“marginally significant”

In one phase of their task, the FRN measure showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.06) positive association with extraversion (specifically a measure of agentic extraversion) amongst participants given a placebo.

Linear regression of the executive index did detect a marginally significant group difference ( R 2 =0.10, F (7,120)=1.98, P =0.06).

Association between pathobiological markers of breast cancer including tumor size and Ki-67 and the relationship of these variables with DAI and age As shown in Table 5 , we found a positive and marginally significant relationship between tumor size and the Ki-67 marker (correlation coefficient = 0.14, p = 0.06).

When included together with the three attitude factors (ie, benefits, efficiency, and problems) in a regression analysis for predicting the overall satisfaction with the new system, conformity values had a marginally significant effect (t = 1.92, P < .06).

friend lower rating) on the N400 amplitude revealed a marginally significant main effect of direction, with the friend higher condition eliciting a more negative N400 than the friend lower condition, F (1, 32) = 3.90, P = 0.06 ( Fig. 2B ).

The mean difference between evaluations of fairness in the PJ ( M = 1.93, SD = 1.03) and no PJ condition ( M = 1.46, SD = 0.60) was marginally significant, F (43) = 3.62, MSE = 0.69, p = 0.06, η 2 = . 08 .

The W -score by sex interaction was marginally significant for visuospatial memory in the right hOc1 ( β = 4.57, p = 0.06).

A 2 × 3 mixed-modelANOVA on IQ showed that there was a marginally significant main effect of age ( p = .06) but no main effect of group ( p = .1) and no age × group interaction ( p = .8).

However, a marginally significant relationship was observed between SRT and SQR benefits under the slow DRC condition, r (31) = .33, p = .06.

There was a marginally significant effect of Direction, F (1,11) = 4.2, MSE = 127.3, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, reflecting the slightly larger corrective positioning during rightward drift noted above.

The interaction between experiment and phase was marginally significant, F (1, 34) = 3.07, p =.06, η p 2 = 0.10.

However, the significant decrease noted by this method in the left hemisphere between (Hi, MOF) was also marginally significant in native space analysis ( P = 0.06).

There was also a marginally significant difference (multivariable-adjusted p = 0.06) in EQ-5D VAS scores between older and younger adults ( Table 2 ).

In the 12-month-olds, there was a marginally significant main effect of gaze congruency ( F (1, 15) = 4.01, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.21), wherein amplitudes were greater during incongruent (9.3°) than congruent trials (9.0°).

Nevertheless, an independent measures t -test revealed a marginally significant difference in that adult rats reared more than adolescents during presentation of the light ( t (30) = 2.0, P = 0.06).

In contrast, in the orthographic input group, the migrations originated both from one and from two lines above/below the target: 67% of their migrations originated from the adjacent line, and 33% from two lines above/below the target (with a marginally significant difference between one and two lines above, W = 25, p = 0.06, and with no difference between the first and the second word in the target pair).

MMA had positive associations with the newborn birth weight (β = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.02–0.42, p = 0.034), and a marginally significant positive association with 1-min Apgar scores (β = 0.21, 95% CI: −0.01–0.44, p = 0.06).

However, for conventional affective arousal index Aff(Ar.c) , the session × group interaction was marginally significant ( F (1, 36) = 3.77, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.10).

Overall, there was a significant interaction between rank and round ( F 3,18 = 4.839, P = 0.01), in addition to significant main effect for round ( F 3,18 = 3.613, P = 0.003) and marginally significant effect for rank ( F 1,6 = 5.341, P = 0.06).

Concordantly, women who reported no milk consumption showed marginally significant higher age-adjusted (1.54, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.44, p=0.06) and multivariable-adjusted (1.56, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.46, p=0.06) HR for MOF compared with women who consumed <250 mL/d of milk.

A marginally significant negative interaction was found between online entertainment/communication activities and education ( b =–1.038, P =.06), indicating that these online activities are more effective in reducing distress for individuals with lower education compared with those with higher education.

For the HTQ, this correlation was marginally significant ( r =0.15, p =0.06).

We report significant ( P ≤ 0.05) and marginally significant (0.05 < P ≤ 0.06) effects of the models sequentially as the sentence unfolds over time.

For CRP, excluding the single highly influential subject produced a substantially smaller estimated PM2.5 effect that was marginally significant (p = 0.06).

Although the effect of crop sequence was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) for the Shannon index in 2016, the effect of season was significant ( p < 0.01) and an interaction was observed between crop sequences and season in 2016 ( Table 1 ).