“marginally significant”

However, the differences according to hospital visit as an outpatient and the education period were statistically significant (p=0.003) or marginally significant (p=0.056).

Replication number (i.e., whether the opponent, slavemaker, conspecific, or related species, was used on the first, second, or third time) was taken into account and was marginally significant ( F 2,81 = 3.00, P = 0.056), and none of its interactions with other factors were significant ( P > 0.1 for all interactions).

Frequency of neighboring conspecifics had a marginally significant negative effect for all three groups (light demanding: P = 0.056; mid-tolerant: P = 0.063; shade-tolerant: P = 0.059).

Post hoc paired samples T-tests showed that this bias was significant for numerosity 12 [ t (1,28) = −16,89, p <0.001], numerosity 28 [ t (1,28) = −2.77, p = 0.01], numerosity 36 [ t (1,28) = −2.71, p = 0.01] but marginally significant for numerosity 44 [ t (1,28) = −1,99, p = 0.056] and not significant for numerosity 20 [ t (1,28) = 0.2, p = 0.84].

For flanker notes, a similar ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 30) = 3.94, p = .056, and the main effect of crowding was significant, F (1, 30) = 178.3, p < .0001.

A Wilcoxon rank test of mutation rates per cell division between unicellular and multicellular eukaryotes was marginally significant when we excluded D. discoideum from the analysis (W = 3, p = 0.056).

Hb concentration gradually decreased by eight weeks ( p <0.001), and the difference for infants weighing 1000 g was marginally significant in consideration of group x factor interaction ( p =0.056) ( Fig. 1 ).

On correction for potential confounders, DM remained significantly associated with defective mobilization of CD133 + ( P = 0.015), CD34 + CD133 + ( P = 0.011), and CD133 + KDR + ( P = 0.013) cells, whereas the association between defective CD34 + KDR + mobilization and DM was marginally significant ( P = 0.056) and blunted by age ( P = 0.024).

A cross-sectional study of 722 elderly Japanese found that patients with late AMD had marginally significant lower levels of serum alpha-tocopherol than healthy controls ( p = 0.056) [ 88 ].

Making explicit the competing mental state information about the target object resulted in a marginally significant decrease in the number of children who provided distracter object responses (χ 2 (1, N = 80) = 3.66, p = .056).

There was a marginally significant difference between species in the census period when the first caterpillar left the tie ( F 1,54 = 3.82, p = 0.0560), with the first P. cryptolechiella/reflexella leaving the tie later than P. quercicella .

For the 12-month-old infants significant changes in RTP as a function of time occurred for the Non-native stimuli only, indicated by the marginally significant Window × Language interaction, F (2, 20) = 3.46, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.26.

History of suicide attempts had a marginally significant association with psychological QoL (F=3.816, df=1, p=0.056, adjusted R 2 =0.051) in the univariate regression analysis.

O3PUFA associated with better executive function (Tails B, β = −1.15, p = 0.025, Figure 2C ), however, after adding WMH as a “mediating” variable into the regression equation that included O3PUFA, age, APOE4 and total intracranial volume simultaneously as predictors of executive function, the significant association between O3PUFA and better executive function was lost (β = 0.54, p = 0.332, Figure 2D ) and the WMH association with executive dysfunction remained marginally significant (β = 3589.95, p = 0.056, not illustrated in the Figure).

A marginally significant difference was observed between the infant and younger-adult faces: t (20) = 2.03, p <0.056, indicating more attraction towards the relevant age categories when categorizing infant compared to adult faces ( Figures 2 & 3 ).

Soil pH was significantly higher in prairie cores than in forest (Table 3 ), and there was a marginally significant trend for forest soils to have higher nitrate concentrations than core ( p = 0.056) and shrub-encroached portions ( p = 0.083) of prairies (Table 3 ).

Compared with AZD8931 alone, the difference was marginally significant for SUM149 tumors ( P = 0.056) and FC-IBC-02 tumors ( P = 0.07).Finally, we examined the expression of total EGFR, HER2, HER3, phosphorylated EGFR, phosphorylated HER2, and phosphorylated HER3 in SUM149 xenografted tumors by immunohistochemistry.

Post-hoc tests revealed that this effect was significant for loss (t (45) =−2.7, p=0.01) and was marginally significant for reward (t (32.4) =−2.0, p=0.056).

This effect persisted after co-varying for education [ F (1,43) = 8.99, p = 0.004, n 2 = 0.17] but became marginally significant after adjusting by age [ F (1,43) = 3.85, p = 0.056, n 2 = 0.08].

In the absence of concurrent chemotherapy, although the difference was marginally significant (p=0.056), prophylactic irradiation of the PAN area may be effective if toxicity is not a concern.

When considering time, the mean monthly rate of change in medication overuse showed a decrease (marginally significant) only for patients in the social support group (B=–1.61, P =.056).

Group-wise comparisons of mean CT between the TDC (Mean_TDC = 2.86 mm) and the three dyslexia subgroups confirmed significant increase in CT in the Dys-R ( Mean _Dys-R = 3.02 mm, t (41) = −2.13, p = .037, 95%CI = [−.30, −.01] mm) and Dys-RS ( Mean _Dys-RS=3.13 mm, t (41) = −3.65, p = .001, 95%CI = [−.41, −.11] mm) groups, and marginally significant increase in the Dys-N group ( Mean _Dys-N = 3.01 mm, t (40) = −1.95, p = .056, 95%CI = [−.298, 0.004] mm).

As for the OC patients, PaCO 2 measurements 6 and 24 h postoperatively displayed marginally significant increase (P = 0.056) and decrease (P = 0.044) respectively, compared to laparoscopic group [ 25 ].

The second word (generally the verb, on over 80% of trials) showed an effect of coherence [F(1,25) = 5.5, p = 0.027], which was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between coherence and group [F(1,25) = 4.02, p = 0.056], whereby only the high imagers showed a speedup in reading times on this second word for sequentially coherent compared to sequentially incoherent pairs (Bonferroni: p < 0.05).

Variation of specialization with altitude Regarding specialization, the percentage of specialist plant and flower-visitor species increased significantly with altitude for P ( R 2 = 0.54, F 7 = 7.22, P = 0.036), and marginally significant for A ( R 2 = 0.48, F 7 = 5.58, P = 0.056) ( Fig 3 ).