Comparison between pulses revealed that survival of beetles from high complexity landscape (HC) was 23% higher after the second pulse compared to the first, but the observed difference was marginally significant (t-ratio = 1.861, df = 166, p = 0.06).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
ANOVA also revealed marginally significant interaction between self-referential type and caudality [ F (8,136) = 2.78, p = 0.06].
The correlation coefficient for the Dutch elderly population was marginally significant (ρ = -0.40, p-value = 0.06).
Smoking was also less prevalent in the placebo group; the difference was marginally significant (χ 2 df = 1 = 3.5, p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).
After adjustment for the number of live births, the difference between the two ethnic groups (Slavs vs Tartars and Bashkirs) was marginally significant ( P =0.06) suggesting that this is largely because of different reproductive patterns ( Remennick, 1989 ).
There were marginally significant gene-nutrient interactions between αENaC A663T genotypes and available zinc intake in women ( p = 0.06; Figure 2 ). 4.
There was a marginally significant trend towards increasing HRV in the propranolol group ( F 1,216.8 = 3.72, P = 0.06).
A favorable pathological response showed marginally significant and no association with DSS and OS ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.2), respectively.
In a multivariate model, percentage change in tumor size at the first assessment was a marginally significant positive predictor for PFS ( P = .06).
There were also marginally significant interactions between tillage and sampling time each year (2012: F 5,40 = 2.29, P = 0.06 and 2013: F 5,40 = 2.33, P = 0.06).
We found a marginally significant interaction between group, valence, and congruity, F (2,40) = 3, MSE = 570, p < 0.06 (see Figure 6 ).
The effect of rhythm modality was marginally significant, F (1, 19) = 3.93, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.17 (Bayes factor 2.3: 1 in favor of the effect), with a trend of somewhat greater d’ for A than for AV.
The marginal effect of time was driven by slightly better detection for changes that occurred after 500 ms (coinciding with trajectory changes in that condition, but note that there was no interaction) than those that occur shortly before, an effect that was marginally significant ( t (14) = 2.05, p = 0.06, d’ = 0.53), opposite to the behavioral cost associated with resetting.
The difference between the correlation coefficients was marginally significant ( z = 1.49, p = 0.06). 4.3.
The W -score by sex interaction was marginally significant for visuospatial memory in the right hOc1 ( β = 4.57, p = 0.06).
Two markers from the dietary recall were significant predictors: the lagged number of kilocalories (marginally significant at p = 0.06) and the contemporaneous percent calories from carbohydrates.
Firthermore, health blogs reliance only showed marginally significant association with vaccination behavior (b = 0.14, SE = 0.07, t = 1.92, p = 0.06).
There was a very strong, marginally significant negative linear relationship for the LINE-1 assay for β-BHC (β = −0.98; p = 0.06).
The interaction term between sex and perceived neighborhood social cohesion was marginally significant ( p =.06, ESM 4 in supplemental file).
Here, NGSD are the only significant contribution to the dingo group in the two-lineage models, but this signal is mostly lost when three lineages are used, although there was a marginally significant contribution from NGSD ( p = 0.06).
A significant two-way stage x sex interaction influencing infusions [F (1, 28) = 4.56, p < .05] and a marginally significant three-way strain x lever x sex interaction influencing lever pressing [F (1, 28) = 3.79, p = .06] indicated that escalation was sex dependent and that lever pressing varied as a function of the relationship between strain, lever, and sex.
We detected 14 (37.8%) lincRNA/mRNA pairs with the H2H type, which shows marginally significant over-representation ( p = 0.06, one-sided Binomial test) relative to the global distribution.
For L-dopa ( Figure 2(f) ), a one-way ANOVA revealed only a marginally significant effect on PPI overall ( F (4, 35) = 2.46, P = 0.06).
The results found a marginally significant interaction effect between cerebral perfusion and ApoE4 carrier status on global cognition: VCAT(β=0.2286, p=0.060), and EM: RAVLT delayed (β=0.298, p=0.024), WAIS‐Logical Story (β=0.392, p=0.007).
The effect of the interaction between adducts treated as a categorical variable (detectable/nondetectable) and ETS was also significant on birth weight ( p = 0.04) and marginally significant on head circumference ( p = 0.06).