Finally, regarding EE, a significant increase was seen in this variable from pre-test to post-test ( p = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.008–0.11), whereas a marginally significant decrease was found overall from post-test to follow-up ( p = 0.06, 95%CI: −0.003 to 0.18).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
No polymorphism showed association with bladder cancer risk at the 5% significance level, although individuals carrying the 280His variant allele had a marginally significant increased risk of bladder TCC compared to those carrying the homozygote wildtype genotype (adjusted OR [95% CI], 1.50 [0.98–2.28], p = 0.06).
Also, results showed a marginally significant three-way interaction effect of condition and time on impulse control, controlling for the presentation order, F (1,73) = 3.73; p = 0.06; η p 2 = 0.05.
This comparison found that marginally significant blood pressure decreases were more pronounced in the haloperidol + benzodiazepine group compared to olanzapine + benzodiazepine recipients ( P = .06).
Even if this result becomes marginally significant ( p = .06) when impulsivity-related variables are included in the regression model, it suggests that switching off FB-related notifications can constitute a protective factor against problematic use.
A marginally significant difference was identified between these two correlation coefficients ( z = 1.88 , p = 0.06 ). 4 Discussion In the present study, direct gaze had a significant overall impact on the behavioral data in both groups.
The effect of S1 on wrestling behavior was marginally significant (df = 10, t = 2.13, p = 0.06).
There was also a marginally significant increase in self-esteem (baseline mean 3.83, SD 0.74; treatment mean 3.93, SD 0.75; b =0.11, SE 0.06; t 132 =1.917; P= .06).
obscurus (weight shift) was negatively and significantly correlated with lipophilicity (r = −0.84, p = 0.03; Figure 3 A), where a marginally significant (r = −0.73, p = 0.06; Figure 3 B) negative tendency between the feeding behavior and logVP were observed. 3.
For the amygdala, there was a marginally significant main effect of group (F(1, 34) = 3.72, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.10) indicating greater activation in controls than patients across conditions.
-3.50±0.72%; P = 0.06). We observed a marginally significant decrease in SDBP (systolic to diastolic blood pressure) between the two groups after adjustment for waist circumference ( P = 0.06).
While the Consonant-Vowel contrast on the intercept term was not significant (β = 0.05, SE = 0.19, p = 0.81), its interaction with time was marginally significant (linear time parameter: β = 0.38, SE = 0.21, p = 0.06; cubic time parameter: β = −0.40, SE = 0.21, p = 0.06).
Between-group differences were not observed for any other measures; however, PSS for the audiovisual speech TOJ task was noteworthy in its marginally significant group differences (p = 0.06, Table 1 ) between CI users and controls (−78.2 ms and −7.83 ms, respective means), which is consistent with the PSS shift observed in response to the SJ speech task.
In the multivariate linear regression analysis, a marginally significant correlation was observed between TyG and length of hospital stay ( p = 0.06).
Regarding Europe, the short-term effect of clean energy shocks on tourism appears weakly negative and marginally significant ( p = 0.06), possibly reflecting transitional frictions or sectoral inertia.
The negative association of serum levels of BAFF ( r = −0.55, p = 0.002, n = 30) as well as marginally significant negative association of anti-Jo-1 levels ( r = −0.35, p = 0.06, n = 30) with disease duration was documented in early patients.
577, t (9) = 4.98, p = 0.0008), while individuals in Subgroup 2 showed a small, marginally significant (617 vs. 608, t (19) = 2.15, p = 0.060).
The interaction of gender and AUDIT-C group was marginally significant (p = 0.06).
The difference between the correlation coefficients was marginally significant ( z = 1.49, p = 0.06). 4.3.
We found a marginally significant negative effect of watering treatment on cover diversity ( p = .06, Figure 2 h) but no significant effect of OTC treatment on cover diversity.
In the ACC of facial recognition, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between musical emotion level and measure ( F (2, 60) = 3.46, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.06).
Three-group comparisons showed, however, a marginally significant effect of group on TL in naïve cytotoxic T cells ( F [2,34] = 3.07, p = 0.06) and a significant effect on TL in memory cytotoxic T cells ( F [2,13.7] = 5.68, p = 0.02), with a stepwise decrease in TL from non-depressed control subjects over MDD patients without CSA to MDD patients with CSA, who presented the shortest TL.
However, low education and poor income levels were found to associate with high increase of anxiety score at significant ( p = 0.01) and marginally significant levels ( p = 0.06), respectively.
Additionally, while the interaction effect for target absent RT was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the Bayes factor provided “anecdotal evidence” in support of the alternative hypothesis.
A generalized mixed effects regression analysis with number of self-referent word stimuli recalled as the negative binomial outcome variable and drift rate and stimuli valence as independent variables found a marginally significant interaction, β = −0.10, 95% CI [-0.21, 0.004], z = −1.89, p = .06.