“marginally significant”

There was however a marginally significant negative correlation between participants’ scores on the non-planning factor of the BIS-11 and accuracy on the causal attribution task, r = −0.229, n = 70, p = 0.057.

Employing generalised additive models, we found a lower rate of antidepressant prescriptions for people living within 100 m of higher density of street trees—although this relationship was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) when confounding factors were considered.

This effect was marginally significant after 35 days (F 3,4 = 6.09, p = 0.057) and statistically significant after 64 days (F 3,4 = 7.27, p = 0.043, Fig. 4C ).

Post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonfferoni-Holmes corrected) revealed significant difference between FB and TB condition: t = −3.18, p = 0.007, marginally significant difference between FB and TB modified conditions: t = −2.25, p = 0.057, and no significant difference between TB and TB modified conditions: t = 0.93, p = 0.36 ( Figure 2 ).

Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction Time x Group ( F 2.80, 64.39 = 2.70, p = .057, η p 2 = .11) was evident.

Anti-phase tACS also induced a marginally significant reduction in accuracy when compared to in-phase tACS (t(38) = −1.958, p = 0.057, Cohen’s d = 0.314; permuted paired t -test) ( S3A Fig ).

For the outcome binge drinking four or more times we found marginally significant interaction between intervention x baseline lifetime binge drinking (OR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.12–1.03, p < 0.057) and with stating it would be ok if I drank more (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.16–1.12, p < 0.084,).

The coefficient difference test indicates that the urban–rural gap in public-sphere pro-environmental behaviors is marginally significant ( p = 0.057), while the gap in private-sphere pro-environmental behaviors is not ( p = 0.433).

The interaction effect between skill level and AOI was marginally significant ( F (1.69, 28.78) = 3.33, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.16, ε = 0.42).

There was also a two-way interaction between typicality and reader type, F (1, 16) = 4.90, P = 0.042, a significant main effect of typicality, F (1, 16) = 35.15, P < 0.0005, and a marginally significant main effect of reader type, F (1, 16) = 4.20, P = 0.057.

Interestingly, there was a marginally significant increase ( p = 0.057) in BeS excreted in 80-min samples between the decontamination interventions and controls.

Participants were more likely to use health care services if a family member cared for them during the illness; however, the association was marginally significant (OR 1.77; 95% CI 0.98 – 3.19; p = 0.057).

There was a marginally significant effect of WM load, F (2,87) = 2.95, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.064.

The plant species × seed volume interaction was marginally significant (Wald χ 2 1 = 3.62, p = 0.057).

A Wilcoxon test verified significant increases in neutrophil percentages in mice exposed to PD2021 dust ( P = 0.029) and WI2020 dust ( P = 0.029) and a marginally significant increase in neutrophil recruitment in animals exposed to WI2021 dust ( P = 0.057) as compared to their contemporaneous controls.

ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Ending ( F (1,28) = 3.94, p = .057, η p 2 = .12), a significant main effect of Anteriority ( F (2,56) = 5.04, p < .05, η p 2 = .15), and a significant Crowding × Ending interaction ( F (1,28) = 9.16, p < .01, η p 2 = .25).

A Fischer’s exact test between the correlations of pTBIs and HCs showed a marginally significant difference in the correlation strength between God Image and IRI Empathic Concern (Z = 1.58, p = 0.057), indicating that greater empathy was associated with a more intense connection to divine entities, particularly in HCs.

A marginally significant difference from zero for the slopes at 1 SD below the mean (29 years; B = 0.30, SE = 0.16, p = 0.057) indicated the trend that younger age and a higher social media use time were associated with higher levels of perceived loneliness.

The main effect of Gender was marginally significant for accuracy (F(1, 58) = 3.8, p = 0.057 [p = 0.062]).

We found a marginally significant effect of number of digits when comparing force production with 2, 3, and 5 digits ( p = 0.057), with NRMSE being lowest in the 2-digit case.

Regarding the evolution of fitness in the RC lines, only the treatment was marginally significant for ω measured relative to the appropriate G0 ancestor ( F 1 = 4.26, p = 0.057).

The main effect of response portion was non-significant for the averaged-peak amplitudes ( F (1,55) = 0.244, p = 0.624), but marginally significant for the latencies ( F (1,55) = 3.77, p = 0.057), reflecting the fact that the averaged-peak latencies were slightly longer for the steady-state than for the transition portion (Fig. 3a , bottom right panel).

Meanwhile, the association between LTL and total FFMQ score became marginally significant after age was controlled for in the model, β = .15, ΔR 2 = .02, p = .057 (see Table 5 ).

For the season (Grain yield 1), the quadratic component of the inoculant rate response was not significant ( p = 0.358) when analyzed across varieties, but the Rate 2 × Variety interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.057), indicating some variation in curvature among varieties.

In all of the regional models, atmospheric deposition of nitrogen was found to be a statistically significant predictor of stream TN load, with the exception of the marginally significant contributions in the Missouri Drainage (MRB4) ( p = 0.057) and Pacific Northwest (MRB7) ( p = 0.105) models.