“marginally significant”

However, no significant association was found between allelic frequencies of ADIPOQ rs822396 and obesity, whereas the association of ADIPOQ rs1501299 attenuated and became marginally significant after Bonferroni correction (p>0.025).

If we ignore the marginally significant interaction and combine the two groups, focusing on the main effect of time, differences in state anxiety are found between all three time points ( p = 0.025 comparing pre-test and mid-test means; p < 0.001 comparing pre-test and post-test means; and, and p < 0.001 comparing mid-test and post-test means).

PCIs were the least accurately reported, with low and marginally significant correlations ( r = 0.21, p = 0.025) and very low reliability (ICC = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00–0.76).

Notably, moderate temperature and high humidity exhibited a marginally significant protective interaction ( β = − 0.039, 95% CI : − 0.072 to − 0.006, P = 0.025).

We noted a marginally significant negative correlation ( P = 0.025, Fig. 5K ) between MMSE and age-adjusted DNAm life span.

Advanced age was a marginally significant predictor of musculoskeletal discomfort in females ( p = 0.0254), but not in males ( p = 0.5748).

For the ANAM, only two subset scores showed marginally significant between-group differences from baseline to Week 6 (Simple Reaction Time Repeated throughput score P = 0.0256 and throughput standard score P = 0.0263).

However, we also observed a marginally significant difference in the first principal component between the strains with different foraging index ( Kruskal–Wallis test , P = 0.0259, see supplementary fig.

Only the independent variable Information showed (in Block 2, b path) a marginally significant beta coefficient for the mediator ( p =.026).

Adjusting for age, there was no effect of the pandemic on externalising (simple RR: 0.613, p<0.001; age-adjusted RR 0.936, p=0.452) and a small and marginally significant (taking into account multiple testing) effects on internalising (simple RR 0.920, p=0.026 and age-adjusted 1.307, p=0.040 respectively).

There was no substantive evidence for an increase in survival probability with trial number after normal sleep (though with a marginally significant p value) (main effect, BF 10 = 1.3, p = 0.026, Figure 3 C), however strong evidence for a decrease in survival probability with trial number following sleep deprivation (interaction effect: BF 10 > 1000, p < 0.001, Figure 3 C).

When focusing on the distribution of APOE isoforms within macroareas and a Chi-square test is performed, only the populations in the AFR macroarea provide a marginally significant result, with the Luhya (LWK) people highlighted as the only contribution towards significance (df = 2, p -value = 0.026), since this group presents a lower number of individuals with the ε2 and ε3 isoforms than what is expected, and a higher number of individuals with the ε4 isoform of APOE ( Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S3 ). 3.4.

For instance, there was a marginally significant relationship between the total needs change score and age (r s =0.212, p =.026), indicating that younger participants were more likely to show improvements.

1 The simple-effect of condition (Bonferroni corrected p = 0.025) revealed that novel stimuli (5.58 ± 3.30 μV) evoked larger amplitudes compared with familiar stimuli (2.68 ± 2.90 μV) in the high tendencies toward PIPU [ F (1, 26) = 57.74, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.69], but there was only a marginally significant difference in amplitude between stimuli (4.98 ± 3.51 vs. 3.71 ± 3.19 μV) for the low tendencies toward PIPU [ F (1, 24) = 5.62, p = 0.026, η 2 p = 0.19] groups (see Figure 2 ).

The gaps remained there pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, except for a marginally significant larger increase in high depressive symptomatology between Waves 9 and 10 among those not living alone (RR not_alone*wave10 = 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.02, 1.47; p = 0.026).

A test for multivariate homogeneity of group variances uncovered marginally significant differences among the groups ( p = 0.026, Table 1A ), which could potentially indicate the involvement of additional explanatory factors that were not accounted for in the model.

The SES × GG and SES × AG interaction terms are statistically marginally significant ( p = .026) and statistically significant ( p = .024), respectively.

For the olfactory condition the ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of interval [ F (5,60) = 2.76, p = 0.026, η 2 = 0.19].

The total numbers of birds observed, regardless of location, were similar between the different treatments at age 34 weeks, but treatment differences increased with age; at age 70 weeks, the greatest number of birds were observed for PB and the least for R ( Figure 3 b) (marginally significant interaction age.time.treatment, Wald 12 /ndf = 1.94 by GLMM; p = 0.026).

The change in particulate concentrations of mixture was marginally significant in almost all the sub-regions, except for Western Africa, which was statistically significant at p = 0.026, and Northern Africa, which was not significant ( p = 0.973).

Medicaid patients had a marginally significant difference in use of bevacizumab (M = 19.9/100000 OE, SD = 7.32) and aflibercept 2 mg (16.1/100000 OE, SD = 7.22) [t(6)]=2.95, p = 0.026].

Investigation of the metabolic feature impact in HD risk resulted in marginally significant results (average p -value = 0.026; Supplemental Table 24).

Left amygdala and left hippocampus activation was marginally significant for a coupling in the PTSD group ( P = 0.026).

To confirm that these trends are representative of whole genome patterns, I also analyzed a larger set of 13,659 genes sequenced in both species (2,335 X-linked and 11,424 autosomal; see Materials and Methods for details), which produced the same non-significant results for d N (median d N = 0.0039 for X-linked genes and 0.0038 for autosomal genes; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.76) and marginally significant results for ω (median ω = 0.092 for X-linked genes and 0.086 for autosomal genes; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.026).

However, 3 of them remain significant or marginally significant, i.e., OSMR (p=0.026), TP63 (p=0.028) and CACHD1 (p=0.081), suggesting they carry additional prognostic power.