“marginally significant”

Flavanones showed a marginally significant trend ( p for trend =0.05), with the highest intake quartile approaching statistical significance (OR = 0 .74, 95% CI: 0.55–1.01, p = 0.06).

In the multivariate linear regression analysis, a marginally significant correlation was observed between TyG and length of hospital stay ( p = 0.06).

Regarding Europe, the short-term effect of clean energy shocks on tourism appears weakly negative and marginally significant ( p = 0.06), possibly reflecting transitional frictions or sectoral inertia.

Compared to lower tertile of sugar uptake EE, the upper tertile was associated with marginally significant higher odds of prediabetes and diabetes (OR=2.1 (95% CI: 0.9, 4.9; P = 0.06)) and marginally significant higher HOMA-IR (OR=2.6 (1.0, 6.8; P = 0.06 )) among overweight and obese participants.

However, the FE model showed a marginally significant negative association between the number of distinct medication types and FPG levels (−0.027, 95% CI: −0.055 to 0.001, p=0.060).

(2) Algorithmic awareness has a marginally significant positive effect on the level of perceived power, β = 0.62, SE = 0.32, p = 0.06.

Although no baseline differences were observed between the CR and CR + Ex groups, a marginally significant time × intervention interaction (β = –0.43, p = 0.06) suggests that the addition of exercise may have attenuated the increase in PD compared to caloric restriction alone.

A marginally significant negative interaction was found between online entertainment/communication activities and education ( b =–1.038, P =.06), indicating that these online activities are more effective in reducing distress for individuals with lower education compared with those with higher education.

After the phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), the negative linear relationships were still significant in 2018 (R 2 = 0.34, p < 0.05) and marginally significant in 2019 (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.06), which indicated that the phylogenetic effect did not change the trade-off relationships ( Table S1 ).

More traditional GRS beliefs were associated with higher centrality ( B = 0.38, p = 0.01, Δ R 2 = 0.06), and the interaction term was marginally significant ( B = −0.50, p = 0.06, Δ R 2 = 0.05), suggesting a potential moderating effect.

SaO 2 increased during the L compared to the F phase at HH independently of the exercise intensity ( p ≤ 0.01), with marginally significant results ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.090, for low and high intensity, respectively) and moderate effect sizes at low intensity (Cohen’s d = 0.484) and high intensity (Cohen’s d = 0.326), as can be seen in Fig. 5 .

Vessel density, vessel grouping index, and fiber thickness contributed significantly to PC1 (loadings > ±0.6; p < 0.05), whereas hydraulic vessel diameter showed a marginally significant contribution (loading = 0.56; p = 0.06; Table S1 ).

Between-group comparisons showed that at 1 month, the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in anxiety ( P = .03) and a marginally significant improvement in depression ( P = .06) compared to the control group.

variegatum ; this difference was marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.41, df = 1, p -value = 0.06).

The Poisson mixed model exploring the number of central details recalled 1 week after encoding revealed a marginally significant main effect of age group ( β = 0.21, SE = 0.11, χ 2 (1) = 3.55, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.43], p = 0.06), with a tendency of young adults reporting more central details than older adults, and a main effect of recall type ( β = − 0.61, SE = 0.04, χ 2 (1) = 184.10, 95% CI [− 0.69, − 0.52], p < 0.001; See Table 2 for mean values), with participants recalling more central details for videos recalled multiple times than only once.

Anti-AMA1 antibodies showed a marginally significant association with increased malaria risk: for the secondary case definition, the adjusted IRR was 1.28 (95% CI: 0.97–1.71; p = 0.06), with a similar trend for the primary case definition (IRR = 1.36; p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant difference between average valence of the positive videos among the primed groups ( F 2,295 = 2.83, p = .06, ηp 2 = .02), where those in the positive group rated the videos as more negative while those in the negative group rated the videos as more positive.

In that model, irrigation did not clearly impact beetle richness ( β = 0.48, p = 0.60) and bulk density had only a marginally significant negative effect on beetle richness ( β = −0.08, p = 0.06).

The three genera also showed a marginally significant effect on δ 13 C WSC in sporocarps ( P = 0.06, analysis of covariant).

Post-hoc pairwise t-tests for Trails A indicated that the HC group's improvement across visits was marginally significant, t(15) = -2.04, p = .060 ).

Though the AUC for 7T MRI was higher than that of 3T, the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

However, multivariate analysis revealed that SRI >6 weeks had a marginally significant impact on LC (p=0.060) and served as an independent prognostic factor for DSS (p<0.005).

Parent specific effects were not found in our sample, a GLM including parent (father/mother) as additional factor did not show a significant effect for parent , ( F (1,45) = 0.099, p = 0.75), while the main effect group and the interaction effect group × parenting style remained unchanged; the marginally significant main effect parenting style was not significant anymore, p = 0.06, due to model complexity.

Calculated p -values for the interaction between time and redemption status were significant for the coordination of care subscale ( p = 0.02) and total P3C score ( p = 0.01), and marginally significant for the communication subscale ( p = 0.06).

The SI values for the non-rewarded cue were also elevated in preterm mice (Term NR =0.11 ± 0.19, Preterm NR = 0.2 ± 0.07), but the differences in their distribution between term and preterm mice were marginally significant (K-S test, D = 0.41, p = 0.06), likely due to the low number of significantly modulated neurons (Term=16 and Preterm=23).