger difference in performance between the control and arrow conditions than the control and human figure conditions.

Selection of treatment strategy on the basis of 18 F-FDG PET/CT alone was significantly associated with the survival outcomes at nine months (P=0.03) and marginally significant at 12 months (P=0.03).

Similar results were obtained when taxa were divided into ecological groups, with the exception of marginally significant differences in neurocranial disparity between arboreal ( P = 0.03) and folivorous ( P = 0.048) marsupials and placentals; however, these exceptions were not supported after Bonferroni correction.

Again, we did not find significant differences between groups (CL/SC) except for number of awakenings which was marginally significant ( P = .03) but nonsignificant after correcting for multiple testing.

The (transformed) DASS‐21 negative mood index was entered in the last step and explained 14% of additional variance, Δ F (1, 300) = 87.49, p < 0.001; DASS‐21 was significantly positively associated with IA symptoms, while Executive Dysfunction, age and gender—but not SR—remained significant, and Apathy now showed a weak, marginally significant ( p = 0.03) negative relationship to IAT scores as an apparent suppressor variable effect.

Interestingly, rs2471083 alleles, regardless of their parental origin, show marginally significant association (P = 0.03) with KCNK9 expression levels in the hippocampus ( http://www.broadinstitute.org/gtex/ ).

Finally, Interaction Consistency (E7) had a marginally significant effect on PU (β = 0.105, p = 0.030), yet showed no significant effects on PEOU or BI (p > 0.05).

A marginally significant recall direction by domain interaction was identified ( F (1,36) = 4.99; p = .03; η 2 = .12), with spatial backward spans significantly longer than verbal backward spans while no significant differences between spatial and verbal forward spans was identified.

For Q 10dB values derived from middle-turn measurements obtained with stimulus levels of 50–70 dB SPL, a repeated-measures ANOVA (with stimulus level and measurement type as within-subjects factors) revealed no significant main effect of measurement type ( F (1,5) = 0.11, P = 0.75), a significant main effect of stimulus level ( F (2,10) = 50.35, P < 0.001), and a marginally significant interaction between stimulus level and measurement type ( F (2,10) = 4.88, P = 0.03).

Four additional SNPs within IKBKAP also showed marginally significant association ( p < 0.03) with HSCR.

High and significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 93.56, p < 0.001) existed and the publication bias was marginally significant ( p = 0.03).

This was marginally significant ( p = 0.03; binary logistic regression with gender as the factor).

Regarding rapid naming accuracy which had marginally significant improvement after the intervention ( p = .03), the trend of improvement in TPT ( p = .05) also seemed more apparent than that of CLR ( p = .18).