Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
The second word (generally the verb, on over 80% of trials) showed an effect of coherence [F(1,25) = 5.5, p = 0.027], which was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between coherence and group [F(1,25) = 4.02, p = 0.056], whereby only the high imagers showed a speedup in reading times on this second word for sequentially coherent compared to sequentially incoherent pairs (Bonferroni: p < 0.05).
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Variation of specialization with altitude Regarding specialization, the percentage of specialist plant and flower-visitor species increased significantly with altitude for P ( R 2 = 0.54, F 7 = 7.22, P = 0.036), and marginally significant for A ( R 2 = 0.48, F 7 = 5.58, P = 0.056) ( Fig 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
A further difference in C6 was driven by marginally significant differences between the DCD and ADHD groups (DCD: M = −2.93, SD = 2.31, ADHD: M = −1.02, SD = 0.94, p = 0.056) and ADHD and control groups (Control: M = −2.64, SD = 1.43, p = 0.076; see Figure 2 ).
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
An analysis of the clustering data revealed a main effect of category size ( F (4, 32) = 8.54, p < .001) and a marginally significant orienting task by category size interaction ( F (4, 32) = 2.58, p = .056), which follows Hunt and Seta's observation of larger differences in clustering between the item-specific and relational encoding conditions for the smaller as compared to the larger categories.
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
Although the average of implementation climate across clinics was significant and showed marginally significant variance (variance = 29.77, p = .056), nearly all unexplained variance in attitudes toward eHealth Familias Unidas Mental Health at the between level was negligible (0.870, p = .962).
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Though marginally significant ( P = 0.056), the DT group had a higher g s under MWD compared to WW conditions (Supplementary Figure S2D ), suggesting a sustained g s may enhance carbon gain (Caldeira et al., 2014 ; Tardieu et al., 2014 ), and subsequently crop yield (Fischer et al., 1998 ; Lu et al., 1998 ), under mild stress conditions.
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
vaginalis at month 1 (rho = 0.40, p = 0.03) ( Figure 1A ), a marginally significant correlation between the relative abundance of G. vaginalis and TFV VF concentrations at month 2 (rho = 0.38, p = 0.056) ( Figure 1B ), and no significant correlation by month 3 (rho = 0.1, p = 0.96) ( Figure 1C ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Result We first conducted a 2 (priming type: individualism, collectivism) ×4 (social distance of close target: individual in the same country, individual in the same town, friend, family member) × 2 (individuals toward whom empathy is extended: socially distant target only, socially close target only) × 2 (contribution level: empathic, prosocial act) repeated ANOVA and found a marginally significant main effect of priming, F (1, 199) = 3.70, p = 0.056, ηp 2 = 0.02, a post hoc test found that participants’ overall moral judgments were significantly higher in the collectivist priming condition ( M = 6.19, SD = 0.12) than in the individualist priming condition ( M = 5.87, SD = 0.11), in which collectivism had higher overall moral ratings than individualism for different types of acts.