Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0240.5× alphagold
4 , right panel); (b) for HLA-I, there was a marginally significant effect of Gene (P = 0.024, F-test), with higher PBA values for gene C (Fig. 5 A), whereas the Virus × Gene effect was not statistically significant (P = 0.166, Greenhouse–Geisser test) (Fig. 5 B); (c) For HLA-II, there was a significant effect of Gene (P = 0.011, F-test), with higher PBA values for gene DQB1 (Fig. 6 A), and the Virus × Gene effect was highly significant (P < 0.001, Greenhouse–Geisser test) (Fig. 6 B).
marginally significantp=0.0240.5× alphagold
This however increased in Kano state from 50.88% (SD=16.68) in 2018 to 54.20% (SD=20.34%) by 2021 with a marginally significant mean difference for both the one-tailed (p=0.024) and the two-tailed (p=0.048) t-test with a small effect size (Cohen’s d=−0.31; 95% CI=−0.608 to –0.003).
marginally significantP = 0.0240.5× alphagold
Stratified by marital status, a marginally significant association was observed between social isolation and an increased risk of physical dysfunction only in the married group (OR=1.289, 95% CI: 1.035–1.605; P = 0.024), and not in the single group (OR=1.541, 95% CI: 0.924–2.571; P = 0.098).
marginally significantP = 0.0240.5× alphagold
We found one marginally significant result: mutations within clusters tend to have a more radical molecular-volume change than mutations outside of clusters ( P = 0.024, n = 41), but the magnitude of the effect was small.
Detecting clusters of mutations.
PLoS One · 2008 · PMC2582452
marginally significantp = 0.0240.5× alphagold
Stratified analysis showed a significant association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of gastric cancer in case–control studies (RR = 0.44;95%CI:0.32–0.61, p < 0.001), and a marginally significant association in prospective cohort studies (RR = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.79–0.98, p = 0.024), respectively.
marginally significantP = 0.0250.5× alphagold
Behavior- Foraging Motivation Test There was a marginally significant effect of apparatus on proportion of test spent on the start platform ( P = 0.025) and latency to the wood shavings platform ( P = 0.029), but as apparatus was balanced with all other fixed effects, this has no bearing on results apart from its inclusion as a main effect likely increases power of the tests of fixed effects of interest.
marginally significantp = 0.0250.5× alphagold
A significant two-way interaction was found between the hemisphere of activity (right, left) and hand observed (right, left) in the precentral gyrus ( F (1, 22) = 18.73, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.46; Bonferroni-corrected p value: p < 0.004); this same interaction was also marginally significant in the inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis after correcting for multiple comparisons ( F (1), 22 = 5.74, p = 0.025, partial η 2 = 0.21; Bonferroni-corrected p value: p = 0.1).