The RTs between neutral-distractor and no-distractor showed a marginally significant difference ( t = 2.19, p = .06, all p value corrected by Holm method).This results suggested that participants’ attention was captured more in reward-distractor than in loss-distractor and neutral-distractor condition, see Fig. 2A .
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
When NH participants were tested monaurally, the difference between congruent and incongruent trials was no longer present ( z = 0.48, p = .63), though a comparison with the binaural listening condition yielded a marginally significant difference (congruency and listening condition, X 2 (2) = 3.52, p = .06), and their CE did not differ from that measured among uHL, bCI, and uCI users (all ps > .19).
B2B2 is marginally significant dedicator (P=0.06).
The results of the robust regression analyses have shown that the relationship between SLA and the mean daily temperature (Logged air temperature, T L ) was generally non-significant, with the exception of a marginally significant association with T L in the summer (b = 4.2954, p < 0.06).
Within the generalized estimating equations model, marginally significant time × group interaction effects were found in the FACT-B scores (quality of life) from T0 to T2 ( p = 0.06; see Table 1 ).
Among the subset of these individuals whose scores improved after watching the assigned video, the intervention group saw higher mean attitude score improvements on the 5-point scale that were marginally significant (Cohen’s d=0.35 with 95% CI −0.01 to 0.70, two-sided t-test, p=0.06).
The Egger’s test was marginally significant for a possible publication bias for studies of anxiety ( p = 0.06), but the trim-and-fill analysis left the SMD unchanged.
Comparison of the ROC curves revealed no significant difference in the clinical values of ChE and CRP ( P =0.93) or those of cholinesterase and IL-6 ( P =0.99), although the clinical values of ChE and PCT exhibited a marginally significant difference ( P =0.06).
After removing the two outliers with FAST scores above 4, the correlation remained significant for GFAP ( r = 0.40, p = 0.009) and was marginally significant for ptau-181 ( r = 0.31, p = 0.06).
Moreover, a significant reduction in visceral fat ( p = 0.01) and a marginally significant decrease in BMI ( p = 0.06) were observed in the DASH group compared to the control group after adjusting for potential confounders.
The joint effect of the FMPS dimensions was marginally significant in predicting NSSI, χ2(4) = 9.15, p = 0.06.
However, there was a marginally significant difference in SART reaction times (seconds) between T1 ( M = 0.37, SE = 0.008) and T2 ( M = 0.39, SE = 0.009), F (1, 48) = 3.60, p = 0.06, with the means indicating that the participants were slower on the SART task post-training. 4 Discussion AI-related technologies are developed with the goal of augmenting and improving human efficiency.
Results: Twenty-three patients (76.5%) and 15 controls (50 %) showed hypoechogenicity of RN, which was marginally significant (P=0.06).
Alternatively, when comparing patients with full intended dose of BV with those with any dose reduction of BV, the latter had better PFS rates, and this difference in PFS was marginally significant ( P value = .06; supplemental Figure 1 in the supplemental Appendix ).
Pairwise comparison showed that the difference between sex congruent and incongruent trials in the “above 12” group was not significant for face stimuli ( p = 0.5), but marginally significant for body stimuli ( p = 0.06).
The interaction was marginally significant (β Subjective Stress × Nutritional Awareness = 0.07, p < 0.06).
For the indoor group, the intervention had only a marginally significant effect [b = 8.133, t(194.52) = 1.89, p = .060].
In addition, there was a significant main effect of reinforcement (F(1,41) = 10.50, P = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.20), such that trials paired with shock showed greater amygdala activity than trials not paired with shock, and a marginally significant main effect of condition (F(1,41) = 3.89, P = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.09), such that trials paired with social support figures showed greater amygdala activity than trials paired with strangers.
The interaction between ER time windows and groups was marginally significant (F(3,75) = 2.52, p = 0.06) ( Figure 4 ).
However, the SFBT group exhibited a marginally significant lower integral value of oxy-Hb compared to the AC group ( P =0.060).
The main effect of trauma on sense of meaningfulness was marginally significant, F (1,92) = 3.51, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.04, with lower scores in the trauma group ( M = 4.27, SD = 1.16) than in the control group ( M = 4.63, SD = 1.05; t (94) = −1.87, p Bonferroni = .06, d = −0.39), suggesting that recalling trauma experience threatened the sense of meaningfulness in life.
In the case of the scores achieved on the PE factor, there was a marginally significant difference between these two age groups: χ 2 (2) = 5.633 p = 0.060.
velikensis changed their mean elevation from 393 m to 520 m (i.e., a 127 m uphill shift, which means an average shift of about 2 m per year), and the difference was marginally significant ( W = 9099, p = 0.060) ( Figure 3 A).
Significant differences were observed in age ( P = .018), work status ( P = .014), and comorbidity profile ( P = .007), and a marginally significant difference was observed in education ( P = .06).
On page 5 the authors report “...a marginally significant difference in competence between black and white (-11.52, p = .06)”.