“marginally significant”

Partial correlation (controlling for AGE GROUP) between event-related SICI modulation at BL and atDCS-induced ΔSICI rest pooled over all time points after stimulation revealed a marginally significant association between event-related SICI modulation and stimulation induced change in resting-state SICI [τ = 0.24, T (29) = 1.86, p = 0.06], indicating more pronounced atDCS-induced SICI effect with better modulatory capacity of event-related SICI.

Indeed, Wistar rats showed only a marginally significant decrease in BBB permeability from PND7 to PND20 (Tukey’s test: p = 0.06), whereas in OXYS rats, this parameter decreased from PND7 to PND14 significantly (Tukey’s test: p < 0.0002), and this decline continued during the third week of life (from PND14 to PND20; Tukey’s test: p < 0.04).

Pollen non-abortion rates only differed in a marginally significant way across reproductive phenotypes (F 2,36 = 3.00, p = 0.06).

undulatus females when described by the PC spectral analysis ( figure 5 ), significantly so in terms of brightness (Tukey post hoc : p < 0.001) and marginally significant in terms of UV reflectance (Tukey post hoc : p = 0.06).

On the contrary, the comparison between late deaf CI recipients and their matched controls revealed a significant main effect of Condition (F(1.5, 27.8) = 50.6, p<0.001, effect size η p 2 = 0.3) but only a marginally significant interaction between Condition and Group (F(1.5, 27.8) = 3.3, p = 0.06, effect size η p 2 = 0.2).

We observed a positive relationship of ungulate prey biomass with distance to settlements ( r = 0.71; P < 0.001; HDI 95 = 0.61 to 0.79; Fig 3A ) and distance to roads ( r = 0.34; P < 0.001; HDI 95 = 0.21 to 0.48; Fig 3B ), and a marginally significant relationship with access to rivers ( r = 0.19; P = 0.06, HDI 95 = 0.02 to 0.33; Fig 3C ).

A one-way MANOVA showed a marginally significant main effect of the experimental conditions on the PAD scale: F (3, 99) = 2.58, p = .06, Wilk’s Λ = 0.93, partial η 2 = .07, d = 0.56; with notably less positive affect and more arousal.

In the monthly family income subgroup, caregivers with incomes between 1000 and 3000 RMB (approximately US $149-446) showed a marginally significant trend toward higher scores in the control group ( t 9 =6.422, P =.06), and no statistical differences were observed in the higher income groups.

With regard to perceived likability, there was a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (3, 144) = 2.59, p = .06, η p 2 = .05, with the neutral sender and the angry sender receiving particularly low likability scores.

This revealed marginally significant differences between fingers and toes ( F 2,6 = 4.58, p = 0.06) and significant differences between digits ( F 4,12 = 13.27, p < 0.0005).

Moreover, the 2 groups had a marginally significant difference in technique correctness (mean=98.79 [SD=4.88] for the adherent group and 97.19 [SD=7.80] for the non-adherent group; P =0.06; Cohen’s d =0.25).

In addition, valence group × task interactions were marginally significant [ F (2, 40) = 3.07, p = 0.06].

There was some evidence that grazer utilization may increase the percentage bare ground in tufted attractor‐dominated sites: the best model included only a positive and marginally significant effect of dung abundance on percentage bare ground ( F 1,13 = 4.312, p = .06; Figure 5 ; Table S7 ); however, the simpler intercept only model received similar support (ΔAICc = 1.115). 4.

This difference was statistically marginally significant (P = 0.06).

Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival using the log rank test for group comparisons revealed a marginally significant difference in overall survival ( p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant effect on egoistic motives (b = 0.23, SE = 0.12, p = 0.06).

The linear regression analyses of the gene expression data associated with dSNPs over the cultivar registration years revealed significantly ( p < 0.001) increased expressions of the associated genes at the early seedling stage from early to recent oat cultivars ( Figure S8A ), and a marginally significant ( p < 0.06) decrease in expressions of the associated genes from early to recent wheat cultivars ( Figure S8B ). 3.4.

The interaction was not significant in the other channels of interest, however, there was a marginally significant trend in channel 6, which is the other midline channel (channel 6: F (1,16) = 4.08, P = 0.060; cf. channel 5: F (1,16) = 2.38, P = 0.144; channel 2: F (1,16) = 0.03, P = 0.863).

A marginally significant difference emerged in perceived fear between the MS group ( M = 6.17, SD = 3.01) and the control group ( M = 5.19, SD = 3.13; t (1, 138) = 1.89, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.32, 95%CI [−0.01, 0.66]).

The correlation between LAI and leaf chlorophyll content is marginally significant (Spearman's rho = 0.62, n = 10, p = 0.06) (Figure 9d ).

Linear regression of the executive index did detect a marginally significant group difference ( R 2 =0.10, F (7,120)=1.98, P =0.06).

sanctipalustris ( p = 0.060, marginally significant), N. tunga (0.002), and N. vrijeuni ( p = 0.003) in terms of the dominant frequency ( Figs. 5 and 6 , Table S9 ).

There was also a marginally significant positive interaction between rainfall and forest integrity (coefficient Wald z ‐test, p = 0.06), suggesting stronger cassowary avoidance of wetter‐degraded forest compared to drier‐degraded forest.

Also similar to men, the gap between whites and U.S.-born Hispanics converges, although the one-year difference for women born in the 1980s remains marginally significant (p = 0.06).

The difference was marginally significant ( t = 1.96, p < 0.06), but it did not produce effects on the N400 amplitude.