“marginally significant”

Additionally, for the picture area, there was a marginally significant difference on fixation duration between the two conditions ( b = 0.45, SE = 0.23, t = 1.96, p = 0.06) and the fixation duration of the congruent condition was shorter than that of the incongruent condition.

Overall, meta-analysis results of the random effects model showed marginally significant reduction in BMI levels compared to pre-Ramadan levels as shown in Fig. 6 [SMD=0.09, 95% CI=([−]0.00-0.18), P =0.06].

1.534 ± 0.363); however, the pattern was reversed, that is, the SD group showed marginally significant increased left DMPFC activation when making effortful choices for others ( F (1, 61) = 3.58, p = .060, η 2 p = 0.055; 1.183 ± 0.333 vs. 0.271 ± 0.349).

Group differences for self-reports on ADHD were marginally significant, with participants who played SC ( M = 12.33, SE = 0.74) reporting higher scores than those who played UT ( M = 10.24, SE = 0.76), t (33) = 1.98, p = 0.06, d = 0.67.

Grit had a significant negative relationship with anxiety ( r = −0.30, P < 0.05) and marginally significant relationship with depression ( r = −0.24, P = 0.06).

11 Also, that study reported lower reading scores for those born at 39 weeks than those born at 40 weeks, although the difference was marginally significant ( P = .06).

In left-handers, the relationship between BAS and alpha asymmetry was marginally significant in the reversed direction (r = .56, p = .06), despite the small number of left-handers in our sample (N = 12).

A two-way ANOVA revealed that there is no significant differences in NO x − concentrations in males compared to females over PC and BL regions in normal weight plus overweight/obese subjects, but there is a marginally significant interaction between gender and BMI on NO x − concentrations over PC regions only (F 1,41 = 3.9, P = 0.06).

Statistically significant summary RRs were found for NO 2 , PM 10 , and O 3 , while the combined RR for SO 2 was marginally significant (p = 0.060).

6 ), and the correlation between them was negative and marginally significant (r = − 0.25, p = 0.06).

The kaempferol concentration was almost doubled in EF leaves compared to F leaves; this difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

After the phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), the negative linear relationships were still significant in 2018 (R 2 = 0.34, p < 0.05) and marginally significant in 2019 (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.06), which indicated that the phylogenetic effect did not change the trade-off relationships ( Table S1 ).

In the radiomics model, wavelet.LHL_glcm_Correlation emerged as a marginally significant predictor (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 2.59–98.60, p = 0.06), suggesting its potential relevance in survival prediction and underscoring the value of texture-based imaging features in capturing tumor characteristics.

The results showed that the interaction between Group and Test was marginally significant ( F (1,20) = 3.82, p = .06, η 2 p = .16).

MLM results indicated significant training effects for scenario 4 at post ( b = 0.43, p = 0.013, 95% CI [0.09, 0.78]) and marginally significant effects at 6-month follow-up ( b = 0.32, p = 0.06, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.66]).

However, only a marginally significant effect on the interaction of risk feedback and emotion regulation to predict selective exposure was found ( b = 0.49; p = 0.06; R 2 change when adding the moderator = 0.004; see Table 2 ), and the main effect of risk feedback that was found before disappeared when including the interaction term.

As a result, there was a significant correlation between the intervention group and ΔDASS-anxiety ( r = 0.35, p < 0.05); ΔDASS-depression and ΔDASS-stress showed a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.29, p = 0.06; r = 0.26, p = 0.09, respectively).

If the analysis was limited to patients with severe RI (≦30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ), similar results were obtained on both univariate and multivariate analyses, although urinary albumin ≦25% at baseline became marginally significant ( Tables 4 , P =0.06).

The reduction was statistically significant in adar2(RNAi) animals (p < 0.05) and marginally significant in adar1(RNAi) animals (p = 0.06).

Of these 114 genes, 27 had an identified IRP2 peak in our data, an overlap that is marginally significant ( P = 0.06, Fisher’s Exact Test).

An effect of task set was evident in a significant interaction between task set and congruency, F (1, 23) = 8.80, p = .007, η p 2 = 0.28, and a marginally significant three-way interaction between task set, configuration type, and congruency, F (1, 23) = 3.91, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.15.

The difference between treatment groups was marginally significant (estimate ± SE = 10.4 ± 5.2, t = 2.0, p = 0.06).

Pairwise post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons [ 36 ] revealed significantly reduced trabecular bone mineral density in ovariectomized (0.11±0.0088 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 9.0, p<0.001) and AP-treated groups (0.15±1.85 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 7.0, p<0.001) relative to sham (0.26±0.028 g/cm 3 ) but only a marginally significant difference between sham and the ALEN -treated ovariectomized rat values (0.19±0.0058 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 3.5, p=0.06).

The interaction between quantity and group was marginally significant, F (7, 224) = 2, p = .06, η p 2 = .05.

Phylogenetic signals of initial leaf toughness, initial litter chemical traits and changes of litter chemical traits during decomposition under different environmental conditions There was a marginally significant phylogenetic signal in the initial leaf toughness ( Fig 1 : K = 0.46, P = 0.06), and a significant phylogenetic signal was also found in 5 out of 10 initial chemical traits, i.e. for [C], [N], [S], [K] and [Ca] ( Table 2 , P < 0.05); but not for [P], [Mg], [Mn], [Fe] and [Zn] ( Table 1 , P ≥ 0.19).