“marginally significant”

S1 a) or marginally significant for Bray Curtis dissimilarities (p > 0.057, PERMANOVA, R 2 = 0.062; Fig S1 a).

Does Green Space Type Matter? A Kruskal–Wallis test to compare mean ranks of EM value for SES by green space type showed marginally significant results (χ 2 (3) = 7.492, p = 0.057).

However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one.

However, the differences in discharge rates between the two occupational types tended to be marginally significant after adjusting for others covariates ( P -value=0.057) (Figure 3 , C).

In female rats, a marginally significant group difference was observed on the immobility measure ( F (2, 36) = 3.127, P = 0.057).

Additionally, we observed a trend for smokers to be more susceptible to MACE compared with nonsmokers, with a marginally significant association ( P = 0.057).

For N2, notes had a marginally significant main effect, F(2, 98) = 2.95, p = 0.057, and no significant difference was found between any pair of the three notes, and there was no significant main effect of age.

Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant effects on food consumption knowledge, food consumption behavior, and QoL domains, including physical, kidney disease-specific, and total QoL scores (p < 0.05), with a marginally significant effect observed for mental health (p = 0.057).

The main effect of epoch was marginally significant, F (2.601, 36.410) = 2.865, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.170, BF 10 = 133.666, with 19 ms faster in Epoch 10 compared with Epoch 1 (651 and 670 ms of Epochs 10 and 1, respectively).

Following a similar trend, the correlation difference between rS-pS and rU-pU groups was also found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.057) in tumors compared to non-tumor tissues ( Supplementary Figure 4E ).

A marginally significant main effect of roles on error rates was observed ( p = 0.057), suggesting that actors had better memories for shopping lists than eyewitnesses.

The LF/HF ratio showed a marginally significant trend towards being higher in the schizophrenia group compared with the healthy control group [ F (1, 49) = 3.791, p = 0.057].

The total indirect effect was marginally significant (β = 0.845, 95% CI [−0.025, 1.715], p = .057).

The model exhibited marginally significant moderation effects (QM = 13.7, df = 7, P = 0.057) and accounted for all the between-study variance (100%).

The interaction between Congruency × Subgroup was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.78, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.061, indicating that the congruency effect might differ systematically across the two masking conditions.

There was no significant difference in overall survival between high and low risk patients according to N stage (N0-N1) ( P =0.13) and marginally significant discriminatory effect of tumor stage (T1-T2) ( P =0.057) between high risk versus low risk.

Ethnic subgroup differences in levels of pandemic stress were marginally significant ( p = 0.057), with Southeast Asians reporting higher levels than East Asians ( p = 0.07).

For all the eyes that were analyzed, the success rate at the final visit was 78% for the IVB group and 56% for the control group, which was marginally significant ( P = 0.057 by chi-square test).

However, comparing the efficacy of the combination relative to the efficacy of its separate components, we found that anti CTLA-4 + cisplatin had a marginally significant ( p = 0.057) synergistic effect relative to either anti CTLA-4 or cisplatin alone.

Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction Time x Group ( F 2.80, 64.39 = 2.70, p = .057, η p 2 = .11) was evident.

There was a marginally significant reduction in within-flock mortality in Period II compared with Period I ( P = 0.057).

3 b), we only detected a marginally significant ( P = 0.057) direct and negative effect of hatching date on reproductive status, i.e., females born earlier in the season were more likely to become a breeder as 1-year-olds.

Parasomnia, speech disorders, and cardiovascular disorders had higher RORs in women, while insomnia-related disorders, cognitive disorders, and movement disorders (marginally significant, p = 0.057) had higher RORs in men.

The negative link between backward scores and the DLQ was marginally significant ( r = –0.19, 95% CI = –0.37; –0.06, p = 0.057), suggesting that this WM measure may also be related to self-reported cognitive difficulties in everyday life.

Without controlling for SNR 2, there is a marginally significant positive association between PR‐Smiling and Laughing scores and left DMN functional connectivity ( F (5, 29) = 2.45, p = 0.057) ( R 2 = 0.30, Adjusted R 2 = 0.18), but not right DMN functional connectivity ( F (5, 29) = 0.31, p = 0.902) ( R 2 = 0.23, Adjusted R 2 = −0.11). 3.5 Exploratory Bayesian Analysis To test the extent of the association between PR‐Smiling and Laughing scores and left DMN functional connectivity, we employed a Bayesian regression analysis in JASP (Version 0.18.3; Coon et al. 2025 ; Kelter 2020 ).