Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
The curvature of the LOIC was marginally significant [a4 = 0.14, 95% CI (−0.004, 0.277), p = 0.056], suggesting that whether adolescents or parents hold high educational expectations is related to better parent–child relationships as reported by parents (see Figure 2B ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
A further difference in C6 was driven by marginally significant differences between the DCD and ADHD groups (DCD: M = −2.93, SD = 2.31, ADHD: M = −1.02, SD = 0.94, p = 0.056) and ADHD and control groups (Control: M = −2.64, SD = 1.43, p = 0.076; see Figure 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
In follow-up analyses, separate rANOVAs for each of the rhythmic and arrhythmic conditions with factors ROI and hemisphere revealed a significant effect of ROI (F(2, 20) = 8.662, p = 0.006, η p 2 = 0.490) in the arrhythmic condition, with larger cortical activity over the auditory cortex compared to the sensorimotor ( p = 0.056; marginally significant) and premotor ( p = 0.014; significant) regions but no significant effect of ROI in the rhythmic condition ( Figure 2 I).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Post hoc paired t -tests revealed a significant difference between the face and house associated response in PPA ( t (16) = −4.28, p < 0.01) and a marginally significant difference in FFA ( t (16) = 2.06, p = 0.056) during the test phase, but no significant differences during the baseline phase (PPA: t (16) = 0.81, p = 0.43; FFA: t (16) = −0.37, p = 0.72).
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Variation of specialization with altitude Regarding specialization, the percentage of specialist plant and flower-visitor species increased significantly with altitude for P ( R 2 = 0.54, F 7 = 7.22, P = 0.036), and marginally significant for A ( R 2 = 0.48, F 7 = 5.58, P = 0.056) ( Fig 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
In addition, we observed marginally significant negative indirect effects of LHC through PHYSCHEM (β = -0.125, p = 0.056) and VEG (β = -0.234, p = 0.061), suggesting a tendency for LHC to negatively impact the relative abundance of Pelophylax spp. by altering the vegetation and the physical and chemical characteristics of the waterbody (Online Resource Table 10 ).