Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP=0.0561.1× alphagold
The PD-L1 expression level had no significant correlation with sex and age but had a significant correlation with TNM stage and pathological differentiation no matter in whole tumor tissues or TN (P<0.05), with a marginally significant association with survival status in TN (P=0.056) and significantly associated with pathological differentiation in TS ( Fig. 3A-C ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
In healthy overweight or obese individuals with central adiposity, consuming 15% of the total daily calories from pecans (~42.5 g/2000 Kcal) for 4 weeks lowered both TC and LDLc, although the magnitude of change compared with the control diet (typical American diet) was marginally significant ( p = 0.056, p = 0.067, respectively).
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
The main effect of condition was marginally significant ( F (2, 72) = 3.01, p = .056, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\eta}_p^2 $$\end{document} η p 2 = .08, 1 – β = .57).
marginally significantP =.0561.1× alphagold
Female first-person narrators (ie, the patient) were more likely to report mental status change (56.3%, 27/48) than male first-person narrators (36.4%, 16/44), a marginally significant effect by logistic regression ( P =.056), whereas reports of third-person narrators did not differ for women (27.9%, 12/43) and men (28.2%, 11/39) patients.
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
In the upper visual field, we observed a significant, but Bonferroni uncorrected, response when the hand pointing was directed toward the right (contralateral) hemifield ( T 14 = 2.853; p = 0.013), and a marginally significant effect when the hand pointing was directed toward the left (ipsilateral) hemifield ( T 14 = 2.080; p = 0.056).
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
An analysis of the clustering data revealed a main effect of category size ( F (4, 32) = 8.54, p < .001) and a marginally significant orienting task by category size interaction ( F (4, 32) = 2.58, p = .056), which follows Hunt and Seta's observation of larger differences in clustering between the item-specific and relational encoding conditions for the smaller as compared to the larger categories.
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
healthy controls) of the time needed until the first target was cancelled revealed a significant main effect of the factor ‘column’ (F(3, 144) = 6.545, p < .001), a significant main effect of the factor ‘group’ (F(1, 48) = 5.093, p = .029), and a marginally significant main effect of the factor ‘condition’ (F(3, 144) = 2.573, p = .056).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
For the remote association task, the main effects were not significant (all F-values < 1.55, all p-values > 0.100), but the interaction was marginally significant (F(1,98) = 1.64, partial η 2 = 0.041, p = 0.056), and the simple main effect test showed that the number of correct responses decreased with contingent-pay only in the laboratory condition (t(89) = 2.47, d = 0.93, p = 0.015) (see Fig 2(A)) .