“marginally significant”

The main effect of Hemispheres was marginally significant (F (1,41) = 3.722; p = 0.06; ƞ p2 = 0.083), while the Condition by Hemispheres interaction was significant ( F (3,123) = 3.293; p = 0.02; ƞ p2 = 0.074).

Among those 119 SjS patients, the titer of IgG-anti-EA antibody was inversely related to the levels of C3 (r = -0.31, P < 0.001) and C4 (r = -0.20, P = 0.03), and a marginally significant inverse correlation between IgG-anti-VCA antibody titer and C3 level was also observed (r = -0.17, P = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).

Correlation analysis showed a positive albeit marginally significant association between workload and JA ( r = 0.17, p = 0.06), whereas zero-order correlations between log cortisol/DHEA(S) ratio and workload ( r = 0.07, p = 0.46) or JA ( r = 0.10, p = 0.28) were not significant.

Also, two factors, number of relapses and CRS grade, were shown to have significant relations to MRD-negative CR ( p < 0.05, Tables 2 , 3 ), while the relation between CRS grade and CR was marginally significant ( p = 0.06, Table 3 ).

Indeed, the slope of the association between global affect reactivity and milk cortisone for the women with the highest quartile of mental health symptoms was not significant ( p = 0.46), while the slope of the women with the lowest quartile of mental health symptoms was marginally significant ( p = 0.06). 3.2.3 Exploratory Analyses Exploratory analyses demonstrated that participants in the stressor group had a significantly higher CC‐ratio compared to the control group (Figure 4 and Table S2 ).

In terms of FXAND, 20 PM allele carriers (66.7%) were diagnosed with depression, with the likelihood of depression being significantly reduced for carriers of PM alleles with greater AR-Sb ( p = 0.02, Figure 4 a) or marginally significant for carriers of PM alleles with higher AR-mPCR ( p = 0.06, 335 Figure 4 b).

Also, in the complete case analysis, the association between occasional tobacco use and lower participation was marginally significant ( P =.06).

In terms of the direct paths from reading conditions to the outcome, there was a marginally significant direct path from Agent non‐DR to the story comprehension score ( β = −0.34, p = .06), suggesting that children in the Agent non‐DR condition may have had lower learning performance compared to those in the Agent DR condition while controlling for irrelevant and relevant vocalization mediators and other covariates.

This effect was marginally significant in the left amygdala ( t = 1.6, P = 0.06, d = 0.35).

Beyond that, the post-hoc comparison following the Games-Howell procedure revealed that the difference between assimilation and marginalization was marginally significant for anger-in ( p = 0.06).

The moderator variable, the interaction between prime and extraversion, was a marginally significant predictor of Risk-Taking in the GDT, F (3,69) = 2.54, p = 0.06.

Values above the median for nADC 75 were marginally significant (HR = 0.618, 95% CI = 0.326–1.170, p = 0.06).

There were no significant differences between the intervention groups at baseline although number of years teaching in current school was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

r = .125 was, however, marginally significant ( p = .06) and in the predicted direction.

276 msec We found a marginally significant interaction response type (2) X word type (2) [ F (1,16) = 4.04, p = .06, ηp2 = .20, ηG2 = .02; LME: beta = −2.2, t = −1.06, p = .29].

Overall, meta-analysis results of the random effects model showed marginally significant reduction in BMI levels compared to pre-Ramadan levels as shown in Fig. 6 [SMD=0.09, 95% CI=([−]0.00-0.18), P =0.06].

Duration of breastfeeding was no longer significant in country-constrained PERMANOVA after FDR correction; however, it was a marginally significant factor in CAR alone (FDR-adjusted p = 0.06).

The main effect of trauma on sense of meaningfulness was marginally significant, F (1,92) = 3.51, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.04, with lower scores in the trauma group ( M = 4.27, SD = 1.16) than in the control group ( M = 4.63, SD = 1.05; t (94) = −1.87, p Bonferroni = .06, d = −0.39), suggesting that recalling trauma experience threatened the sense of meaningfulness in life.

Also, there was a marginally significant difference for intake of fish ( p = 0.06) and low-fat dairy ( p = 0.07).

The interaction between emotion and location was still marginally significant, F (2,13) = 3.141, p = 0.060.

Results A Group (bilinguals, musicians, bilingual musicians, and controls) by Congruency (congruent, neutral, and incongruent) ANOVA conducted on response time data yielded a significant main effect of Congruency, F (2,430) = 453.58, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.68, a marginally significant main effect of Group, F (3,430) = 2.50, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.03, and a significant interaction between Group and Congruency, F (6,430) = 3.87, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.05.

One of the regression models identified a marginally significant ( P = 0.06) inverse association between depressive symptoms and PA.

In addition, there was a marginally significant difference in blood Leucocytes count ( p = 0.06) and fecal Calprotectin ( p = 0.06) between the three groups. 3.2.

We first found a marginally significant trend indicating that the greater the frequency with which one was bullied, the greater the economic costs one endured: r (37) = .32, p = .06.

Total caloric intake was marginally significant (p < 0.06) between children of single-parent households (1910 ± 24) and dual-parent households (1,860 ± 25).