“marginally significant”

Although this association was marginally significant in the crude model ( P = 0.058), adjustment for potential confounders strengthened the associations ( P = 0.022).

Based on our multivariate analysis, appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment also appeared to be a protective factor that can reduce the mortality rate, although this effect was marginally significant (OR = 2.526, P = 0.058).

However, a marginally significant three-way interaction emerged for body dissatisfaction within the ANCOVA analyses, F (3, 312) = 2.52, p = .058, ηp2 = .02.

The restriction digest controls form high leverage points when modelling this as a function of the number of PCR cycles, leading to significant or marginally significant models ( S25A–S25C Fig ) (30xCA: p = 0.058, 20xATCT: p<0.001, 10xATCT: p<0.001; GAM).

We then proceeded to analyze the reports from the analog rating scale (Figure 2 ) and found a marginally significant difference in pleasure between the three priming conditions [ F (2, 27) = 3.175, p = 0.058], Group 1 scoring the highest ( M = 7.2, SD = 1.55) and Group 3 the lowest ( M = 5.7, SD = 1.34).

The interaction between guilt communication mode and violation degree was marginally significant for investment repair, F = 2.90, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.037.

Not only was this pattern identified when all FC edges were examined, but, suggestively, it was also identified for the subset of edges comprising higher-order RSN nodes (the binomial test results are marginally significant, however; p = 0.058).

We found a marginally significant positive relationship between perceived ecological resource scarcity and PEB frequency ( r = 0.12, p = .058).

6C ), while the state × condition interaction was marginally significant ( F (1, 71) = 3.72, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.050).

A likelihood ratio test comparing this unconstrained model (M3 in Table 7 ) to the most constrained model (M1) was marginally significant ( Δ χ ( Δ d f = 2 ) 2 = 5.68, p = 0.058), ΔRMSEA = 0.01, ΔCFI = 0.01.

Analysis adjustment by age showed that the patients with presence of G/G genotype for the rs3826392 variant have a protective effect for TNM III+IV stages (OR=0.45; 95% CI=0.23-0.87, P =0.027); while, individuals with the T/T genotype for the rs3809728 variant, have a marginally significant difference for TNM III+IV stages (OR=2.28; 95% CI=1.03- 5.03, P =0.058) ( Table 4 ).

rs6498169 showed a marginally significant trend between HT subjects and control group under codominant model ( P = 0.058), dominant model ( P = 0.054) and under recessive model ( P = 0.050).

Interrupted or diminished physical activity during the pandemic was a marginally significant predictor of HADS Anxiety scores (β = −0.09, p = 0.058), and a trend was observed for the age variable in predicting HADS Anxiety scores (β = −0.09, p = 0.066, younger individuals with higher scores than older ones).

After accounting for the influences of the pre-exposure covariates, causal mediation analysis using the IOW approach showed that SHS exposure at home had a non-significant NDE (OR NDE =1.40; 95% CI: 0.90–2.17, p=0.133), marginally significant NIE (OR NIE =1.12; 95% CI: 1.00–1.26, p=0.058) jointly mediated through asthma and self-reported smoking status with a proportion of 29.6% mediated effect on the likelihood of atopic dermatitis ( Table 2 ).

The regression model explained 14.0% of the variance in this criterion variable, which was marginally significant [ F (3, 49) = 2.668, p = 0.058].

Additionally, PTE showed significant effects for individuals aged 17–59 (SMD = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.11~1.75, p = 0.027) and had marginally significant effects on improving EFs in adults aged 59 and older (SMD = 0.62, 95%CI = −0.02~1.25, p = 0.058). 4.

Crucially, the analysis revealed a marginally significant Interaction Type × Noise interaction effect, F (1, 285) = 3.62, p = .058, η 2 = .01.

However, a marginally significant difference in RTs between the two groups for disengaging by conflict [ F (1,56) = 3.734, p = 0.058, ω 2 = 0.044], suggesting that the effects tend to be lower for AVGPs (15.52 ± 51.68) than for NAVGPs (47.49 ± 57.09) 2 , although the effect size was relatively small.

Furthermore, as expected, the males we studied showed higher mean social ADI-R score (20.1 ± 5.9) than females ([17.4 ± 5.6; although the two-sample t -test showed only a marginally significant difference between sexes ( p -value = 0.058)].

In addition, we can note a marginally significant result (p = 0.058) for the intervention effect in reducing the prevalence of lack of control over drinking behavior (OR adj = 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.02).

However, the measure of family religious practices was a marginally significant positive correlate of purpose for males ( ß = .20, p = .058).

There was a marginally significant interaction between habitat type and year on non‐native richness ( p = 0.058) in the direction of non‐native species increasing more rapidly in anthropogenic parks, but otherwise habitat type did not have a significant impact on richness, abundance, or proportion of native individuals ( p > 0.09).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction between male gender and secondary educational level, [209.78 (−6.94–426.51), p = 0.058].

The association with severe obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ) was marginally significant (aOR 2.247, 95% CI: 0.971–5.197, p =0.058) ( Table 2 ).

We found no evidence of significant correlations between genetic load and reproduction or lifespan for each founder lineage, except for the marginally significant positive trend in Ghost Ranch between pup production and realised genetic load ( R = 0.22, p = 0.058).