Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.05761.2× alphagold
Furthermore, MR significantly upregulated the mRNA expression of Psd‐95 ( p < 0.01) and Bdnf ( p < 0.05) in AD+Sh‐NC mice compared with those fed ND, but brain FGFR1 knockdown offset these beneficial effects, with Psd‐95 showing a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.0576) and Bdnf showing a significant reduction ( p < 0.05) (Figure 6J ; Figure S5B ).
marginally significantp = 0.05771.2× alphagold
The results for non-expanded coefficients are in line with the previous model, positive for proportion of people aged 15-24 and 55-64 years (the latter with a marginally significant value of p = 0.0577), negative for proportions of seniors, unemployed, and immigrants, and positive for proportion of English speakers and highly educated population.
marginally significantp = 0.05771.2× alphagold
Watershed was a significant predictor variable in the PFOS model ( χ 2 [df] = 11.63 [4], p = 0.0203) (Table S4 ), and while pairwise contrasts of watersheds were generally not significant (with the exception of the marginally significant Lake Ontario/Lake Superior contrast; p = 0.0577), modeled PFOS concentrations increased from west to east: Lake Superior < Lake Michigan ≅ Lake Huron < Lake Erie < Lake Ontario (Table 1 ; Figure 3 and Figure S6 ).
marginally significantP = 0.05791.2× alphagold
The intervention package also had a marginally significant impact ( P = 0.0579) on the reported motivation to analyze VPD data, as the mean Likert scale responses in the intervention group increased by 0.41 while the mean responses decreased by 0.59 in the control group pre and post-test.
marginally significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Relationships of drought-tolerance diversity with community stability were weak: We found a marginally significant positive effect of functional diversity of stomatal control on community stability ( t = 1.92, P = 0.058) but no significant relationship with functional diversity of resistance-acquisition ( t = 1.12, P = 0.27; fig.
marginally significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
However, there were significant sex-related differences between clusters for Period 2, χ 2 (3, N = 220) = 15.38, p = 0.002; for Period 3, χ 2 (3, N = 190) = 7.92, p = 0.047; and (marginally significant) for Period 4, χ 2 (3, N = 162) = 7.39, p = 0.058.
marginally significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
OA showed marginally significant lower use of rEV information [mean SD rEV r 2 values YA: 0.40 0.13, OA: 0.35 0.13, between group difference t (97) = 1.92, p = 0.058, d = 0.40], without alteration in the use of pWIN information [mean SD pWIN r 2 values YA: 0.03 0.04, OA: 0.04 0.04, between group difference t (96) = 1.27, p = 0.21, d = 0.27].