“marginally significant”

A marginally significant difference was found between SS-nL patients and HCs (44.5% vs. 38.7%, OR [95% CI]: 1.27 [0.99–1.60], p = 0.06).

A repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of GLP1-RA treatment on several efficacy measures over time, revealing that there was a statistically significant difference in mean HbA1c ( p = 0.003), BW ( p = 0.0013) and BMI ( p = 0.0015) between at least two groups, and a marginally significant difference in FPG ( p = 0.06).

The interaction term for assessment of risk heterogeneity across sex was marginally significant in rectal cancer ( p = 0.06).

Significant main effects for EF strength ( F (2,200) = 25.56, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.12) and ion presence ( F (1,201) = 8.40, p < 0.005, η p 2 = 0.04) as well as a marginally significant interaction between both factors ( p = 0.06) were found.

Significant differences were observed in age ( P = .018), work status ( P = .014), and comorbidity profile ( P = .007), and a marginally significant difference was observed in education ( P = .06).

Effects of the intervention on olfactory performance Linear mixed model (LMM) comparing the change in olfactory threshold as a result of the intervention between the two groups, controlling for age, revealed a marginally significant main effect of the intervention, F (1,318) = 3.4, p = 0.06, and a significant and robust main effect of group, F (1,318) = 199.8, p < 0.001, but no interaction of these two factors, F (1,318) = 0.02, p = 0.88, suggesting a small increase in olfactory sensitivity in both groups as a result of the intervention.

There was a marginally significant interaction between emotion and AOI (F(6,282) = 2.1; p = 0.06).

In Models 2 and Model 3, the association between evolocumab use and discharge mRS of 0–3 was marginally significant (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 0.97–4.24, p = 0.06 and adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.94–4.22, p = 0.07, respectively).

The resulst of the pair-wise comparisons also revealed that there was a marginally significant difference in terms of response time between the near- (M = 15.77 s per case) and far-transfer cases (M = 18.80 s per case, p = 0.06).

Of these BUD patients, benzodiazepine type and duration of use were marginally significant ( p ~0.06), suggesting that BUD were associated more with oxazepam use and with longer benzodiazepine use.

Living alone at baseline is considered a risk factor for a larger number of falls at the end of the study ( p = 0.004), and age is marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.060). 4.

Compared to patients not reporting ACE and anxiety comorbidity, the ACE + Anxiety group had elevated B cell, T cell, and macrophage infiltration, although this was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

But we observed no effect of phenotype ( F = 1.05, R 2 = 0.01, p = 0.20), and only a marginally significant interaction between environment and phenotype ( F = 1.10, R 2 = 0.01, p = 0.06).

SHAPS The repeated-measures ANCOVA for SHAPS yielded a marginally significant within-subjects main effect of time ( F 1,789 = 3.54, P = .06, η p 2 = .004), and a significant time*user-group interaction effect ( F 1,789 = 6.49, P = .01, η p 2 = .008) in the direction of greater increase in scores from before to after lockdown for controls compared with users.

No other significant correlations were detected between behavioral data and impulsivity scores ( Table 1 ), although a marginally significant correlation between the average number of adjusted blue balloons and the global score of the BIS-10 (r = −0.46, p = 0.06) was observed. 3.2.

However, no significant effect between the scan method and scan setting was found, although the interaction between tooth and scan method was significant ( p < 0.0001) and the interaction between scan method and examiner, marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Moreover, according to the Delong test, the differences of AUCs between the clinicoradiological and combined models were marginally significant for the AUCs at 2 years (P=0.06), 3 years (P=0.05), and 5 years (P=0.07) ( Table S4 ).

Marginally significant differences were recorded on comparing the presence of pain by age intervals (chi-squared = 5.612, p=0.06).

And the difference is higher in under 50 year-old participants (marginally significant; p-value=0.06)) rather over 50 year-old participants ( Figures 4 , 5 and 6 ,) Differences in the expression of miRs in two groups First,Ct of each sample was determined.The relative differences in expressions were calculatedby Δct method for miR.

Step 3 examining motivators for weight loss was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Computational Modeling The two-way GLM on learning rate yielded a significant main effect of Time ( F (1, 44) = 21.76, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.33) and a marginally significant Time X Group interaction ( F (1, 44) = 3.58, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.075).

( Table 1 ) The two groups were comparable in terms of mean NDI during pre-operative period ( p -value = 0.060; marginally significant), 3 months post-surgery ( p -value = 0.445) and 1 year post-surgery ( p -value = 0.465).

In a reanalysis of Moore et al.’s study 1, we found a marginally significant interaction of God salience by God salience manipulation check responses ( β = −1.65, P < 0.06); when participants in the God salient condition actually reported lower levels of thinking about God, they were significantly less positive ( M = 52.12) toward AI-based recommendations than those who reported higher levels of thinking about God ( M = 55.98; β = −1.52, P = 0.006).

A marginally significant association was found between the presence of the SDF-1 (c801A) allele and the development of PDR ( n = 89 eyes, p = 0.06).

For the lower part of the stem (below 2 m), statistically significant differences in relative volume growth were observed based on the length of the bark stripping scars ( p = 0.02); however, in the case of full stem volume and the upper section of the tree, the differences were marginally significant ( p ≥ 0.06–0.09).