“marginally significant”

Bilingualism had a positive and marginally significant effect on Cognition ( β = 0.050, SE = 0.026, p = 0.057).

A marginally significant between-group difference in the magnitude of reduction in the NLC episode duration from Baseline to Visit 2 ( p = 0.057) and a significant between-group difference from Baseline to Visit 3 ( p = 0.004) were identified, indicating a larger reduction in the mean NLC episode duration in MOMH group.

Furthermore, patients with PAD show statistically significant differences for HbO 2 before and after treatment (0.022±0.004 before, 0.036±0.006 after, P=0.029), while the change in THb before and after treatment is marginally significant or (0.045±0.006 before, 0.067±0.009 after, P=0.057) and the corresponding change in SO 2 is non-significant (P=0.287).

However, there was marginally significant differences for IQ (p = 0.057), with subjects from the INST group demonstrating a slightly higher IQ.

When the provider identification variable was removed from the model, age was marginally significant (p = 0.057) and device generation was highly statistically significant (p = 0.001).

In addition, the interaction between group and valence was marginally significant, F (1, 57) = 3.769, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.062.

A Fischer’s exact test between the correlations of pTBIs and HCs showed a marginally significant difference in the correlation strength between God Image and IRI Empathic Concern (Z = 1.58, p = 0.057), indicating that greater empathy was associated with a more intense connection to divine entities, particularly in HCs.

The reduction in mitochondrial complexes I and II was marginally significant ( P =0.057 and P =0.097, respectively).

There were marginally significant effects of the design for the ROI posterior to BA2 ( p = 0.057) were pRF width was larger in the fast ER design (consistent with Extended Data Fig. 4-2 ) and in BA3b ( p = 0.078), where the pRF width was larger in the slow ER design (consistent with Fig. 3 B ).

On the average grasp-point variance JA showed marginally significant differences on the memory associated condition ( M = 20.69 cm) compared to healthy controls ( M = 12.78 cm, p = 0.057, t = 1.691; an estimated 94.26% falling below JA’s score) and non-apraxic controls ( M = 12.92 cm, p = 0.055, t = 1.798; an estimated 94.50% falling below JA’s score) controls.

7 When the 20 participants with compromised behavioural data are removed, the association between change in R-DS activation and accuracy at Time 2 is marginally significant ( P = 0.057).

The LF/HF ratio showed a marginally significant trend towards being higher in the schizophrenia group compared with the healthy control group [ F (1, 49) = 3.791, p = 0.057].

We observed that the main effect of craving in the final model was marginally significant (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.99 to 2.41, P = 0.057).

Notably, the differential proportions of subjects with a ZBI score ≥ 41 (moderate-to-severe burden) between baseline (59.2%) and post-intervention (50.0%) was marginally significant (p=0.057).

The focal interaction remained significant for skepticism of alternative medicine, b = 0.10, SE = 0.04, p = 0.004, and marginally significant for science beliefs, b = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.057.

However, this is only true when comparing the efficiency of difficult prey to other difficult prey (marginally significant Tukey HSD: p = 0.057).

In addition, in our study the difference in mean age between the two groups is marginally significant ( P -value = .057), and this might have contributed to the observed difference in G6PD activity levels.

The plasma S100B levels for the three AMS sufferers changed from 0.100 μg/l (95 % CI −0.029 to 0.229) at baseline to 0.127 μg/l (95 % CI −0.031 to 0.284) at high altitude which was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) compared to the non-AMS sufferers who showed a non-significant ( p = 0.35) change from 0.187 μg/l (95 % CI 0.102–0.272) at baseline to 0.143 μg/l (95 % CI 0.108–0.179) at altitude.

In the first MLM, the interaction of maternal cortisol levels with condition on infant cortisol was marginally significant in the ITT ( b = .435, SE = .229, t = 1.91, p = .057) and PP ( b = ‐.601, SE = .311, t = 1.93, p = .055) approaches.

Participants were more likely to use health care services if a family member cared for them during the illness; however, the association was marginally significant (OR 1.77; 95% CI 0.98 – 3.19; p = 0.057).

Statistically significant differences were found for socio-demographic variables such as age and education ( p < 0.0001), and a prevalence of females that can be considered marginally significant ( p = 0.057) was also observed.

The interaction between group and condition was marginally significant, F (2, 46) = 3.07, p = .057, ƞ 2 p = .12, BF = 4.

Finally, there was a marginally significant two-step indirect effect between capitalization attempts and positive emotions via perceived active-constructive feedback and optimism, b = 0.002, SE = 0.001, p =.057.

Correlation between age of onset and language dominance was marginally significant, χ 2 (2) = 5.728, p = 0.057, φ = 0.383. 7 Recall that there were significant differences between 2L1 and eL2 children with regard to paternal school education and between MON and 2L1 children as well as between 2L1 and eL2 children regarding non-verbal IQ (see Table 1 ).

For the outcome binge drinking four or more times we found marginally significant interaction between intervention x baseline lifetime binge drinking (OR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.12–1.03, p < 0.057) and with stating it would be ok if I drank more (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.16–1.12, p < 0.084,).