Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
No polymorphism showed association with bladder cancer risk at the 5% significance level, although individuals carrying the 280His variant allele had a marginally significant increased risk of bladder TCC compared to those carrying the homozygote wildtype genotype (adjusted OR [95% CI], 1.50 [0.98–2.28], p = 0.06).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
obscurus (weight shift) was negatively and significantly correlated with lipophilicity (r = −0.84, p = 0.03; Figure 3 A), where a marginally significant (r = −0.73, p = 0.06; Figure 3 B) negative tendency between the feeding behavior and logVP were observed. 3.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Between-group differences were not observed for any other measures; however, PSS for the audiovisual speech TOJ task was noteworthy in its marginally significant group differences (p = 0.06, Table 1 ) between CI users and controls (−78.2 ms and −7.83 ms, respective means), which is consistent with the PSS shift observed in response to the SJ speech task.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The negative association of serum levels of BAFF ( r = −0.55, p = 0.002, n = 30) as well as marginally significant negative association of anti-Jo-1 levels ( r = −0.35, p = 0.06, n = 30) with disease duration was documented in early patients.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Three-group comparisons showed, however, a marginally significant effect of group on TL in naïve cytotoxic T cells ( F [2,34] = 3.07, p = 0.06) and a significant effect on TL in memory cytotoxic T cells ( F [2,13.7] = 5.68, p = 0.02), with a stepwise decrease in TL from non-depressed control subjects over MDD patients without CSA to MDD patients with CSA, who presented the shortest TL.
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
A generalized mixed effects regression analysis with number of self-referent word stimuli recalled as the negative binomial outcome variable and drift rate and stimuli valence as independent variables found a marginally significant interaction, β = −0.10, 95% CI [-0.21, 0.004], z = −1.89, p = .06.