Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
The expression of RiMST2 and RiPT in the +M plants showed a similar trend to P status, with significant or marginally significant ( P = 0.058) decreases by LP in the late growth stage but no significant effects in the early growth stage.
marginally significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
After adjusting for sociodemographic variables (sex, age, race and ethnicity, educational level, and marital status), physical activity, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, hypertension, CKD, BMI, and HbA1c in model 3, the association between Klotho and KS was marginally significant (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.57–1.01; p = 0.058).
marginally significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Interestingly, 1 memory B cell subcluster (C2) with relative upregulation of MALAT1 , which was reported to be associated with viability of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell, 39 and TXNIP , which is required for expansion of germinal center B cell, 40 showed marginally significant depletion in IST non-responders ( P = 0.058; Figure 6 C–E).
marginally significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
As expected, ES24-7 silage exhibited higher T-AOC, GSH-Px, and CAT activities than RSMTD-1 silage ( P ≤ 0.001), and CAT activity was not detected in RSMTD-1 silage. Dry matter intake, milk production, and whey antioxidant capacity of dairy goats The DMI of the dairy goats fed diet containing either RSMTD-1 or ES24-7 silage was not different ( P > 0.05; Table 3 ), however, there was a higher significant ECM ( P = 0.009) and marginally significant ( P = 0.058) 3.5% FCM in the goats fed with ES24-7 silage.
marginally significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
3 Results 3.1 Behavioural results As seen from Table 1 , there was a marginally significant difference between the boys and girls in reading accuracy, as reflected by character recognition (t = 1.916, df = 101.9, p = 0.058), but the sex difference in reading comprehension, as reflected by silent sentence reading, was not significant (t = 1.200, df = 94.713, p = 0.233).
marginally significantP =0.0581.2× alphagold
Analysis adjustment by age showed that the patients with presence of G/G genotype for the rs3826392 variant have a protective effect for TNM III+IV stages (OR=0.45; 95% CI=0.23-0.87, P =0.027); while, individuals with the T/T genotype for the rs3809728 variant, have a marginally significant difference for TNM III+IV stages (OR=2.28; 95% CI=1.03- 5.03, P =0.058) ( Table 4 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
The cold-acclimated RT rats had higher levels of Ucp1 ( T = 3.708, P = 0.010, df = 6), Tfam ( T = 4.968, P = 0.003, df = 6), Prdm16 ( T = 3.376, P = 0.023, df = 6), and Pgc1a ( T = 2.378, P = 0.058, df = 6, marginally significant) expression in BAT, and the cold-acclimated RN rats had higher levels of Ucp1 ( T = 2.981, P = 0.025, df = 6) and Pgc1a ( T = 3.282, P = 0.035, df = 6) expression in BAT ( Fig. 4f ).